Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hydropower is new source of greenhouse gases, says new study
American Bazaar ^ | October 2, 2016 | (AB Wire)

Posted on 10/02/2016 7:22:09 PM PDT by Olog-hai

Hydropower has always been touted as a clean source of generating electricity, despite of the facts that it displaces thousands of people from their natural abodes, destroys their lives and livelihoods and submerges huge amounts of lands and forests.

Now, a new study claims that it is also accelerating global warming. […]

The study is done by Washington State University the has found that during times of drawdown — a period in which the water level behind a dam is rapidly lowered — temperate reservoirs can produce up 20 times more methane than normal. …

(Excerpt) Read more at americanbazaaronline.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Weather
KEYWORDS: climate; climatechangefraud; climatechangehoax; co2; energy; globalwarming; globalwarminghoax; hydroelectricpower; hydropower; methane; scam
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last
Typos galore in this mess. Never mind the pseudoscience.
1 posted on 10/02/2016 7:22:09 PM PDT by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

The insanity of the mental disease known as “liberalism” raises it’s nasty, evil, ugly head every single day.


2 posted on 10/02/2016 7:25:06 PM PDT by lgjhn23 (It's easy to be liberal when you're dumber than a box of rocks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai
Nonsense! The issue here is about control and taxation, not about truth.
3 posted on 10/02/2016 7:25:21 PM PDT by Fungi (Beer, you like beer? Enjoy your beer and all the fungi that come with it,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

I think that they should call themselves “American Bizarre Online”. :=)


4 posted on 10/02/2016 7:25:49 PM PDT by Bob (No, being a US Senator and the Secretary of State are not accomplishments; they're jobs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

5 posted on 10/02/2016 7:26:15 PM PDT by 4Liberty (Can't WAIT to start saying -"TRUMP'S FAULT!!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Good Lord, these people are certifiable!


6 posted on 10/02/2016 7:30:39 PM PDT by vpintheak (Freedom is not equality; and equality is not freedom!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Oh, God, here we go again. If it is not man-made global warming, it is earthquakes caused by fracking or now this crap. These filthy scam artists are what runs academia and their lying pursuit of grants.

That is why they are all DemocRATs.


7 posted on 10/02/2016 7:31:13 PM PDT by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai
Directly west of this idiots university is one of the first major hydroelectric dams in the NW, Grand Coulee dam which has supplied electricity to millions for 70+ years.

He wants to tear it down.

8 posted on 10/02/2016 7:31:17 PM PDT by PROCON ("Lock Her Up! Lock Her Up!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai
So, greenhouse [effect] is all about carbon dioxide, right?

Wrong. The most important players on the greenhouse stage are water vapor and clouds.

Carbon dioxide has been increased to about 0.038% of the atmosphere (possibly from about 0.028% pre-Industrial Revolution) while water in its various forms ranges from 0% to 4% of the atmosphere and its properties vary by what form it is in and even at what altitude it is found in the atmosphere.

In simple terms the bulk of Earth's greenhouse effect is due to water vapor by virtue of its abundance. Water accounts for about 90% of the Earth's greenhouse effect -- perhaps 70% is due to water vapor and about 20% due to clouds (mostly water droplets), some estimates put water as high as 95% of Earth's total tropospheric greenhouse effect (e.g., Freidenreich and Ramaswamy, 'Solar Radiation Absorption by Carbon Dioxide, Overlap with Water, and a Parameterization for General Circulation Models,' Journal of Geophysical Research 98 (1993):7255-7264).

The remaining portion comes from carbon dioxide, nitrous oxide, methane, ozone and miscellaneous other 'minor greenhouse gases.' As an example of the relative importance of water it should be noted that changes in the relative humidity on the order of 1.3-4% are equivalent to the effect of doubling CO2.

http://web.archive.org/web/20100317023946/http://www.junkscience.com/Greenhouse
_________________________________________________________

Water Vapor Rules the Greenhouse System

Water vapor constitutes Earth's most significant greenhouse gas, accounting for about 95% of Earth's greenhouse effect (4). Interestingly, many 'facts and figures' regarding global warming completely ignore the powerful effects of water vapor in the greenhouse system, carelessly (perhaps, deliberately) overstating human impacts as much as 20-fold.

Water vapor is 99.999% of natural origin. Other atmospheric greenhouse gases, carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), and miscellaneous other gases (CFC's, etc.), are also mostly of natural origin (except for the latter, which is mostly anthropogenic).

