Posted on 12/03/2015 10:09:55 AM PST by OrangeHoof
The media spinners are quickly forming a template for the latest act of terrorism to hit out shores - the killing of 14 people at a community center in San Bernadino, CA.
Stylish Jihadi Ken and Barbie, the Bonnie and Clyde role models for a new century, left this world in a hail of bullets after performing workplace violence against useless white bureaucrats having a "holiday party" (likely with Christian overtones where something offensive like ham or bacon bits may have been served in the casserole).
Ken and Barbie could take no more so they went home and dressed in their best assault clothes with matching his and hers body armor and drove back to the party to smite the infidels in the name of Allah.
Christians were the problem, you see. Surely their thoughtless insults and unwillingness to conform to Sharia Law led to this and now Ken and Barbie are gone from us, but they left behind an infant daughter to carry on their legacy.
A lesson to the world about the intolerance of Christians pushing this "All-American boy" and his Qatarian wife to acts of violence when they could take no more of our persistent slights and suspicious looks.
Don't they make such stylish corpses?
listening to press conference. The media spin is not gonna hold up. This is jihad, plain and simple.
That about sums it up
I’m sure they are planning on spinning this into an anti-white privilege scenario. They were being held back by white people, and not getting the promotion or perks that they were entitled to because they weren’t white.
“Does this body armor make my butt look fat?”
I’ve got some questions.
How long from when Farook left the party till he returned?
Time enough to go home and get “Bonnie” and the equipment?
Time enough to plant IEDs around the complex?
Or was everything in place already at the time of the ‘dispute’?
Been following FR, news, etc. but haven’t seen this yet.
Thanks
I was thinking about the woman leaving her baby with the in-laws while heading off with body armor, guns and IEDs to kill the infidels, with my own kids in the car. And all I could wonder was HOW?
What was the quote that “we will never have peace until they love their children more than they love to die killing us?”
And then I wondered if she decided to go with him because it was easier than being alone to face the backlash, or wanted to be equal in him in the glory of it.
Maybe not her kid. A prop.
Or perhaps her real role, in coming to the US from Saudi, was to be his "handler", and his link to Jihad organizations.
Well they were kind of “Bonnie and Clyde”ed. Maybe they’ll make a romantic movie about them.
Very good observation. If he pre-planted the bombs, the ‘stormed out of the party’ meme goes away.
Bombs attached to RC car...Christmas party...I wonder if there was a toy drive or something like that, for a car to blend into.
I’m actually a little skeptical that its biologically her baby.
It's a complete mystery. Two Muslims shoot up a Christmas party and we have no way whatsoever of knowing why. That's the official line. From the White House, from the media, from any number of somber people at press conferences... We mustn't speculate. Though, maybe it was violent video games. Or too much refined sugar. Or maybe they were bullied, maybe they were lashing back at micro aggressions. Either way, it's the damn NRA's fault. They hadn't dragged any of the bodies out yet and the president was already talking about we've got to have more gun control. We're a bunch of savages and we need stricter laws and we're the only civilized country that has it like this and, damn Republicans, this has to change... This happened because we don't have enough gun control, and your president isn't afraid to say so. He shouts it at every opportunity. That's what progressives call dead people. Opportunity. People die and the Democrats, pulling out their pre-printed talking points, condemn our gun laws. [<irony>] Just like the president condemned the French for lax gun laws after the attacks in Paris. [</irony>] ...The mind-boggling mystery of why the progressive half of America absolutely has to pretend that yesterday's San Bernardino attack wasn't Muslim terrorism... Two Muslims shot up a Christmas party and we're pretty sure it was workplace violence. Probably at its root this is all about islamophobia and cultural disrespect by privileged people in our racist, Christocentric society... Maybe it was angst over climate change. It was just this week that the president said the best way to fight terrorism was by stopping global warming. The pope said terrorism was caused by poor education and a lack of jobs. Absolutely Not A Terrorist #1 had a college degree, a good job with benefits and a pension, and owned a pretty nice house for a 28-year-old. Absolutely Not A Terrorist #2 had been welcomed into the United States and was living a comfortable middle class life and driving a luxury SUV. Of course, Absolutely Not A Terrorists #3 through #21 were also mostly college educated and well off when they started flying airplanes into buildings. But you only thought of that because you are a racist islamophobe... Probably the cause was chlorine in the drinking water, or Donald Trump, or psychiatric medications, or American imperialism, or the Crusades, or somebody put pork on the cafeteria menu... By the way, how about those militarized police, huh? Somebody needs to take them down a peg or two... the last two mass shootings -- at San Bernardino and Colorado Springs -- were both stopped by police in armored vehicles. Clearly yesterday was an example of police excess and I presume by the end of today the cops of California will begin taking enhanced cultural sensitivity classes... Yesterday was a human tragedy. People whose lone offense was attending a Christmas party were gunned down and slaughtered.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.