Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hillary will not be indicted. (vanity)
me

Posted on 06/09/2016 7:21:46 PM PDT by Leaning Right

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-89 next last
To: Leaning Right
Obama does not like to be embarrassed by events. So I must conclude that the fix is in.

Embarrassment means nothing to Obama.

Obama has successfully penetrated the Federal Government through political appointees and bureaucratic hires.

Obama has successfully penetrated the Judicial system via blackmail, appointments and DOJ persuasion.

Obama has successfully penetrated the Military through persecusion, prosecution of senior military officials and has carefully selected replacements that simply gel the military.

41 posted on 06/09/2016 7:48:27 PM PDT by Fhios (Remember who supported who and who said what in election year 2016.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pgyanke

Good point about Obama and the Olympics. I forgot about that fiasco.


42 posted on 06/09/2016 7:49:14 PM PDT by Leaning Right (Why am I holding this lantern? I am looking for the next Reagan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Leaning Right

This allows Obama crocodile tears as Biden is appointed to replace an ill Hillary.


43 posted on 06/09/2016 7:51:28 PM PDT by Mike Darancette (The most vocal supporters of a good con man are the victims.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Leaning Right
She will never be indicted.

The major reason is that she has been on the inside for so long she knows too much about the rest of the major players.

Do you think for one minute that she is the only person in high office who has heir hand in the till?

If she goes, she talks.

They can not have that.

44 posted on 06/09/2016 7:52:47 PM PDT by old curmudgeon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Leaning Right

Obama bought hisself some plausible deniability today .....he will be shocked, but must back the legal process, the courts, law and order etc while also using her “charges” to fuel riots, protests, media outrage that he as POTUS has to quell with “extreme unprecedented measures” .........

Then uncle Joe wades into the fray as the rat running in her place with Poke’a nutcase Warren as VP to save the day. Biden will be Obamas best bet to continue the destruction of America as Mrs Bill would just sell it.

My fictional take on todays BS from the white hut for nuts.


45 posted on 06/09/2016 7:53:43 PM PDT by Squantos ( Be polite, be professional, but have a plan to kill everyone you meet ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mike Darancette

Agree ...


46 posted on 06/09/2016 7:54:28 PM PDT by Squantos ( Be polite, be professional, but have a plan to kill everyone you meet ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Kit cat

and what will justice do?

Answer: Nothing.


47 posted on 06/09/2016 7:55:53 PM PDT by rockinqsranch (Dems, Libs, Socialists Call 'em what you will, they all have fairies livin' in their trees.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: blueyon

Unlike our side. The left stands by their nominee knowing she’s a criminal. The right won’t stand by their guy because he’s not politically correct. Cowards all.


48 posted on 06/09/2016 7:56:05 PM PDT by jersey117 (ut)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: AndyTheBear

There are two scenarios where she still might be indicted:

There may be a third way

Is it possible the FBI could charge her with a crime at a State level not a Federal level?

The 4th way:

Simply hold a press conference and and say “If Hillary Clintbitch were not a high demonratic official she’d have already been in jail. The evidence is overwhelming. This is a slam dunk case. For Obama to instruct the AG to not indite should be grounds for impeachment.”

I doubt that either of those would happen


49 posted on 06/09/2016 7:59:29 PM PDT by Fai Mao (I'm not a crank! I just act like one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Jane Long
Thanks for the Judge Jeanine quotes! I'll check YouTube tomorrow, perhaps the whole segment will be posted there by then.
50 posted on 06/09/2016 7:59:53 PM PDT by Leaning Right (Why am I holding this lantern? I am looking for the next Reagan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: rockinqsranch

I am saying FBI will leak the report if they recommend indictment Comey is a straight forward guy he WILL get the report out one way or another!!! If indictment is recommend it will destroy her regardless!!!


51 posted on 06/09/2016 8:00:41 PM PDT by Kit cat (Yosemite Sam raising hell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Leaning Right

;-)

Worth the watch, if you can find it.


