Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

How an Actress Made $1B Tapping Into a Chemophobe Nation’s Fears
Chem.Info ^ | 6/22/2015 | Meagan Parrish

Posted on 06/23/2015 9:27:01 AM PDT by Rio

If you wanted to clear a room full of nervous mothers of small children you could to it by yelling one word: “Chemicals!”

Jessica Alba — famous for her roles in “Fantastic Four” and “Little Fockers” — knows this, and has built a booming business around modern, hand-wringing parents who worry about the prevalence of chemicals in everything, from toys to food.

The company she co-founded, called The Honest Co., launched in 2012 selling personal care and home products for little ones like diapers, bath products, laundry detergent and more — all made with nontoxic ingredients. The company now touts more than a 100 products and recently signaled they’d be adding a beauty line soon.

The success of The Honest Co. has paid off royally — within two years the company’s revenue was near $150 million and this year crossed the $1 billion mark — and made Alba a media darling. Alba can be seen on this month’s cover of Forbes with the headline “America’s Richest Self-Made Women.”

Alba has also used her success to try to influence debates around chemical safety and regulation.

Last week she was on Capitol Hill in Washington, D.C., meeting with Senators such as Charles Schumer (D-NY) and Barbara Boxer (D-CA) to discuss the two competing reform bills to the 1976 Toxic Substances Control Act, and suggesting that neither option goes far enough in regulating dangerous chemicals.

Weeks ago she also announced that she was funding research into whether or not there’s a link between common chemicals and autism. The study will measure the impact of exposure to household chemicals during fetal development by sawing into the teeth of kids diagnosed with autism and comparing them to children without a developmental disorder.

While she is generally and rightfully applauded for her foray into the debates around chemical safety, it also seems like some fear mongering is at work.

A major cynic would read all this and say that Alba is stoking consumers’ anxiety about chemicals to hurt her competitors and boost her own company’s success. I’m not quite that pessimistic. But I do see a problem with some of the alarmist rhetoric Alba has been using.

Here is a quote from a recent talk she gave on her success, where she explained why she’s raised the red flag about chemicals: “My mother had cervical cancer at 23. My grandmother died of stomach cancer. I grew up with people being ill. This has got to stop. My friends in their 20s shouldn’t have a hard time getting pregnant.”

So what Alba seems to be implying is that there must be a link between cancer, infertility and “people being ill” with all the chemicals we put in household goods. Basically, people she knows have been sick so it must be related to chemicals. This sounds pretty scary — and not exactly the voice of careful reason in a country currently going through a major reckoning with chemical regulations.

But let’s examine the notion for a moment and look at the link between chemicals and cancer.

To be sure, chemicals including asbestos and glyphosate (which is used in pesticides such as Roundup) have been deemed carcinogens — but not for the cancers she mentions. And while environmental factors are considered to play a role in increasing the odds of getting many cancers, there are so many other factors at play — genetics, random gene mutations, etc. — that passing it off as a problem related to “chemicals” is irresponsible.

In fact, how often do you hear of chemical exposure causing cervical cancer? Probably never because the only chemical linked to cervical cancer — tetrachloroethylene — only affects about the 1 percent of the population who are exposed to it through occupational dry cleaning or metal degreasing.

This isn’t to say chemicals are never dangerous. The truth is there are always new studies revealing the harm of certain chemicals.

But sometimes those studies don’t take into account the level of exposure needed to be harmed by those chemicals. This, for example, has frequently been the case with bisphenol A (BPA), the plastics additive often cited as a potential culprit of infertility — one of the other chemical woes she mentions.

So if you don’t read between the headlines, chemicals do sound like the bogeyman. And unfortunately Alba is often just adding to that alarmist noise.

Here’s another frequently used quote of Alba’s: “There are 80,000 chemicals in consumer products — chemicals that frankly haven’t been tested.” The company’s “Honestly Free Guarantee” also says “We believe the products people use should be safe and non-toxic (surprisingly, many companies don’t!)”

Or read it this way: 80,000 chemicals haven’t been tested, so they must be dangerous. Again, it’s a pretty simple worldview that plays well into the company’s marketing, but doesn’t quite live up to reality.

Plenty of chemicals are hazardous and I think everyone working on regulation reform agrees that the process needs to be strengthened in the U.S. But to suggest we’re living in a wild west of chemical anarchy — when several federal agencies like the EPA test and study chemicals — isn’t completely accurate.

Plus, there’s this other pesky fact: Plenty of chemicals we encounter every day are safe and they make our lives better.

Don’t believe me? Ask Alba herself. The Honest Co. still uses chemicals in their products — chemicals like polyolefin, a popular plastic used to help give the company’s diapers a comfy waistband. Other chemicals like phenoxyethenol, methylisothiazolinone and polyurethane are also in The Honest Co.’s products.

Why? Because they work and they’re safe.

I’m all about being chemically conscious — but not chemically paranoid.

I also salute Alba’s success — I even have some Honest Co. products at home! — and I think consumers should be more informed about what’s in the products they use.

But just because an ingredient has a long word you can’t pronounce, that doesn’t mean it’s going to kill you. And just because Alba’s company has been successful selling pricey products sans chemicals, it doesn’t mean she needs to freak out moms to make a buck.


TOPICS: Miscellaneous; Science
KEYWORDS: alarmism; alba; chemicals; goddess; honest; honestco; hottie; jessicaalba; sexy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-107 next last
To: goodwithagun

” That said, I don’t need a law or any government interference to enforce it.”

Unfortunately you do because the big companies will use their lobbyists and lawyers to hide the contents of their products if its not beneficial to them.

They are happy to use the government to keep us ignorant.


