Posted on 11/04/2015 4:20:53 AM PST by FR_addict
See Mike Lee's Twitter page and his facebook post
You seem to be avoiding my point, which is that 1) Palin and Levin endorsed Romney on the grounds that he would be less destructive to the country than Obama, and 2) apparently neither has recanted that endorsement. Which isn’t surprising since Obama has been just as bad as everyone expected.
My position and reasoning are the same as theirs, and as far as I know, neither is a leftist nor a Romneybot. The fact that they don’t want Romney anywhere near the nomination this time around goes without saying. No one does. His only usefulness was as a way of avoiding an unaccountable second term for the America-hating leftist Obama, who you helped to elect.
It’s kind of incredible that you guys need to have this stuff explained to you.
And then she said he had to go away as someone new is needed.
She also regretted supporting him.
What’s wrong, aren’t people allowed to not support liberal Mitt in your world?
There is no such thing as voting against Obama.
There is only voting FOR one person or the other.
And Mitt supported gun bans, abortion, homosexual marriage, illegal immigration, and higher taxes.
DO YOU support those too?
A vote FOR Mitt was a vote FOR those too.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2877942/posts
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2874131/posts
http://www.ontheissues.org/2012/Mitt_Romney_Gun_Control.htm
http://www.ontheissues.org/2012/Mitt_Romney_immigration.htm
I’ve found four or five different versions of the article which I believe is the one in which you claim she says she regrets “supporting” Romney, but I don’t see where she says that. Can you link to the article and quote the statement?
Did you, perchance, look at Brietbart for the text I quoted where she said we need someone new?
The END of the brietbart link would look like this:
2015/01/15/sarah-palin-on-potential-romney-16-run-we-need-new-blood/
Or just websearch for this tidbit:
“We need new energy. We need new blood,” Palin told Inside Edition when asked if Romney should make a third run for the White House. “We need new ideas.”
Oh, and a vote for Romney was a vote in support of the following:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2877942/posts
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2874131/posts
http://www.ontheissues.org/2012/Mitt_Romney_Gun_Control.htm
http://www.ontheissues.org/2012/Mitt_Romney_immigration.htm
And I note that you STILL have yet to address that the RINO LED SENATE failed to stop the following:
https://twitter.com/SenMikeLee/status/660141795750334464
IF they are completely pathologically incapable of stopping that, what makes you think they would behave any differently under an “R” Labeled Liberal?
Quote the line where she recants her endorsement of Romney in the 2012 election.
It goes without saying that she doesn’t want want him in the race now. No one does. That’s not what’s in question here.
Ah, if it doesn’t exactly suit what you want to hear it didn’t happen?
Lol.
Yeah, that’s what I thought.
Thanks for playing.
Palin and levin were wrong. It cost them integrity and credibility.
You COULDN’T explain anything to me. I wouldn’t beliee you if you told me water was wet. Why? Because I have watched you lie repeatedly on this forum about myself, Romney, conservatives and the events before, during and after the 12 election.
You have no credibility to explain anything because you have the integrity of Mitt Romney and you repeatedly show me that. I did not believe him and he proved not 18 hours after his fail that I was correct in my voting. I wouldn’t believe you as you continue to reinvent reality 3 years later.
“I’ve found four or five different versions”
Yeah, thanks for playing.
Have you never heard of google?
http://www.google.com/#q=Palin+romney+inside+edition+new.blood
Huffington Post, Breitbart, Right Scoop, NY daily News and a few others reported on Palin’s recent comments. I looked through several and none quote her as taking back her endorsement of Romney against Obama.
“I’ve found four or five different versions”
And yet you refuse to accept that you are reading it.
Yeah, thanks for playing.
But what would one expect from someone who voted FOR the following:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2877942/posts
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2874131/posts
http://www.ontheissues.org/2012/Mitt_Romney_Gun_Control.htm
http://www.ontheissues.org/2012/Mitt_Romney_immigration.htm
Pingy
Okay, well, anyone interested can look at the articles and see for themselves what Palin said and see how it fits with what’s been written in this thread.
Yes.
And since she did say he needs to go away...
...why keep claiming she supports him?
Obviously I’m not claiming she supports him. Read my posts.
What I’m claiming is that she hasn’t recanted her support for him over Obama in 2012. Which isn’t surprising since Obama has been just as bad as expected in his second term. There’s no reason to recant.
No one including Palin wants Romney in the race now since he would be competing with real conservatives like Ted Cruz for the nomination. This is different from the 2012 general election when Romney was the only alternative to Obama the America hating leftist, who you helped elect.
See how that works?
You really don’t want the post where you said Palin and Levin support him linked.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.