Posted on 07/11/2016 9:35:42 AM PDT by orchestra
Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg said she doesnt even want to contemplate a Donald Trump presidency, during a rare interview released Sunday in which she also talked of heading to New Zealand if the billionaire wins. I cant imagine what this place would be . . . with Donald Trump as our president, the 83-year-old jurist said in an interview in her chambers which was published by the New York Times.
(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...
Ruth, drop us a post card when you get there!
Like other liberals, she wants to move to a white European culture nation.
They never want to move to South America or Africa.
Trump just went up 5 points on that alone.
I bet you could get a lot help with that. :-)
By all means, get out of the country you helped reduce to pitiful status. You’ll still get your undeserved life pension!
While you’re at it take those two equally ugly lesbians with you.
You go, girl!
I’ll pitch in and help with the cost.
Please take them, too.
It’s stunning in the boldness. Sickening
Of course her silly threat to leave is just that, a threat.
Wtf really wants to stop her, other than the head of abortion central Cecily or whatever the heck her name is.
Did I miss her interview regarding the passing of Scalia? I admit I may have.
She should go to Germany. I’m sure the socialists there will make her feel more than welcome.
As a Federal Judge she is bound by the mandatory ethical rules contained in the Code of Conduct for United States Judges.
“Federal judges MUST abide by the Code of Conduct for United States Judges, a set of ethical principles and guidelines adopted by the Judicial Conference of the United States.”
See http://www.uscourts.gov/rules-policies/judiciary-policies/ethics-policies (emphasis added).
Canon 5 says a Judge should not engage in
political activity. Specifically, it provides:
“Canon 5: A Judge Should Refrain from Political Activity
(A) General Prohibitions. A judge should not:
...
(2) ... publicly ENDORSE or OPPOSE a candidate for public office...”
See Canon 5(A), http://www.uscourts.gov/judges-judgeships/code-conduct-united-states-judges (empahais added).”
Again, the Judicial canons are mandatory.
By giving a public interview to the press as reported, it appears she has violated Canon 5(A)(2) by endorsing Clinton, opposing Trump, or both.
She should be subject to a disciplinary investigation by the remainder of the Supreme Court, the Judicial Conference of the United States, and by the House of Representatives under its impeachment authority.
Incentive
>>As a Federal Judge she is bound by the mandatory ethical rules contained in the Code of Conduct for United States Judges.<<
Oh, I forgot. She is a liberal Democrat, so the rules don’t apply to her. My bad.
Indeed, and no one cares. Good riddance to bad rubbish.
Miss Sleepyhead needs to keep this promise. I'm sure President Trump would be glad to find a replacement for her.
She's not capable of doing her job, she's just keeping the bench warm. The pitiful old drunk even passed out at at State of the Union address because she drank to much liquor at dinner before the speech.
she didnt mean it just careless you know
One more reason for everyone here to vote for Trump.
I’ll help her pack.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.