To: Swordmaker
Apple hasn’t already given the backdoor key to 0bama?
2 posted on
10/25/2015 6:40:15 PM PDT by
Paladin2
(my non-desktop devices are no longer allowed to try to fix speling and punctuation, nor my gran-mah.)
To: Swordmaker
4 posted on
10/25/2015 6:44:03 PM PDT by
Vendome
(Don't take life so seriously-you won't live through it anyway-Enjoy Yourself ala Louis Prima)
To: Swordmaker
The obstructers of justice [Lois Lerner felonies] in the Department of Justice can shove it up their felonious Obamas.
Don't make us pull this van over, DOJ. The adults are getting sick of your backseat whining.
5 posted on
10/25/2015 6:47:28 PM PDT by
kiryandil
(Maya: "Liberalism Is What Smart Looks Like to Stupid People")
To: Swordmaker
This is sounding a lot like Apple trying desperately to avoid admitting that they’ve added their own secret backdoors and they don’t want their users to know.
If Apple had been using seeing encryption, as they should have been, they’d just have said that they were unable to recover the data.
7 posted on
10/25/2015 6:48:32 PM PDT by
jdege
To: Swordmaker
Looks like Apple cannot even break their own encryption.
Well get the NSA to give it a try. ;-)
8 posted on
10/25/2015 6:50:23 PM PDT by
Red Steel
To: Swordmaker
How funny. Apple users think the DOJ should be far more open when WE THE PEOPLE ask for information.
To: Swordmaker
The question is how many companies have given back doors to Obama?
To: Swordmaker
I guess they aren’t interested in the data on my Samsung flip phone—LOL!
11 posted on
10/25/2015 6:52:44 PM PDT by
basil
( God bless the USA!)
To: Swordmaker
I guess they aren’t interested in the data on my Samsung flip phone—LOL!
12 posted on
10/25/2015 6:52:44 PM PDT by
basil
( God bless the USA!)
To: ~Kim4VRWC's~; 1234; Abundy; Action-America; acoulterfan; AFreeBird; Airwinger; Aliska; altair; ...
The DOJ seems to think that Apple merely has to change its End User License Agreement to allow them to have a means of getting into iPhones, iPads, or iPod touches with a backdoor, and that Apple is merely using legal objections in claiming they literally cannot comply with any court orders to assist opening iOS devices for search warrants. Even the statement that "Apple . . . claimed it would be nearly impossible to it to access the data on a passcode-locked iOS device running iOS 8 or later" demonstrates the abyss that separates the technological gap between the lawyers arguing this case and the mathematicians who have constructed the 256 bit AES encryption Apple uses to lock their devices. When entangled with the UUID of the device, with multiple-attempt lockouts, it is, in practice, impossible to break the encryption of such an encrypted device, not merely an academic legal exercise. PING!

Apple's Privacy Encryption
Under Government Assault
Ping!
The Latest Apple/Mac/iOS Pings can be found by searching Keyword ApplePingList on Freerepublics Search.
If you want on or off the Mac Ping List, Freepmail me.
14 posted on
10/25/2015 6:53:06 PM PDT by
Swordmaker
( This tag line is a Microsoft insult free zone... but if the insults to Mac users continue...)
To: Swordmaker
Play the audio of R Lee Ermey’s lines from Full Metal Jacket for them.
Why?
Oh, no reason.
They could stand to hear the DYSD line on repeat for hours every time they ask for back doors into my papers.
15 posted on
10/25/2015 6:55:26 PM PDT by
Darksheare
(Those who support liberal "Republicans" summarily support every action by same.)
To: Swordmaker
apple’can set it so users could erase their calls and there would be no way to get’that info back. regular phones dont record the conversations. course nsa has its hands up the ass of the phonecos. but still.
who says our private phones have to be able to be opened up to fedgov.
fuch fedgov. let them try to decrypt. theyve got the nsa “experts” and infinite resources. if he sold meth someone had to buy it. sheesh. cant even do actual real policework.
21 posted on
10/25/2015 7:19:33 PM PDT by
Secret Agent Man
(Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
To: Swordmaker
The specific case in which the U.S. government needs an iPhone unlocked relates to executing a search warrant on a suspect indicted for possession of methamphetamine. I'm not sure I understand that argument. Either the guy was in possession of the methamphetamine or he wasn't. They're not going to find any inside his phone.
BTW, if by unlocking the phone, they mean accessing its content, why can't they just cut off the guy's finger and unlock it with his fingerprint? I'm sure the importance of the case warrants an amputation.
25 posted on
10/25/2015 7:34:17 PM PDT by
Tau Food
(Never give a sword to a man who can't dance.)
To: Swordmaker
The company also noted, however, that even if it were possible, it would not feel comfortable doing so I thought Apple couldn't unlock a phone anymore, period. Why the equivocation? Is it actually possible?
28 posted on
10/25/2015 7:46:47 PM PDT by
Defiant
(I wouldn't have to mansplain if it weren't for all those wymidiots.)
To: Swordmaker
I wonder if the ability to access backdoor could be added through some kind of stealth update?
30 posted on
10/25/2015 7:53:43 PM PDT by
gogeo
(If you are Tea Party, the GOPee does not want you.)
To: Swordmaker
I think the DOJ should shut up and prosecute the IRS and Hillary. Go after real criminals you corrupt bastards at the DOJ.
39 posted on
10/25/2015 8:52:40 PM PDT by
Nuc 1.1
(Nuc 1 Liberals aren't Patriots. Remember 1789!)
To: Swordmaker
Our government wants to spy on us by a request rather than a warrant. Apple to their credit is doing what it can to make the government get a warrant. Google on the other hand probably gives the government everything. Looks out here comes CISA to rob you of even more rights!!!
45 posted on
10/25/2015 9:34:52 PM PDT by
ColdSteelTalon
(Light is fading to shadow, and casting its shroud over all we have known...)
To: Swordmaker
The Police State marches on.
Countdown to tyranny. It’s coming and it isn’t a long way off either.
46 posted on
10/25/2015 9:43:20 PM PDT by
Freedom_Is_Not_Free
(The Confederate Flag is the new "N" word.)
To: Swordmaker
And with due process they can be. DOJ whines too much.
71 posted on
10/27/2015 12:29:39 PM PDT by
discostu
(Up-Up-Down-Down-Left-Right-Left-Right B, A, Start)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson