Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Former Bush Ethics Lawyer Files Complaint Against FBI Director for Email Disclosures
slate ^ | 10/30/16 | Daniel Politi

Posted on 10/31/2016 4:02:43 AM PDT by RC one

The former chief ethics lawyer at the White House during George W. Bush’s presidency has filed an ethics complaint against FBI Director James Comey. In an op-ed published in the New York Times on Sunday, Richard W. Painter writes that he filed a complaint against the FBI for violating the Hatch Act, "which bars the use of an official position to influence an election." He filed the complaint with both the Office of Special Counsel and the Office of Government Ethics.

ainter, who was the head White House ethics lawyer between 2005 and 2007 and now supports Hillary Clinton, says Comey violated the Hatch Act when he sent the letter to lawmakers on Friday informing them of the newly discovered emails. “This letter, which was quickly posted on the internet, made highly unusual public statements about an FBI investigation concerning a candidate in the election,” writes Painter. “The letter was sent in violation of a longstanding Justice Department policy of not discussing specifics about pending investigations with others, including members of Congress.”

(Excerpt) Read more at slate.com ...


TOPICS: Society
KEYWORDS: bush; clinton
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 next last
Found this regarding the Hatch act on wikipedia:

It (the Hatch Act) provided that persons below the policy-making level in the executive branch of the federal government must not only refrain from political practices that would be illegal for any citizen, but must abstain from "any active part" in political campaigns, using this language to specify those who are exempt:[5]

(i) an employee paid from an appropriation for the Executive Office of the President; or

(ii) an employee appointed by the President, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, whose position is located within the United States, who determines policies to be pursued by the United States in the nationwide administration of Federal laws.

The director of the FBI is appointed by the President with the advise and consent of the senate. I'm thinking he has a hand in determining "policies to be pursued by the United States in the nationwide administration of Federal laws".

Seems like the Hatch Act doesn't apply to Comey. I'm guessing he knew that before he proceeded with this.

1 posted on 10/31/2016 4:02:43 AM PDT by RC one
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: RC one

He was just following orders from the Congress - the Congress “leaked” it......


2 posted on 10/31/2016 4:05:44 AM PDT by trebb (Where in the the hell has my country gone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RC one

...clown didn’t have any problem with bill Clinton meeting with lynch on the tarmac tho....


3 posted on 10/31/2016 4:07:10 AM PDT by Doogle (( USAF.68-73..8th TFW Ubon Thailand..never store a threat you should have eliminated)))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RC one

Another Harvard/Yale self-appointed public master.

Get the rope.


4 posted on 10/31/2016 4:07:16 AM PDT by thoughtomator (This election is a referendum on the Rule of Law)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: trebb

Yup


5 posted on 10/31/2016 4:07:32 AM PDT by rb22982
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RC one

Seems to me that he didn’t “inform the public.” He informed Congress as he was required to do as instructions from Congress to keep them updated.

Additionally, anybody in, from, behind or connected to the Bush family quibbling and Never Trumping the election now can just Shut The F@ck Up. I don’t want to hear “Bush” anything any more. Not one more word.


6 posted on 10/31/2016 4:08:53 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RC one

The Bush family, and their imps, are political poison to America.


7 posted on 10/31/2016 4:10:37 AM PDT by JonPreston
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RC one
Desperation...we better buckle up. This week is going to set a new record for turmoil in America.

Let's say hypothetically Comey "did" violate Hatch act, even though it doesn't seem to apply to him. What can they do?

8 posted on 10/31/2016 4:10:59 AM PDT by wright2bear (#NeverTrump is a mental disorder!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RC one
I guess Hillary and crew thought it would look bad if one of them filed the complaint so they got on of the “useful idiot” #NeverTrumpers to do it. Not that it will go anywhere, Hatch Act violations are difficult to prosecute even when there is a ton of evidence, and this case has absolute none, but it will serve it's purpose, putting some doubt in the low information voter's minds. (Maybe it will serve another purpose and get Comey so angry he goes after Hillary with a vengeance.....)
9 posted on 10/31/2016 4:11:00 AM PDT by apillar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gaffer

This guy was a Bush “ethics” lawyer, which tells you all you need to know about the complete absence of character of this individual.

The Bush crime family and the Clinton crime family aren’t really two separate operations, which is part of why it’s been such an incredibly difficult slog to hold Clinton to account - she has the Bush clan protecting her as well as her own.


10 posted on 10/31/2016 4:11:01 AM PDT by thoughtomator (This election is a referendum on the Rule of Law)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: RC one

Yet when Comey refused to recommend prosecution for violations of national security that would land any ordinary citizen in prison, that wasn’t about influencing the outcome of the election at all.

Odd, how the election influencing can only go one way.

In a true republic where all citizens have equal rights under the law, criminal activity by a political candidate is not swept under the rug with the pretext that doing something about it will “influence” the election. If a candidate engages in criminal activity, the public deserves to know.

I, for one, am completely sick of the Clinton crime family getting away with blatantly disregarding the law. I long to see their criminal career finally ended.


11 posted on 10/31/2016 4:13:17 AM PDT by exDemMom (Current visual of the hole the US continues to dig itself into: http://www.usdebtclock.org/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RC one

Can we all hope the Bush family changes their enrollment for good after this?


12 posted on 10/31/2016 4:15:55 AM PDT by Behind Liberal Lines (#nevertrump is really #readyforhillary)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wright2bear

Obama can ask for his resignation. That would be interesting.


13 posted on 10/31/2016 4:16:32 AM PDT by RC one (The 2nd Amendment is a doomsday provision, one designed for those exceptionally rare circumstances)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: JonPreston

They should change their last name to Mudd.


14 posted on 10/31/2016 4:18:19 AM PDT by RC one (The 2nd Amendment is a doomsday provision, one designed for those exceptionally rare circumstances)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: RC one

Did Congress require Comey to report, or not?

If so, then the moment Comey informed 535 pairs of loose lips and their staffers, he might as well tell the rest of the planet.


15 posted on 10/31/2016 4:20:19 AM PDT by mewzilla (I'll vote for the first guy who promises to mail in his SOTU addresses.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RC one
Seems like the Hatch Act doesn't apply to Comey. I'm guessing he knew that before he proceeded with this.

Like Harry Reid, this lawyer is a liar and a partisan hack. That he was a Bush ethics lawyer is peripheral and embarrassing.

16 posted on 10/31/2016 4:21:36 AM PDT by jimfree (In November 2016 my 16 y/o granddaughter will have more quality exec experience than Barack Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RC one

the entire investigation and issue is the Clintons and their henchmen trying to influence the election.


17 posted on 10/31/2016 4:24:36 AM PDT by sappy (criminaldems)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thoughtomator

Richard is a Democrat from way back. Ignore him.


18 posted on 10/31/2016 4:26:15 AM PDT by maro (Because she's worse)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: RC one
Did this worthless punk file the same complaint against the AG after her chat with BillyBob a few weeks ago? No,I didn't think so because,after all,they chatted about grandchildren.

No crime there!

19 posted on 10/31/2016 4:26:59 AM PDT by Gay State Conservative (Deplorables' Lives Matter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RC one
Let's take a look back....Apparently nothing should come out within 60 days of an election which would influence an election.

So I guess that's why they lied to the American people..."big time" about Benghazi....didn't want to influence the election via bad news...insane

But the media can create whatever they want?? to influence the election.

All these same people lied about Benghazi....from the President down...

20 posted on 10/31/2016 4:29:01 AM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson