Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

5 Reasons Republicans Shouldn’t Fear A SCOTUS Fight
The Federalist ^ | 17 Feb, 2016 | David Harsanyi

Posted on 02/17/2016 4:04:48 PM PST by MtnClimber

Republicans need to ask themselves a couple of questions before they battle over Barack Obama's eventual nominee to replace Justice Scalia on the Supreme Court. Is there any good reason to allow this president to change the ideological composition the Supreme Court radically? What is the political downside of denying him?

The GOP could start by making arguments about the Senate's duty to preserve the Supreme Court's integrity as a bulwark against the vagaries of democracy and executive abuse. And while that sounds like a fantastic case to me, I'm skeptical the average voter cares all that much about idealism in this year of grievance and anger. There are, however, a number of political reasons the GOP shouldn't - and can't - back down.

1. 'Obstructionism' Will Not Sink the GOP Not once during any of my media appearances about the Scalia vacancy have I been asked, "Do you believe Democrats will pay a price if the president nominates another hard-left ideologue?" Hosts are curious about whether Republican “overreach” will hurt the GOP in November

(Excerpt) Read more at thefederalist.com ...


TOPICS: Society
KEYWORDS: scoyus

1 posted on 02/17/2016 4:04:48 PM PST by MtnClimber
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

The GOP needs to grow a spine.


2 posted on 02/17/2016 4:05:16 PM PST by MtnClimber (For photos of Colorado scenery and wildlife, click on my screen name for my FR home page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

Good article. I’ll never vote Republican again if they cave on this.


3 posted on 02/17/2016 4:08:41 PM PST by Sans-Culotte ('''Political correctness is communist propaganda writ small''~ Theodore Dalrymple)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber
preserve the Supreme Court's integrity as a bulwark against the vagaries of democracy and executive abuse.

Huh? Whaaaaat? Huh, what? The Supreme Court has been trafficking in the vagaries of democracy.

4 posted on 02/17/2016 4:14:19 PM PST by Migraine (Diversity is great -- until it happens to YOU.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber
Republicans need to ask themselves a couple of questions before they battle over Barack Obama's eventual nominee to replace Justice Scalia on the Supreme Court.

Battle? What the heck do they mean battle?

5 posted on 02/17/2016 4:14:44 PM PST by BerryDingle (I know how to deal with communists, I still wear their scars on my back from Hollywood-Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber
What possible penalty is there for completely stalling the procedure until 0bama is out of office? A media tongue-lashing? 0bama calling them names? Come on, guys, this is politics, if he wants a Supreme Court justice as part of his legacy, what's he offering in return? Nothing?

More to the point, will refusal to yield cost the Republicans any Senate or House seats? No? Then folks, face it - 0bama's got nothing.

6 posted on 02/17/2016 4:17:01 PM PST by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BerryDingle

Has Rich Lowry of the National Review come out to agree with Obama , Yet?


7 posted on 02/17/2016 4:17:07 PM PST by scooby321
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber
It would be a different world if we could find the proper means to motivate the congress to grow a spine and assert its power.


8 posted on 02/17/2016 4:21:43 PM PST by Travis McGee (www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Billthedrill

Yes, Obama will call them.names. so will Hillary and Bernie.

And the media will carry the message that Republicans are being obstructionists.

Yes, the Republicans may be afraid of what the liberals say about them.

So which is it?,,,,

Do Republicans take a stand and fight this battle?

Or do they give and and meekly allow a 5th liberal join the Supreme Court, but avoid having the MSNBC talking heads say mean things about them????


9 posted on 02/17/2016 4:25:57 PM PST by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Sans-Culotte

If they cave on this you can kiss the 2nd Amendment Rights away. This issue alone will be the spark that ignites yje civil unrest that Obama has sought to provoke for the past 7 years.

Keep your powder dry and look for the whites of their eyes.


10 posted on 02/17/2016 4:33:22 PM PST by Forty-Niner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Forty-Niner

If Cornyn caves on this I’ll vote for his ‘rat opponent next time he runs. Six of one, half a dozen of the other.


11 posted on 02/17/2016 4:41:39 PM PST by Sans-Culotte ('''Political correctness is communist propaganda writ small''~ Theodore Dalrymple)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

Won’t be a real fight, the Republicans will hold out for the best deal ( probably a couple of year tax cut for the wealthy) then will give Obama what he wants.


12 posted on 02/17/2016 4:42:26 PM PST by heights
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

b o r k

‘em

suck a lemon ................


13 posted on 02/17/2016 4:43:54 PM PST by zzwhale (YEP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee

The MSM will demonize Republicans if they block the Obama selection. The Republicans need to do a better job of calling the MSM the communist water carriers that they are.


14 posted on 02/17/2016 4:45:55 PM PST by MtnClimber (For photos of Colorado scenery and wildlife, click on my screen name for my FR home page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: zzwhale

If the GOP had any unity and reliable principles, the best thing to do would be to let Obammy make his appointment, call the nominee to confirmation hearings and then bat him around like a toy every day between now and the election, pointing out the moral and intellectual bankruptcy of liberalism before soundly voting to reject the nominee sometime around Halloween.


15 posted on 02/17/2016 4:48:41 PM PST by Joe 6-pack (Qui me amat, amat et canem meum.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

Regarding the future of this nation, if this is not worth fighting over, nothing is.


16 posted on 02/17/2016 5:15:59 PM PST by unlearner (RIP America, 7/4/1776 - 6/26/2015, "Only God can judge us now." - Claus Von Stauffenberg / Valkyrie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

You got that right. But they have no balls.
They care more about getting face time on network TV by being “moderate” lapdogs.


17 posted on 02/18/2016 5:01:52 AM PST by Travis McGee (www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson