Posted on 01/26/2016 8:31:42 AM PST by conservativejoy
Donald Trump has slept with a lot of married women. Don't take my word for it, take his.
Trump wrote that he once considered an open marriage with his first wife, and in his book "The Art of the Comeback" he said: "If I told the real stories of my experiences with women, often seemingly very happily married and important women, this book would be a guaranteed best-seller."
Not only did he commit mass adultery, but he bragged about it. Should such an immoral man be elected President?
But it is a private affair, you may say. His private life, which is separate from his public life.
I don't think so. If a man is dishonest in his relationship with his wife, that shows a big flaw in his character. If he will be dishonest to the number one person in his life, he will have no qualms about being dishonest with the American people:
1) Trump has said that Ted Cruz's citizenship is no problem in September and now it is a big problem. Which time was he lying? 2) Trump has said we must accept Syrian refugees and the next day that we must not. Which time was he telling the truth?
3) Trump has said he wants to dismantle Obamacare but he has also said he supports universal health care--which is it?
4) Trump has said he likes Clarence Thomas but attacked Scalia for opposing racial quotas.
5) Trump has switched political parties five times.
6) Trump was for amnesty for illegal aliens for most of his adult life but now he says he is against it
7) Trump was for partial birth abortion for most of his life but now says he is against that too.
I think Trump's dishonesty in his personal life shows he cannot be honest in his public life, and thus he is not suited to being President.
I rather assume the latter judging from the above.
Leni
Give me a break with that birther stuff will ya? IT’S SETTLED. Ted said so.
Consensual sex <> rape
How many of the Founding Fathers were faithful men?
I know not all of them were.
thanks for posting this: newsmachete is my favorite source for reliable, unbiased news, and it’s overlooked far to often by discriminating news consumers at FR.
Nonetheless, it’s important not to forget that only a few weeks ago, Trump singularly upset the whole election apple cart!
Trump set the national agenda by opposing illegal immigration and bringing up other issues that the GOPe and their allies desperately wanted to avoid, and now they can’t.
The GOPe was not prepared for this, and as a consequence they don’t have a clue about what to do, hence their almost universal collapse into a pile of quivering jello, flip-flopping like a bag of Mexican jumping beans dumped on a hot griddle.
Trump has exposed those who pretend to be conservative but are really just fronts for big money establishment campaign donors who purchase their candidates with campaign “donations”.
Trump, by actually being a real man, has exposed the other candidates (Cruz excepting of course) and their allies for the weak little sniveling sellouts that they really are.
Trump’s vociferous truth-telling and fearless neutering of the kommie media have been the catalyst that triggered a massive revolt amongst conservative voters who are infuriated at the GOPe Congress doing absolutely ZERO to stop Obama’s agenda, and suddenly the GOP RINO leadership is in full blown panic mode and in full blown retreat, and the SMALL conservative House contingent smelt blood in the water, took heart, and charged in against a weakened, frightened and paralyzed GOPe leadership, and Boehner was taken out as a sacrificial lamb.
Trump is absolutely correct when he says that without Trump in the race, everything would be same-ol’, same-ol. The Joyful Tippy-Toes Turtle would be creeping closer to the finish line, Boehner would still be safely ensconced as Speaker, and there would be no mention of illegal immigration are any of the issues surrounding it by any politician in either party, other than possibly how critical it would be to pass immigration “reform”.
The media are loath to make the connection, but it’s obvious that the Boehner resignation was yet another falling domino, toppling due to the Trump Effect, because Trump’s unabashed truth-telling and fearless neutering of the kommie media triggered a revolt amongst the great unwashed GOP masses which emboldened a few conservative Congress critters to grow a few pairs.
And our nation wouldn’t even be having ANY of these conversations about illegal immigration and the myriad of other Obammunist issues destroying our country if it wasn’t for Trump. Instead, we’d simply be debating which RINO, GOPe squish would be least likely to be stomped by Hillary, and the GOPe would once again be exhorting the “base” about how critical it is for us to once again vote for the “lesser of two evils”, that is, vote for the GOPe side of the Uniparty coin.
And do note that ALL of the oligarchs and plutocrats are frightened to death of Donald Trump because the billionaires and millionaires can’t buy him like all of the other politicians they routinely purchase, because Trump doesn’t need nor want their money, and the kommie media is frightened to death of him because he isn’t afraid of them either, the bottom line being that Donald Trump can not be controlled by the rich and powerful or the corrupt media, so for anyone who is truly for campaign finance reform and wants to take money out of politics, voting for Trump is the only reasonable choice.
President Trump is really the last hope for this country: if he can’t undo any of the damage wrought by the Obammunists, the U.S.A. is done.
So least we forget, the above, and much more, are called “The Trump Effect”.
i don’t care.
and he’s a lawyer AND a politician so, you can definitely believe what he says.
Kennedy.
Johnson.
Clinton.
Obama with men.
This stuff no longer matters.
Didn't the great one reveal some of his past himself?
As far as I know, no one has asked Larry Flint to ferret out the truth, instead of letting Trump reveal some of the skeletons out of his own closet.
So, is Trump a "sludge slinger" by discussing his own many adulteries?
Here is the full quote, maybe you shouldn’t be so dishonest.
“I even thought, briefly, about approaching Ivana with the idea of an ‘open marriage.’ But I realized there was something hypocritical and tawdry about such an arrangement that neither of us could live with — especially Ivana. She’s too much of a lady.
His kids turned out great, they obviously love him, he has an adoring wife, and he even seems to get along ok with his ex wives. I’ll judge a tree by its fruits. He may be a lot of things, but he’s not an awful human being.
Precisely.
Not to his followers.
Right! Barry’s “father” was a Communist from Kenya living in Hawaii; while Ted’s father was a Communist from Cuba living in Canada. Big difference.
Could care absolutely less about it.
I was referring to the poster of the thread. Want to join in that exercise and expose your faux side also?
When Megyn Kelly asks Trump a disgusting question he should respond with “Unlike you after your second divorce and the lawsuit that cleaned out your ex, I did not begin pandering to the masses with a holier than thou facade of lies “
And then he should continue with the smear by airing three washer loads of her dirty linen
Answer to your question: Yes, it is relevant.
And the Dems surely are busy gathering stories right now to throw at him if he wins the nomination.
Adultery is wrong when it’s a betrayal of trust and commitment between a couple. If a man and a woman knowingly enter an “open” marriage where they flat-out say that they will have other sexual partners, who is being betrayed or lied to?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.