Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Anyone have a different source?
1 posted on 04/07/2016 11:59:33 PM PDT by morphing libertarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: morphing libertarian

He was born in the US military hospital in the Canal Zone, which was administered and run by the US government until the late 1990s.


2 posted on 04/08/2016 12:01:06 AM PDT by pepsionice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: morphing libertarian

Heard that too.

I understand he was Born outside the Panama Canal Zone.

Doesn’t matter though, he was born to two American Citizen Parents.


4 posted on 04/08/2016 12:02:57 AM PDT by Kickass Conservative (It is better to live one day as a lion than one hundred years as a sheep)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: morphing libertarian

Why do you care? You don’t want him running for anything do you? I sure don’t.


5 posted on 04/08/2016 12:03:05 AM PDT by Bullish (Face it, insanity is just not presidential.x)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: morphing libertarian

Both his parents were Americans. That makes him a natural born citizen of the United States under the original intent of the Constitution.


6 posted on 04/08/2016 12:03:39 AM PDT by SubMareener (Save us from Quarterly Freepathons! Become a MONTHLY DONOR!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: morphing libertarian

More importantly, where was he not born. He was not born in any of the 48 united States. Neither was George Romney or Barry Goldwater.


8 posted on 04/08/2016 12:04:50 AM PDT by Hoodat (Article 4, Section 4)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: morphing libertarian

A freeper told me he was born in a hospital outside the Canal Zone. Which may have been the reason something funny went on when he was running against Obama. Didn’t Congress make some sort of agreement on where he was born...or that it was ok? Now they’re not even keeping up the pretense.

“The One, The True, The ONLY Principled Constitutional Conservative” was born in Canada of a Cuban/Canadian father and a woman who may have renounced her US citizenship before Cruz was born.


10 posted on 04/08/2016 12:08:29 AM PDT by Aria (2016: The gravy train v Donald Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: morphing libertarian
The resolution says he was born on base, but I have read a dozen times here that he was born in a hospital in the COUNTRY of Panama.

It makes no difference as to his eligibility. He is eligible either way.

Crackpots talk about bases being "US territory" or some such nonsense. But (1) it doesn't matter and (2) if a base were US territory, then any babies born to Panamanian parents on base would be anchor babies, but they are not!

Anyone have a different source?

https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R42097.pdf

31 posted on 04/08/2016 12:42:05 AM PDT by cynwoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: morphing libertarian

Trump tower?


35 posted on 04/08/2016 12:47:26 AM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: morphing libertarian

The actual birthplace of John McCain is in dispute and remains unproven due to John McCain refusing to release his certified copy of his birth certificate to the public. While John McCain is reported to have shown a copy of his birth certificate to one selected reporter, the reporter wrote that John McCain was born at the U.S. Navy Hospital Area, Coco Solo Naval Air Station, Canal Zone, which contradicts the alleged John McCain birth certificate released in the 2008 court documents from the plaintiff, Fred Hollander. Hollander’s purported copy of the John McCain birth certificate reports the birth took place at the Colon Hospital, Colon, R.P. (Republic of Panama). Depending on which alleged birthplace is the actual birthplace, John McCain was born in either the unincorporated U.S. territory of the Canal Zone or the foreign territory of the Republic of Panama. Interestingly, however, neither of those birth locations change the fact John McCain III was born with naturalized U.S. citizenship and not with U.S. natural born citizenship. No person born abroad without diplomatic immunity can be born with any U.S. citizenship other than by automatic naturalization at birth; as observed in various U.S. Supreme Court cases such as: United State v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649, 18 S.Ct. 456, 42 L.Ed. “A person born out of the jurisdiction of the United States can only become a citizen by being naturalized....” A reasonable beginners summary may be found at Wikipedia:

John McCain

John McCain was born in 1936 at Coco Solo Naval Air Station[94][107][108][109][110][111][112] in the Panama Canal Zone. McCain’s eligibility was not challenged during his 2000 campaign, but it was challenged during his 2008 campaign.

McCain never released his birth certificate to the press or independent fact-checking organizations, but in 2008 did show it to Washington Post reporter Michael Dobbs, who wrote, “[A] senior official of the McCain campaign showed me a copy of [McCain’s] birth certificate issued by the ‘family hospital’ in the Coco Solo submarine base.”[109] A lawsuit filed by Fred Hollander in 2008 alleged McCain was actually born in a civilian hospital in Colón, Panama.[113][114] Dobbs wrote that in his autobiography, Faith of My Fathers, McCain wrote that he was born “in the Canal Zone” at the U.S. Naval Air Station in Coco Solo, which was under the command of his grandfather, John S. McCain Sr. “The senator’s father, John S. McCain Jr., was an executive officer on a submarine, also based in Coco Solo. His mother, Roberta McCain, has said that she has vivid memories of lying in bed listening to raucous celebrations of her son’s birth from the nearby officers’ club. The birth was announced days later in the English-language Panamanian American newspaper.”[115][116][117][118]

The former unincorporated territory of the Panama Canal Zone and its related military facilities were not regarded as United States territory at the time,[119] but 8 U.S.C. § 1403, which became law in 1937, retroactively conferred citizenship on individuals born within the Canal Zone on or after February 26, 1904, and on individuals born in the Republic of Panama on or after that date who had at least one U.S. citizen parent employed by the U.S. government or the Panama Railway Company; 8 U.S.C. § 1403 was cited in Judge William Alsup’s 2008 ruling, described below. A March 2008 paper by former Solicitor General Ted Olson and Harvard Law Professor Laurence H. Tribe opined that McCain was eligible for the Presidency.[120] In April 2008, the U.S. Senate approved a non-binding resolution recognizing McCain’s status as a natural-born citizen.[121] In September 2008, U.S. District Judge William Alsup stated obiter in his ruling that it is “highly probable” that McCain is a natural-born citizen from birth by virtue of 8 U.S.C. § 1401, although he acknowledged the alternative possibility that McCain became a natural-born citizen retroactively, by way of 8 U.S.C. § 1403.[122]

These views have been criticized by Chin, who argues that McCain was at birth a citizen of Panama and was only retroactively declared a born citizen under 8 U.S.C. § 1403, because at the time of his birth and with regard to the Canal Zone the Supreme Court’s Insular Cases overruled the Naturalization Act of 1795, which would otherwise have declared McCain a U.S. citizen immediately at birth.[123] The U.S. State Department’s Foreign Affairs Manual states that children born in the Panama Canal Zone at certain times became U.S. nationals without citizenship.[124] In Rogers v. Bellei, the Supreme Court ruled that children “born abroad of American parents” are not citizens within the citizenship clause of the 14th Amendment but did not elaborate on their natural-born status.[125][126] Similarly, legal scholar Lawrence Solum concluded in an article on the natural born citizen clause that the question of McCain’s eligibility could not be answered with certainty, and that it would depend on the particular approach of “constitutional construction”.[127] The urban legend fact checking website Snopes.com considers McCain’s eligibility “undetermined”.[128]

Arguments over McCain’s eligibility became moot after he lost the United States presidential election in 2008.


50 posted on 04/08/2016 1:05:36 AM PDT by WhiskeyX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: morphing libertarian

I think McCain actually hatched, he really wasn’t born.


51 posted on 04/08/2016 1:08:27 AM PDT by kaehurowing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: morphing libertarian

1860?


53 posted on 04/08/2016 1:12:12 AM PDT by dp0622 (The only thing an upper crust conservative hates more than a liberal is a middle class conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: morphing libertarian

I seem to recall that the consensus of the amateur sleuths on FR is that McCain is NBC because he had TWO U.S. citizen parents, regardless of where he was born.

The White House website says that Soetoro was a British Subject at birth.


59 posted on 04/08/2016 1:34:38 AM PDT by Arthur McGowan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: morphing libertarian

John McCain was born from an American Military officer and citizen stationed abroad in Panama with his wife, another American Citizen.

What’s your point? You angling that John McCain is not an NBC? That won’t work. He is and it’s undeniable.


65 posted on 04/08/2016 2:44:17 AM PDT by Fhios (Going Donald Trump is as close to going John Galt as we'll get.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: morphing libertarian

Why does it matter to you? My daughter was born in Brindisi Italy, in an Italian hospital and is a natural born citizen because I was stationed there and me and her mother are both natural born citizens. Got birth certificates signed by Alexander Haig saying she’s one of us....


69 posted on 04/08/2016 3:59:09 AM PDT by trebb (Where in the the hell has my country gone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: morphing libertarian; patlin
Change your method of thinking. Use patlin's excellent thread/article on the many attempts to change the natural born definition and see what the sponsors wanted to change it to mean/read.

If there is something that applies to somebody then that person is not a natural born citizen as nothing would be needed to be changed to make them one.

77 posted on 04/08/2016 5:03:18 AM PDT by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty arny instnd supped with infamy. Benjamiin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson