Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: PROCON

Bringing back the Coke and chip vending machines will more than make up the shortfall.


2 posted on 10/16/2015 11:54:24 AM PDT by Snickering Hound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Snickering Hound

This is a.good example, of an area of life where the federal government should not be involved.

We all are concerned about what our kids are eating. But there’s a big issue of why some bureaucratic or Michelle Obama should be regulating what kids have for lunch.


7 posted on 10/16/2015 11:58:35 AM PDT by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Snickering Hound
We had a candy machine. So I made friends with the candy man.

Did you know that little old nuns (school nurse) can be bribed with chocolate? Only good for a 45 minute nap though.

10 posted on 10/16/2015 11:59:43 AM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Snickering Hound

At that age, studdents need CALORIES and FAT


20 posted on 10/16/2015 12:06:05 PM PDT by Cletus.D.Yokel (BREAKING: Boy Scouts of America Changes Corporate Identity to "Scouting for Boys in America")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Snickering Hound
"Business has been booming in Bozeman High School's cafeteria since its board members voted to drop the National School Lunch Program in a bid to keep students from leaving campus to eat."

But don't trust those Bozite luggage handlers.


25 posted on 10/16/2015 12:09:06 PM PDT by treetopsandroofs (Had FDR been GOP, there would have been no World Wars, just "The Great War" and "Roosevelt's Wars".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Snickering Hound

Time to return the lunch menu to the locals. Michelle’s crap is a flop. And kids need a lot more protein and calories than in that crappy diet. And it looks like “used food”.


41 posted on 10/16/2015 12:32:41 PM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Snickering Hound; All
Thank you for referencing that article Snickering Hound. Please bear in mind that the following critique is directed at the article and not at you.

”… relinquishes $120,000 in federal funding and drops Michelle Obama's lunch program"

FR: Never Accept the Premise of Your Opponent’s Argument

Regarding this so-called federal funding, patriots need to bear the following in mind. The states have never delegated to the feds, expressly via the Constitution, the specific power to regulate, tax and spend for any aspect of INTRAstate schooling, including providing funding for lunches. So the “federal” funding that Montana has refused is arguably Montana state revenues that corrupt Congress stole from the states in the form of unconstitutional federal taxes.

In other words, Montana would probably be using its own revenues to subsidize school lunches — if the feds weren’t stealing this funding from Montana. Likewise for the other states. And the feds likely provide this unconstitutional funding to win votes from low-information voters, voters who don’t understand that the feds don’t have the constitutional authority to provide such funding.

More specifically, voters don’t understand that the corrupt, post-17th Amendment Senate is not doing its job to protect the states as the Founding States had intended for the Senate to do. Senators should have killed the bill that appropriated funds for the school meal program. Instead, the Senate is helping the likewise corrupt House to pass unconstitutional appropriations bills, bills that not only steal 10th Amendment-protected state powers but also state revenues associated with those powers as evidenced by the FLOTUS’s funding for school meal programs.

The ill-conceived 17th Amendment needs to disappear, and corrupt senators who help to pass unconstitutional House appropriations bills along with it.

46 posted on 10/16/2015 12:39:59 PM PDT by Amendment10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Snickering Hound
You all do realize this is the most liberal and one of the most affluent school districts in the state.

This is not a story about conservatives saying no...its a story about liberals saying not for my kid.

There are 10’s 100’s of thousands of school districts out there but one of the most liberal in the nation pushes back...and that's somehow a victory for conservatives ..give me break

86 posted on 10/16/2015 5:41:33 PM PDT by montanajoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson