Posted on 11/24/2016 2:20:22 PM PST by lafroste
OK, this is a little out there. I blundered into an obscure website about an hour ago that claimed that Jill Stein's recount effort was being funded by a bot. That website appeared to be toxic as it crashed my Firefox so I woun't give the link out willy-nilly. It claimed that ever since the donation page opened yesterday, that donations were entering with a nearly mathematical precision, regardless of the time of day (donations just as steady at 3: am as they were at 3:00 pm).
So I decided to do my own impromptu test and got what, I think, are very interesting results. I first logged onto JS's donation website at 3:44 PM EST this afternoon. I finally got my sampling sh%t together by 4:00 PM and took readings every 5 minutes until 4:30. These are the results I got:
Time, reading ($), delta $, Delta time (min), rate of change ($/min)
3:44, $3990,481.84, NA, NA
3:53, 4,012,481.85, $21,634.01, 9 min, $2,403.78
3:55, 4018,237.85, $6,122.00, 2 min, $3,061.00
4:00, 4,027,407.69, $9,169.84 , 5 min, $1,833.97
4:05, $4,036,133.64, 5 min, $8,725.95, $1,745.19
4:10, $4,044,530.03, 5 min, $8,396.39, $1,679.28
4:15, $4,052,919.66, 5 min, $8,389.63, $1,677.93
4:20, $4,058,634.66, 5 min, $5,715.00, $1,143.00
4:25, $4,065,474.09, 5 min, $6,839.43, $1,367.89
4:30, $4,073,973.09, 5 min, $8,499.00, $1,699.80 .
As you can see, the data is remarkably consistent. If this pattern holds, the website should hit its funding goal of $4.5 million about 8:30 PM EST tonight. Also, if you back calculate to the zero dollar point, this funding effort began about 36 hours ago, which if I am not mistaken, is very close to the truth.
These are NOT spontaneous contributions. This is a BOT programmed to make contributions at a set pace while minutely varying minute to minute rates to obscure. But these guys are not very bright, it seems.
Whose BOT is it? What account is it donating from? This stinks to high heaven.
Bookmark
Might be something for your ping list...
And odd amounts, not whole dollars. Almost like the donations were coming in from a different currency, and the amounts reported were the USD equivalents.
I have sent a news tip to Matt Drudge with a link to your thread.
Someone know how to hit Breitbart if Matt doesn’t run it to ground?
Update: at 6:14 PM I took a quick measurement. Funding continues a pace averaging $1,909/min. I used to own watches that weren’t that accurate.
Thanks.
Ping.
Yes and if the donations are coming in from around the world that could explain why one sees similar average amounts throughout the 24 hour day.
It’s not so strange. Updates might be on a timed loop. Not that I’m not suspicious that she’s being funded by trouble makers. I think she has no standing — having lost by more than 40%.
This is unamerican activity because it’s being done to undermine the election and foment trouble in the U.S. Imagine if they reversed the results? Rivers of blood would flow.
I hope Trump has made some inroads with the U.S military command.
Good pick up!
lol
Facts are facts. No tinfoil here.
They have the money already I’m sure. This looks more like a website counter programmed for show.
Maybe it just refreshes every 5 minutes.
Something like Drudge’s site.
Heard about her recount crap at Thanksgiving dinner today. Really wish she and Hillary would let life be normal.
I mean, usually one pledges in round numbers $500. $1,000. $1,500. Not $1,327.83.
Big money goes around the world, for sure, and ends up in all kinds of bank accounts. For the power and the glory, weaving webs and drawing flies - saw a few of those on Cankles and Barry. Big money’s got no soul.
My guess was that the last 4 digits are controlled by a random number generator. They only care about the aggregate anyway.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.