21 posted on 06/23/2015 9:45:07 AM PDT by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver
"How is it irrational to want to eliminate unnecessary chemicals out of your life. Who the F are you to determine that for other people?"

Who the F are you to determine they are unnecessary?

It is irrational to assign causes to things without sufficient evidence.

22 posted on 06/23/2015 9:46:02 AM PDT by mlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog

$1 billion says its Alba they are listening to.


23 posted on 06/23/2015 9:46:35 AM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (A free society canÂ’t let the parameters of its speech be set by murderous Islamists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: all the best
Yep, they ain’t ever going to tell you the stuff they create, and are paid to create, aren’t good for you.

Yeah because their children don't eat or drink the toxic materials they foist on the rest of us.

Thats a dark energy you have fomenting deep inside of you. Good luck with that.

24 posted on 06/23/2015 9:47:22 AM PDT by corkoman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: mlo
It is irrational to assign causes to things without sufficient evidence.

Woe to those hoping that evidence would be included in these discussions. Why do the hard thing when blind emotionalism is effortless?

25 posted on 06/23/2015 9:49:20 AM PDT by corkoman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Rio

“... Alba can be seen on this month’s cover of Forbes with the headline “America’s Richest Self-Made Women.””

Dang. There goes all hope that she would do a steamy topless scene to squeeze out a few more years of Hollywood stardom.


26 posted on 06/23/2015 9:50:01 AM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mlo

” Who the F are you to determine they are unnecessary? “

I’m the caretaker of this body God gave me.

” It is irrational to assign causes to things without sufficient evidence.”

Whats irrational is believing that companies with a proven propensity for misinforming and large bureaucracies will understand all of the details let alone tell their customers negative aspects of their products.

I don’t have to be a PhD in physics to know that stepping off a cliff is dangerous.


27 posted on 06/23/2015 9:50:26 AM PDT by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: KC_Lion

Agreed


28 posted on 06/23/2015 9:50:55 AM PDT by petro45acp (Grubbers "stupid" electorate is starting to look very much like Romney's 47%. Just sayin...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: GrandJediMasterYoda

I wonder how many of these women are teacher’s union members? I always wonder how Obama gets those people that he uses as extras for all his carefully arranged Hollywood productions? I think most of them are carefully picked from Democrat supporters, you know the same way the Hillary staged those fake “meet the real people” diner get together. It turned out that they were all Democrat donors and operations. What a laugh!


29 posted on 06/23/2015 9:52:30 AM PDT by cradle of freedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog
Who you gonna believe....a bunch of PhD’s in Chemical Engineering, or Jessica Alba?

That depends. Is Alba wearing a bikini?

All joking aside, good for her. With all the cheap crap we're getting from China, the concern of toxic chemicals used in the manufacturing is real.

Case in point, just the other day I opened up a play tent that my 4-year old son received from Amazon for his birthday. Made in China, of course. It smelled like insecticide and I had to take it outside to air out.

I have no trust in the Chinese to deliver us products free from toxic chemicals. Cheap comes with a price.

30 posted on 06/23/2015 9:58:11 AM PDT by Drew68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Rio

Where are Alba’s products made?


31 posted on 06/23/2015 9:58:55 AM PDT by donna (Polls are mob rule . . . faked.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: corkoman

They have a totally different mindset as a result of their education and background. Totally idiotic and ignorant to pretend that all those chemicals are harmless.


32 posted on 06/23/2015 10:02:18 AM PDT by all the best
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: donna
The Honest Company on the wwweb. Good luck finding an answer to your question there ...
33 posted on 06/23/2015 10:07:10 AM PDT by NorthMountain ("The time has come", the Walrus said, "to talk of many things")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: all the best

“They have a totally different mindset as a result of their education and background.”

You mean they actually know the difference between a harmful chemical and one that just sounds scary?


34 posted on 06/23/2015 10:08:36 AM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: corkoman

No liberal/Democrat/progressive would do anything bad for the country that they and their children live in. Totally idiotic.


35 posted on 06/23/2015 10:09:06 AM PDT by all the best
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Boogieman; all the best

So unless you’re a chemist you can’t have an opinion on what chemicals to ingest? Does that mean you have to be an economist to determine which 401K plan to use?

Complete ignorant buffoonery


36 posted on 06/23/2015 10:11:51 AM PDT by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver
Its the free market in action, people wanted it and she delivered. Sounds like you are anti-free market

Market and advertise as such. But don't go to the world crying wolf to enhance your products' sales.

37 posted on 06/23/2015 10:12:13 AM PDT by IYAS9YAS (Has anyone seen my tagline? It was here yesterday. I seem to have misplaced it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: IYAS9YAS

“Market and advertise as such. But don’t go to the world crying wolf to enhance your products’ sales.”

Her competitors go to the world and cry wolf. Why shouldn’t she be able to communicate her market differentiation?

Seriously, why the heck are so many “conservatives” so willing to trust these massive global conglomerates and their lackies?

Whats good about having unnecessary chemicals in your body?


38 posted on 06/23/2015 10:15:00 AM PDT by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver

“So unless you’re a chemist you can’t have an opinion on what chemicals to ingest?”

Sure, you can have an opinion. It might not be an informed one, but you’re free to have one.


39 posted on 06/23/2015 10:15:27 AM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Rio

You know what? If a product can be made safer, why not. I remember back in the day, the country was having air pollution problems...we no longer have that in most of the country (LA exception). I think it is ok to try to improve on things especially a private company. The government is the problem not private companies that aren’t forcing you to buy things.


40 posted on 06/23/2015 10:16:47 AM PDT by napscoordinator (Walker for President 2016. The only candidate with actual real RESULTS!!!!! The rest...talkers!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-107 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson