Posted on 10/12/2016 2:30:25 PM PDT by Arthur Wildfire! March
Rush Limbaugh quoted polling today that the right to bare arms is high priority during this election -- 39% think it's their top concern [if I'm not mistaken].
If you have related info about Hillary v Trump reg. 2nd Amendment, please add.
In followup posts I'll be referring to and linking some shockers for anyone who cares about gun rights.
Wikileaks Release: Hillary Clinton Press Sec Says Gun Control to Be Implemented by Executive Order
Breitbart | 10/7/16 | AWR Hawkins
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3477908/posts
The batch of emails released by Wikileaks on October 7 includes one in which Hillary Clinton press secretary Brian Fallon explained that Clinton “would support…closing the gun show loophole by executive order.” Fallon also highlighted Clinton’s support of universal background checks–which have already failed in California, Colorado, Washington state, and Paris–and her support for a scenario wherein victims of crime would be able to sue gun manufacturers. [snip]
~~~
[But what other executive order might she toy with?]
[2015] Hillary Clinton: Australia Gun Ban ‘Worth Looking At’ In U.S. 34666 30
Breitbart | 16 Oct 2015 | AWR Hawkins
http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3427475/posts
During an October 16 town hall meeting at Keene State College, Democrat presidential hopeful Hillary Clinton said Australia’s confiscation of firearms via a national buyback provides “a good example” for how other countries responded to mass shootings and she said it is “worth looking at” when considering gun policy in the U.S.
Clinton made these statements in response to a questioner who asked if we could ban handgun ownership in the U.S. [snip]
... related ...
Hillary’s gun confiscation proposal is going to backfire in a big way
Hot Air.com ^ | October 17, 2015 | JAZZ SHAW
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3349793/posts
... Hillary Clinton’s startling lurch to the left on guns. The story dealt largely with her fascinating suggestion that the United States should look at a “buyback program” similar to Australia’s draconian laws which they instituted in 1996 following a mass shooting in Tasmania ...
[result from gun seizures ... aka ‘buyback’ ...]
* Australia-wide, homicides went up 3.2 percent
* Australia-wide, assaults went up 8.6 percent
* Australia-wide, armed robberies went up 44 percent.
* In the state of Victoria alone, homicides with firearms are now up 300 percent. Note that while the law-abiding citizens turned them in, the criminals did not, and criminals still possess their guns.
[snip]
~~~
Wikileaks: ‘Has That Gotten Any Press?’ Clinton Asked After Fast and Furious Killing of ICE Agent
Breitbart Texas | 10/11/2016 | byBob Price
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3479649/posts
“Has that gotten any press?” was then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s one-line response to an email notifying her that the gun used to kill Immigration and Customs Enforcement Agent Jamie Zapata in February 2011 was tied to the Fast and Furious scandal. [snip]
[Fast and Furious was Stalinesque — sheer evil. I don’t know if anyone can calculate all of the victims accurately. It’s a LOT of victims, most in Mexico as I understand it. How much does she care about foreigners? This says it all. All she cared about was press reaction. Her goal is on grabbing our guns and she’s hopeful that her lapdogs in the media will be as evil as she is. So far they have been equally indifferent and just as evil.]
~~~
Hillary Clinton: We Cannot End Terrorism Without Gun Control
Breitbart | 23 Sep 2016 | AWR Hawkins
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3472939/posts
[She will say anything and exploit any tragedy or crisis to erode our gun rights.]
~~~
[Now for her running mate ...]
Tim Kaine’s ignorant response to NRA ‘F’ rating lights up Twitter
Twitter via Bizpac Review ^ | Twitter via October 6, 2016 | Scott Morefield
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/3477581/posts
In Tuesday night’s debate, Virginia Senator Tim Kaine tried to describe himself as a “strong Second Amendment supporter” despite the fact that he has consistently been a stringent advocate of gun control during his years in public office.
The NRA begs to differ ... [snip]
~~~
Here’s a balanced summary if you seek more info:
Hillary Clinton on Gun Control
http://www.ontheissues.org/2016/Hillary_Clinton_Gun_Control.htm
Here is the political side ...
Hillary vs the NRA [compared to Trump]
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/bloggers/3474894/posts
Psttt... It’s “Bear” arms, as in carry them, not “bare”
like you in a tee shirt.
I noticed that you posted one of these threads.
I appreciate you posting this. I’ve put the Supreme Court Justice selections as my top issue this year but the 2nd Amendment is integral to an Originalist Supreme Court. I have been talking to others about her plan to use executive orders to institute gun control but did not have the links at my fingertips. Thanks.
Rush job, FRiend. Please add key words.
Right. If a judge hates gun rights, a judge generally hates a free people and the Constitution. It all ties together.
FRegards ....
This is truly important, especially in Florida where it gets pretty hot in the summer. I would be miserable having to wear long sleeve shirts in August.
She wants to take away our right to wear short sleeved shirts!! Is there no limit to the rights this woman doesn’t believe in?
The only question that’s relevane with regard to a hillry presidency is: Will there by widespread confiscations?
It goes without saying that the Second Amendment will be thoroughly trashed, while the Supreme Court is packed with anti-firearms Leftist ‘justices’ utterly dedicated to judicial activism.
relevant
(Insert photo of bare arms, preferably attached to attractive young people)
what is a [aw!m vanity]?
I'm more concerned about bears with guns (a.k.a. "armed bears") than being able to wear a tank top.
Right. Her judicial choices are downright obvious.
It’s an old ‘hello from me’ that dates back to pre-registration on the forum.
Thank you for your hard work and research on this vital issue because time is limited. Up to 2392 posts at the archive:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/2636478/posts?page=2392
FRegards ....
Hopefully, Trump can do what’s needed to energize America to pay attention to those kind of judges, and boot them out.
Thanks for the thread.
Bookmarking.
She doesn’t want you to get skin cancer. It will drive up the cost of Obamacare.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.