Human activities contribute slightly to greenhouse gas concentrations through farming, manufacturing, power generation, and transportation. However, these emissions are so dwarfed in comparison to emissions from natural sources we can do nothing about, that even the most costly efforts to limit human emissions would have a very small-- perhaps undetectable-- effect on global climate.

http://web.archive.org/web/20110308203927/http://www.geocraft.com/WVFossils/greenhouse_data.html
____________________________________________________________

Water Vapor Confirmed As Major Player In Climate Change

ScienceDaily (Nov. 18, 2008) -- Water vapor is known to be Earth's most abundant greenhouse gas, but the extent of its contribution to global warming has been debated. Using recent NASA satellite data, researchers have estimated more precisely than ever the heat-trapping effect of water in the air, validating the role of the gas as a critical component of climate change.

http://web.archive.org/web/20120808014318/http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/11/081117193013.htm

9 posted on 10/02/2016 7:31:24 PM PDT by ETL (God PLEASE help America...Never Hillary!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Back to the agenda; all humans must be disappeared, we’re not a “natural” part of Mother Earth. Only the elite progressives are to remain along with a cadre of slaves to support their lavish lifestyles.


10 posted on 10/02/2016 7:32:38 PM PDT by Blue Collar Christian (Broom Hillary MUST be stopped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 4Liberty

That’s excellent.


11 posted on 10/02/2016 7:33:04 PM PDT by Ray76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Good Grief! These idiot liberals should seek help for their mental problems.


12 posted on 10/02/2016 7:33:52 PM PDT by Fiddlstix (Warning! This Is A Subliminal Tagline! Read it at your own risk!(Presented by TagLines R US))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

These people sit around, and dream up this stuff. Probably get paid well, or credits, or something to do so by people with access to a government bank account.

And we wonder where billions of dollars disappeared.


13 posted on 10/02/2016 7:37:14 PM PDT by rockinqsranch (America IS sick, and tired of the Clintons. It's time to say goodbye.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

This is more bent science because they didn’t consider the 3rd purpose of dams (irrigation, power and flood control).

All rivers are prone to flooding. Did they consider the methane release from destroyed vegetation and animals from regular uncontrolled flooding. Of course not.

I’m betting it would be a wash, only with dams you would at least get the economic benefits of irrigation, power and flood control. WSU is seriously in the grips of agenda driven science.

If you read the source material, this garbage is aimed at preventing developing countries from building dams.


14 posted on 10/02/2016 7:37:48 PM PDT by Valpal1 (If the police can t solve a problem with violence, they ll find a way to fix it with brute force)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Not to worry, put a solar superfarm next to the reservoir lake and all the birds that poo in the lake will fry. Fish and turtles might be a bit of a problem, tho, since they don’t fly. Of course that superfarm might also raise global warming but it’s solar so it’s ok.... /s


15 posted on 10/02/2016 7:41:20 PM PDT by blueplum ((March 11, 2016 - the day the First Amendment died?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Valpal1
I should give up electricity altogether to make these people happy. Then, What? Live in a tree house, cave or mud hut?
Bet you a trillion dollars even that can be found to be unsustainable given enough research money.
16 posted on 10/02/2016 7:48:26 PM PDT by stormhill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

The obvious solution is for liberals to kill themselves to balance the methane emissions.


17 posted on 10/02/2016 7:50:10 PM PDT by headstamp 2 (Fear is the mind killer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rockinqsranch
And we wonder where billions of dollars disappeared.


18 posted on 10/02/2016 7:52:46 PM PDT by PROCON ("Lock Her Up! Lock Her Up!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

I work along the lakes and throughout the varying terrain of the southeast and inter-mountain west. The amount of methane that a few lakes produce, in spite of the agenda of the leftist schools, pales in comparison to the methane rich environments of the ebb and flow and immense swamp lands. From the ephemeral to the year round streams and wet lands there is no meaningful way to compare the output of a few lakes whose output of methane would not change at all due to the level of water in it. The methane rises anyways. Once the land is exposed it just empties itself of the said methane faster (maybe 20 times) than if the water had not receded. Even my simple mind is all over this one. Alas, look at the morons our institutions of altered learning produce.


19 posted on 10/02/2016 8:08:17 PM PDT by pbunyon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stormhill
> I should give up electricity altogether to make these people happy. Then, What?

Then they want us to die ...

1. Maintain humanity under 500,000,000 in perpetual balance with nature. - The Georgia Guidestones

20 posted on 10/02/2016 8:24:19 PM PDT by SecondAmendment (Restoring our Republic at 9.8357x10^8 FPS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson