Posted on 11/10/2015 1:44:06 PM PST by conservativejoy
Pediatric neurosurgeon and 2016 GOP frontrunner Ben Carson has easily fended off most of the spurious attacks from the establishment press, but growing conservative outrage over the Carson campaigns recent announcement of support 'with reservations' for Obama's deeply controversial Trans-Pacific Partnership deal may prove more tricky. Ironically, the Carson camp claimed Carson supported the deal, dubbed 'ObamaTrade' by critics, as a 'counterbalance to Chinas influence' just two days after the Obama administration publicly invited the brutal Communist Chinese dictatorship and Russias Vladimir Putin to join the TPP as well. Among many of Carson's conservative supporters, the pro TPP position is likely to be a bitter pill to swallow, if it can be swallowed at all.
The Obama administration has been promoting the controversial managed-trade scheme as the 'most progressive trade agreement in history.' However, despite the stigma of the 'progressive' label attached to the plot by its own chief architect, top establishment Republicans ,often ridiculed as RINOs among conservatives , have been instrumental on the road to making ObamaTrade a reality. Among other concerns cited by critics is the fact that the TPP regime, which brings together 12 governments including communist and Islamist dictatorships, creates supranational kangaroo courts and regulatory bodies that are purportedly superior to U.S. and state law and court rulings. It also opens the immigration floodgates, and according to U.S. Senator Jeff Sessions (R-Ala.), represents European Union style 'global governance.'
But none of that appears to have fazed Carson, who recently soared to the top of multiple national polls on the Republican Party presidential primary before announcing his support for TPP. Initially, he expressed skepticism over the scheme with the left wing Huffington Post, saying he would not give Obama 'Fast-Track Authority' to ram it through. On November 6, though, the Wall Street Journal, citing Carson campaign spokesman Doug Watts, reported that Carson 'believes the agreement does help to level the playing field in key markets and is important to improve our ties to trading partners in Asia as a counterbalance to China’s influence in the region.' The spokesman also said Carson was 'now inclined to support TPP, with reservations.' In doing so, the Journal reported that Carson was 'aligning himself more with the GOPs establishment wing than with the social conservatives who have powered his campaign.'
And not just aligning himself with the increasingly embattled establishment wing of the party, but with a demonstrable falsehood: the notion that the TPP will serve as a “counterbalance†to Beijing. As The New American reported on November 4, two days before the Carson campaign announced its support for TPP, Secretary of State John Kerry invited the murderous communist regime to join TPP, as well. 'We invite people to come join other initiatives, like the Trans Pacific Partnership, the TPP,' Kerry said in an interview with Russian interstate channel Mir TV. 'We welcome China, we welcome Russia, we welcome other countries who would like to join, as long as they want to raise the standards and live up to the highest standards of protecting people and doing business openly and transparently and accountably.' The Obama State Department later told Breitbart that, 'at this time,' there are 'no talks with other countries on joining the TPP.'
Of the other GOP candidates, most have officially tried to distance themselves from Obama's mammoth, secretly negotiated 5,500-plus page 'agreement' to subvert U.S. sovereignty and self government. The other leading GOP contender, business mogul Donald Trump, recently blasted the TPP as 'insanity,' saying it would be a great deal for Communist China but that only U.S. politicians 'totally controlled by the lobbyists and the special interests' could support it. Mike Huckabee, Bobby Jindal, Senator Ted Cruz, and Carly Fiorina have also slammed the scheme, often using harsh words.
Senator Rand Paul, perhaps hoping to please the establishment wing of the party, shot his campaign in the foot early on among grassroots conservatives, libertarians, and constitutionalists when he called for Obama to 'prioritize' the globalist TPP. He now says he opposes it. Even Senator Marco Rubio, who helped Obama get 'Fast Track Authority' to ram the scheme through, has now distanced himself from it, perhaps sensing the outrage among GOP primary voters. That essentially leaves only unpopular establishment candidates Jeb Bush, John Kasich, and Chris Christie, whose campaigns have largely become a joke among conservative GOP primary voters, still openly supporting Obama's TPP.
Among Democrats, both Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders have claimed to oppose the TPP. Sanders has been opposed from the start. However, Clinton called the scheme the 'gold standard' while serving as Obama's secretary of state, and few credible analysts take seriously Clinton's more recent efforts to distance herself from the U.S. jobs destroying ObamaTrade agenda on the campaign trail.
Now that the full text of the TPP has been released, it is becoming even harder for politicians, especially Republicans, to publicly support the pseudo 'free trade' scheme, which creates essentially a regional government over the nations ensnared in it. 'The text of the Trans Pacific Partnership runs 5,554 pages,' declared Senator Jeff Sessions (R-Ala.) in a statement after the release of the agreement. 'This is, by definition, anti democratic. No individual American has the resources to ensure his or her economic and political interests are safeguarded within this vast global regulatory structure. The predictable and surely desired result of the TPP is to put greater distance between the governed and those who govern. It puts those who make the rules out of reach of those who live under them, empowering unelected regulators who cannot be recalled or voted out of office. In turn, it diminishes the power of the people’s bulwark: their constitutionally formed Congress.'
While much of the establishment media has been trying desperately to demonize Carson with phony non-scandals they invented, analysts said the attacks by the 'mainstream' media have only made his campaign stronger among conservative voters the overwhelming majority of whom distrust the left wing national press to begin with. However, by announcing his support for the TPP, Carson may now have a real problem on his hands. Without the grassroots supporters who have boosted his campaign, Carson would never have become one of the top contenders for president. And yet, those same grassroots supporters are overwhelming and vehemently opposed to surrendering U.S. sovereignty and self government under ObamaTrade. Analysts say TPP will be a major factor in the 2016 race. For Carson, that may be major bad news.
How many issues can a candidate be complete wrong on and still have support? You would have thought Amnesty and Gun Control would have been enough, but now we’ll see if TPP is the silver bullet.
Carson is so much like Obama he is in the wrong primary.
Dr. Ben, you are making a most critical error.
You’re probably holding this position because it’s popular with some of your largest donors. The rich donors more or less live in their own country: one without borders and without the right to act independantly. Look at the mess that the EU is dissolving into due to non-assimilation Muslim Dumping. Do you want that here, in the states too?
He's a vegan...so I bet he agrees with the climate hoax.
With Carson supporting TPP and amnesty, what’s different from Yeb! or Young Yeb!?
Carson should just hang a “FOR SALE” sign around his neck.
On the vote that put the Fast Track bill on Obama’s desk, Cruz voted “No”.
Sure, and he still supported it the first time when it came to voting.
How many times has Trump changed his mind on issues? Cruz gave his reason for his change in position and they were sound.
I don’t know all of Trump’s positions, nor do I support any candidate at the moment, they all have their own issues. I merely brought up the fact that Cruz supported and voted for TPA, then changed his tune later.
He changed his mind and voted against it because the immigration language that he and Sessions wanted wasn’t in the final bill, for one thing. That language would have prevented a lot of the problems in TPP right now, but Rand Paul and another Senator blocked it.
It was never gonna be put in the bill. He knew that back in April when he was talking about how great TPa was for Congress; they were in control and set the negotiations. Then he comes out later after voting for it the first time, that there weren't protections and such, then why the hell did you support it the first time.
On top of all this and his youthful violence- notice how glassy his eyes always are? I think he’s on something.
Cruz voted to bring it to the floor, wherefrom it would definitely pass.
There were far more thsn the 60 votes needed even without Cruz’s vote for cloture. Are you seriously saying that this was not going to be brought to the floor without Cruz?
Who can we thank for that? Paul Ryan and Ted Cruz working hand in hand to insure its passage, belittling conservatives as internet conspiracy kooks, and repeating GOPe talking points.
Cruz knew what he was doing, and just changed his mind at the last minute after fast track was guaranteed.
If Trump or any other Republican candidate were President, they would want Fast Track authority. Now they’ll have it without the Dems being able to block it. Cruz is for Free Trade. Over 5 million jobs in his state of Texas depend on it. He does not support the trade bills being negotiated by Obama because they cede our sovereignty to a panel of reps from all the foreign nations.
To say something that made so much sense was “never going to be” is like saying just give up on every sound principle because there is going to be opposition.
Republicans have always voted for Fast Track. Almost every President has had it for the last 80 years, but somehow now Ted Cruz is the sole reason it passed. Get real! I actually support TPA, but not TPP.
No modifications allowed.
Too much amnesty.
Bye bye Ben.
Granting more authority to a Pres is crazy, from any party and TPA does that. A Pres only has the power to negotiate treaties, TPA is no such thing. The fact that he would even support that principle is telling.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.