Posted on 11/04/2015 4:20:53 AM PST by FR_addict
See Mike Lee's Twitter page and his facebook post
You also gave failed to respond to this
https://twitter.com/SenMikeLee/status/660141795750334464
Republican led Senate failed to oppose it.
Palin and Levin supported him over Obama in 2012. Obviously neither support him now because there are much better alternatives.
Are you really so dense that you don’t understamd this?
Funny.
https://twitter.com/SenMikeLee/status/660141795750334464
Address that please.
Republican majority, does nothing but support Obama in everything.
No opposition, ever.
Yeah, so? Are you saying I’m some kind of fan of these people? If so, then you are very mistaken. I’m just as PO’d as you are and think we need to reform our representation and the party in general. Where we differ is that in the meantime I think it’s counterproductive to spaz out and replace them with a bunch of genuinely leftist Democrats.
And having more Democrats in Congress would have avoided this?
Uh, Republican majority currently?
And they did nothing?
If they are pathologically incapable of opposing Obama, what makes you think they would oppose liberal BS from the “R” labeled liberal Romney?
Romney wouldn’t have pursued Obama’s Iran deal in the first place.
He would have pursued other idiotic dri el and the Republican establishment would have joined him.
The uniparty isn’t just a joke, it is reality.
He would have pusued some idiotic stuff but not on the scale of Obama, which is why it made sense for conservatives including people like Palin to support him.
“He would have pusued some idiotic stuff”
So you are okay with liberalism if it comes from an “R” labeled liberal.
He is and remains a liberal, and supporting a liberal no matter what if he has an “R” label is idiotic.
Liberals are useless.
Look at the Republican majority, they support liberal BS and cater to Obama all the time.
Tell me how that would be better coming from an “R” labeled liberal.
Can a company steal from retirement accounts?
I favor less liberalism over more liberalism, which is why I and other principled conservatives like Palin and Levin wanted to see Romney elected over Obama. You helped elect Obama and we are now living with the disasterous consequences of his presidency.
No, you favor “R” labeled liberals.
Which are in reality no different than Democrats.
Exactly, as proven by the rubber stamp machine that is currently the Republican majority congress.
No, I favor what I just said I favor, for the reasons that I and others have explained many times before. You’re just too dense to understand.
No, you prefer the following:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2877942/posts
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2874131/posts
http://www.ontheissues.org/2012/Mitt_Romney_Gun_Control.htm
http://www.ontheissues.org/2012/Mitt_Romney_immigration.htm
That’s all great and wonderful coming from an “R” labeled liberal, homosexual marriage, homosexual judges, just acceptable if it came from Romney because he’s “lesser evil”, right?
Yes, he was indeed the lesser evil, which is why conservatives like Palin and Levin supported him over Obama. The less damage done to the country the better — a concept that’s lost on you but that makes sense to most sensible people.
Liberalism is liberalism, and supporting it is wrong.
You may be wiling to compromise your principles to rush to support homosexual marriage, gun bans, illegal aliens, higher taxes, homosexual judges, romneycare/obamacare, but I am not.
I supported a conservative.
Not a liberal.
When you vote for a liberal you get more liberalism, not less.
And if congress is pathologically incapable of opposing Obama’s bs, they would not oppose anything from anyone else either.
Sorry this is lost on you.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.