Posted on 07/06/2016 7:51:22 PM PDT by Utilizer
(The American Mirror) July 5, 2016 - This morning’s damning analysis of Hillary Clinton’s actions related to her personal email server and her now disproven claims are the subject of a brutal new video released by the Donald Trump campaign. “I did not send or receive any information that was marked classified at the time,” Clinton says in an ABC News interview featured in the ad.
“From the 30,000 emails returned to the State Department in 2014, 110 emails in 52 email chains have been determined by the owning agency to contain classified information at the time they were sent or received,” Comey said this morning — a direct contradiction of Clinton’s previous statement.
After repeating Clinton’s clip, the shows Comey saying, “Eight of those chains contained information that was ‘top secret’ at the time they were sent.”
He continues, “Thirty-six of those chains contained ‘secret’ information at the time they were sent.”
The video will do nothing to ease voters’ minds about Clinton’s lack of trustworthiness or honesty.
Bloody 'ell!
Lying Witch.
No need to insult witches, now. I happen to know some very nice (and very cute) witches, I will have you know. :)
Perhaps labeling her a muzrimmist would work better, as they also have no problems being deceitful to anyone who does not share the same beliefs as they do.
Indeed, they are quite gleeful about pulling the wool over everyone else’s eyes -just like mrs bill!
“At the time” or not, she clearly lied and misstated her actions.
Here is a question that should be asked over and over.
If Hillary Clinton were never married to Bill Clinton, would she be where she is today? She is only here because of Bill’s coat tails. She didn’t do anything on her own.
Another question is if it wasn’t for Ross Perot would we even know who bill Clinton is?
Lady Liberty was raped.
Will Hillary have her Press Conference at the UN ,again
See How They Lie!
I think it’s a very, very powerful ad. It gives voters who instinctively know Hillary is an opportunistic criminal, but who otherwise may have given her a pass, a concrete reason why they should not vote for her.
The difference is between charges of first degree murder or willful homicide!
I guess no one knows the word ‘contemporaneous’
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.