52 posted on 06/09/2016 8:05:37 PM PDT by Jane Long (Go Trump, go! Make America Safe Again :)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Kit cat

“Comey is a straight forward guy”

If he does leak the information, it kills Hillary and makes a fool of Obama. The country will believe Comey over Obama. He really doesn’t have many good choices...Comey is the most powerful person in DC these days.


53 posted on 06/09/2016 8:05:46 PM PDT by MaxistheBest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: MaxistheBest
Thank you for that. The first one, 18 USC Section 793(f) describes a criminal penalty.

"Whoever, being entrusted with or having lawful possession or control of any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, note, or information, relating to the national defense, (1) through gross negligence permits the same to be removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of his trust, or to be lost, stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, or (2) having knowledge that the same has been illegally removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of its trust, or lost, or stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, and fails to make prompt report of such loss, theft, abstraction, or destruction to his superior officer— Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both."

I need to mull that one over - "permits the same to be removed from its proper place of custody . . ." I see why this is so complicated.

Thanks again. ;)

54 posted on 06/09/2016 8:06:40 PM PDT by Tau Food (Never give a sword to a man who can't dance.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Leaning Right

Judge Nap: ‘Major Conflict of Interest’ in Obama Endorsement of Hillary

Judge Andrew Napolitano said today that if President Obama endorses Hillary Clinton, it could create a major conflict of interest with respect to the ongoing FBI investigations.

Obama, who is meeting with Bernie Sanders at the White House today, is reportedly closing in on giving his official backing to the former First Lady, who clinched the nomination earlier this week.

On Fox and Friends this morning, Napolitano said this is all happening amid two separate FBI investigations: one into Clinton’s private emails as secretary of state and another into possible corruption linked to the Clinton Foundation.

excerpt

http://insider.foxnews.com/2016/06/09/judge-nap-major-conflict-interest-if-obama-endorses-hillary-amid-fbi-probes


55 posted on 06/09/2016 8:08:02 PM PDT by huldah1776 ( Vote Pro-life! Allow God to bless America before He avenges the death of the innocent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Leaning Right

I don’t think Lynch will ever indict, but the endorsement doesn’t have any evidentiary value one way or the other, in my view. They always endorse, every single time, once there is a nominee. It is a dem. ritual. If O endorsed and later they indicted, he’d say “See, proof I didn’t control the process, and proof I didn’t interfere, and proof I didn’t know, or why would I endorse?”

If he doesn’t endorse, he’s saying “She’s a crook and she might go down.”
Dems NEVER say that. They stick together like the rats they are.

It means nothing, in my view.


56 posted on 06/09/2016 8:09:48 PM PDT by The Continental Op
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RushIsMyTeddyBear

Are there ANY patriots left in the govt.? Any? Any at all?
_______

I would only vouch for one, Jeff Sessions. There are a few others, I know, but I’m not knowledgable enough to know who.


57 posted on 06/09/2016 8:10:58 PM PDT by The Continental Op
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: InterceptPoint

No one can recommend an indictment. It is for a grand jury to decide. The DOJ can opt not to convene a GJ, but I think that will be worse for them. In my opinion it all rests on Comey. If he thinks he has enough to take toa GJ, and the Lynch declines to do so, I think he will do what it takes to force her hand. Everything I have ever heard about him says he is stand up. I believe there are still enough principled folks in the FBI to push the issue..


58 posted on 06/09/2016 8:12:54 PM PDT by cardinal4 (Certified Islamophobe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Fai Mao

I don’t think 3 and 4 are even plausible, and 1 is admittedly remote. 2 is still the only likely way I can see it happening.


59 posted on 06/09/2016 8:12:58 PM PDT by AndyTheBear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Tau Food

“permits the same to be removed from its proper place of custody”

No problem...it’s actually a slam dunk. Don’t believe the talking heads; she removed them on purpose. If you want to know the real deal, look up Andrew McCarthey at National Review Online. He is a former US prosecutor and makes all this very clear.


60 posted on 06/09/2016 8:14:37 PM PDT by MaxistheBest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-89 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson