Skip to comments.
Vanity: Internal Freeper poll: Would you accept a tie right now, at this moment?
Free Republic ^
| 10/26/2016
| Self
Posted on 10/26/2016 9:40:19 AM PDT by Eccl 10:2
If offered a deal to take now and only right now, would you accept a tie in the Presidential election, and let it go to the House?
TOPICS: Cheese, Moose, Sister
KEYWORDS: absurdvanity; vanity; youresovain
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-82 next last
To: Eccl 10:2
Not just no, but hell no. Paul Ryan is the enemy inside the tent.
41
posted on
10/26/2016 9:52:46 AM PDT
by
jpl
(Obama lied when Stevens died.)
To: Eccl 10:2
All or nothing race. Loser gets nothing
42
posted on
10/26/2016 9:55:23 AM PDT
by
Steve Van Doorn
(*in my best Eric Cartman voice* 'I love you, guys')
To: Eccl 10:2
As long as it’s a silk necktie, sure.
43
posted on
10/26/2016 9:56:10 AM PDT
by
Cboldt
To: Eccl 10:2
In the words of Spiro Agenew...” a bunch of effete, intellectual, snobs of a boorish variety? I think not” Well he did not say it quite like that but hell now I don’t want Paul Ryan telling me what to do about anything let along who should be POTUS!
To: Eccl 10:2
No. I mean, sure, I’d “accept” it if it happens, the way I’d accept a broken leg, but it isn’t a desired outcome. Quite a lot more is at stake beside whose butt warms the chair in the Oval Office. It is a rejection of the status quo, the cozy establishment of both parties, and a rejection of their marriage in hell with the media and academics that has formed a self-appointed ruling class. That needs to be shouted down loudly and in a huge majority, once and for all. So no, I’m in for a massive wave victory.
To: Eccl 10:2
Internal Freeper poll: Would you accept a tie right now, at this moment? You mean that Republican controlled house which has been so effective in stopping Obama and investigating Hillary?
Gee, that's a tough one. Why wouldn't I want to continue no accomplishments of any noteworthiness?
46
posted on
10/26/2016 9:58:17 AM PDT
by
DiogenesLamp
("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
To: thoughtomator
No. Putting this in Paul Ryan’s hands is a bad deal.
It would not be in Paul Ryan's hands.
It's not a House vote, each State delegation get's one vote.
47
posted on
10/26/2016 9:59:03 AM PDT
by
MMaschin
(The difference between strategy and tactics!)
To: Eccl 10:2
Hell no. Ryan can’t be trusted.
48
posted on
10/26/2016 10:01:38 AM PDT
by
mykroar
(Democrats in 2016: The party of genitalia, real or imagined.)
To: MMaschin
And most of the GOP Congresscritters arte Cheap Labor Express stooges who will vote to keep it running.
49
posted on
10/26/2016 10:03:36 AM PDT
by
Lurkinanloomin
(Know Islam, No Peace - No Islam , Know Peace)
To: Eccl 10:2
No. Win it outright. Otherwise Trump would be beholden to House leadership, which may or may not include Ryan.
50
posted on
10/26/2016 10:03:39 AM PDT
by
oblomov
(We have passed the point where "law," properly speaking, has any further application. - C. Thomas)
To: ConservativeDude
Since Hillary has promised to use executive orders to bypass congress and to pack the supreme court with liberals, congress will not be as relevant as it’s supposed to be.
To: Eccl 10:2
52
posted on
10/26/2016 10:04:36 AM PDT
by
Secret Agent Man
(Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
To: Eccl 10:2
It's crazy how many people on FR don't seem to understand what happens when an election goes to the House.
When it goes to the House, it's not a House vote. The Speaker, and the Leadership, are completely bound by the process, and have no sway.
Each State Congressional delegation has ONE VOTE. The Republicans control more State delegations than the Democrats with both the outgoing, and incoming Houses.
If it goes to the House, there are no IFs, ANDs, or BUTs about it, Trump would be the next President!
53
posted on
10/26/2016 10:06:43 AM PDT
by
MMaschin
(The difference between strategy and tactics!)
To: Eccl 10:2
Because it is not remotely possible that such an scenario could develop.
54
posted on
10/26/2016 10:07:15 AM PDT
by
abb
("News reporting is too important to be left to the journalists." Walter Abbott (1950 -))
To: Eccl 10:2
Heck NO!....
55
posted on
10/26/2016 10:08:07 AM PDT
by
caww
To: Eccl 10:2
56
posted on
10/26/2016 10:09:02 AM PDT
by
Company Man
(T R U M P - P E N C E 2 0 1 6)
To: Eccl 10:2
No. We the people are the only ones I trust to do the right thing.
57
posted on
10/26/2016 10:10:31 AM PDT
by
CaptainPhilFan
(Cankles WILL appoint the 1st sharia compliant islamist jihadist SC Justice)
To: Eccl 10:2
No way. Who wants the characters in DC to decide this election?
58
posted on
10/26/2016 10:11:28 AM PDT
by
MamaB
(Heb. 13:2)
To: Eccl 10:2
59
posted on
10/26/2016 10:12:18 AM PDT
by
nwrep
To: Eccl 10:2
Not a chance. He would take the money and run like all the rest of the criminals.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-82 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson