"Ready examples" of two things which only liberal bed-wetters find "outrageous".
And does anyone need wonder why celebrities are so depressingly left-wing?
I’d suggest that, as the book of Ecclesiastes argues and concludes, that there is a proper time for it, too, and that the proper time must observe the desires of a living God or else be resigned to being in vain.
There is a crying need for genuine moral outrage.
Then there is “permanent” outrage, which is always on full, and should be ignored.
The only reason the author would write such a piece would be because he sees shades of grey only and has no moral compass so he can’t understand.
Before outrage the NYT might research moral principles.
“Moral outrage” is the tool of Leftist politcal bigots who incapable of winning an argument on policy and law with facts are reduced to screaming names at their opponents.
Use to work until Trump came along.
Hahahahahahahahaha!
Oh my.....let me catch my breath.......
Hahahahahahahahahahahahaha!
I didn’t know the New York Times had turned into a comic book! Two funny stories in one day!
It took four people to write this?
Gee, right when Hillary Clinton is running for President.
How convenient.
How funny!
Peacock feathers are like moral outrage?
We shouldn’t be upset with liars and thieves?
Hahahahahahahahahahaha!
Maybe the New York Times could have some drawings with this article. You know, like a coyote plucking the tail feathers off a peacock. Or maybe Hillary Clinton quivering under her sheets in her bedroom as four Americans are murdered in Benghazi.
Please, New York Times, give us more humor like this!
It helps us forget the misery these years of Barack Obama have given us.