Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mathematicians And 'The Man Who Knew Infinity'
Inside Science ^ | 29 Apr, 2016 | Ramin Skibba

Posted on 04/30/2016 8:09:39 AM PDT by MtnClimber

(Inside Science) – In 1914, an unknown Indian man boarded a ship and traveled across the world to Cambridge University in England, where he could finally follow his passion for mathematics. In the few short years between his arrival and untimely death, he filled notebooks with formulas and discovered theorems, some of which still influence the work of mathematicians and scientists today.

The new biopic, "The Man Who Knew Infinity," which opens in U.S. theaters beginning Friday, April 29, chronicles the life of Srinivasa Ramanujan. A self-taught Indian mathematician from the city then called Madras (now Chennai), Ramanujan struggled to overcome racism, poverty, and outsider status in imperial Britain during the tumultuous time of World War I. But he eventually won over the mathematical community and was the second Indian to become a Fellow of the Royal Society.

Written and directed by Matthew Brown, the film gives an authentic portrayal of how mathematicians actually work. At Cambridge, Ramanujan, began an unlikely partnership with G. H. Hardy, who quickly recognized his impressive, if untrained, mathematical abilities.

(Excerpt) Read more at insidescience.org ...


TOPICS: Education; Science
KEYWORDS: britain; cambridge; hindu; india; mathematics; ramanujan; srinivasaramanujan; stringtheory
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-75 last
To: ZinGirl; Gamecock

ZinGirl: “Bragger. I can only count to 20.”

Oh... anyone can do much better.
Just add in nose, tongue, elbows, knees, heels, ancles... etc., until you reach the numbers you desire.

;-)


61 posted on 05/02/2016 10:59:46 AM PDT by BroJoeK (a little historical perspective...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: BroJoeK

That’s to advanced.


62 posted on 05/02/2016 12:04:05 PM PDT by Gamecock ( Do not be afraid of those who kill the body but cannot kill the soul...Matthew 10:28)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Gamecock

;-)


63 posted on 05/02/2016 1:04:12 PM PDT by BroJoeK (a little historical perspective...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: BroJoeK

That’s what democrats do, but they always lose count and have to start over if it gets higher than twenty five.


64 posted on 05/02/2016 1:26:11 PM PDT by MHGinTN (Democrats bait then switch; their fishy voters buy it every time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Talisker
You know why we can't have nice things? That's why we can't have nice things!

You have to at least have enough imagination to dream about nice things, whether by day or by night. If you haven't been challenged to explore and expand the rim of your experience, it is unlikely that you will dream beyond it.

Pity many of our poorly challenged children, who only see drugs, obscenities, and filth, who will miss beauty in their lives and die without it..

65 posted on 05/04/2016 2:50:12 AM PDT by imardmd1 (Fiat Lux)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber
Thanks so much for catching this story. It has caused me to think back over what prompts children to exercise the kind of imagination that brought this young man to consider infinity or anything like it.

I believe that most of this capability for adventure of the mind becomes real only while an infant's mind is developing and probably ceases to grow at about the time of puberty. I don't know what the educators philosophize about, but simply training children to fit some kind of existing job when their schooling is done seems rather limiting and without much challenge.

I want to see this movie before it becomes too stale for the theaters.

66 posted on 05/04/2016 3:19:49 AM PDT by imardmd1 (Fiat Lux)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Boojum

1 x 1 x 1 = 1
12 x 12 x 12 = 1728
1 + 1728 = 1729

9 x 9 x 9 = 729
10 x 10 x 10 = 1000
729 + 1000 = 1729

Therefore, 1 cubed plus 12 cubed = 1729 and 9 cubed plus 10 cubed also equals 1729. Thus, no error in the statement.


67 posted on 05/04/2016 3:47:16 AM PDT by logos (Only an educated intellectual will consistently misread plain language.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: imardmd1

In the article it’s 9 cubed plus 10 cubed, not 6 cubed.


68 posted on 05/04/2016 3:49:04 AM PDT by logos (Only an educated intellectual will consistently misread plain language.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

Bump for later.


69 posted on 05/04/2016 3:53:35 AM PDT by SouthParkRepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: logos
Read the article abt 5 days ago ad figured it out right away, within abt 30 secods, then poted #24, #26, and #27. That was about five days ago.

In fact, a shorter answer is that:

(one cubed plus two cubed) cubed plus three cubed = 1729,

which fact was posted a few days ago, also.

Got that?

70 posted on 05/04/2016 6:01:57 AM PDT by imardmd1 (Fiat Lux)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: logos
In the article it’s 9 cubed plus 10 cubed, not 6 cubed.

That is not correct. The original article reads exactly the way I cut and pasted it into Post #24.

71 posted on 05/04/2016 6:07:51 AM PDT by imardmd1 (Fiat Lux)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: logos
In the article it’s 9 cubed plus 10 cubed, not 6 cubed.

That is not correct. The original article reads exactly the way I cut and pasted it into Post #24. Read the errats note at the bottom of the article:

"Additional note: This story originally contained a math error, which one of our readers helpfully pointed out. We've corrected the text and we regret the error."

72 posted on 05/04/2016 6:12:47 AM PDT by imardmd1 (Fiat Lux)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: logos
(one cubed plus two cubed) cubed plus three cubed = 1729,

My apology on this! The above statement I made is not right at all! One cubed plus two cubed is nine, not ten!

I guess I'm not so smart, hm?

73 posted on 05/04/2016 6:20:17 AM PDT by imardmd1 (Fiat Lux)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

Adding it to my list, though if it comes to KC it’ll probably be in one of the art theaters on the Kansas side.


74 posted on 05/04/2016 6:29:36 AM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RipSawyer

Flip the 6 upside down, and you have your answer.


75 posted on 05/14/2016 6:06:43 PM PDT by kiryandil (To the GOPee: "Giving the Democrats the Supreme Court means you ARE the Democrats.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-75 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson