Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Texas judges make it harder to fight patent trolls
EndGadget ^ | June 11, 2015

Posted on 06/11/2015 6:23:03 PM PDT by Swordmaker

Federal courts might have made it harder for patent trolls to sue over vague ideas, but the Eastern District of Texas (the trolls' preferred venue) just put the ball back in their court. Some judges in the region now demand that the targets of these lawsuits get permission before they file motions to dismiss cases based on abstract concepts. If the defendants don't show "good cause" for needing those motions, the lawsuits go ahead -- and historically, that means that the trolls either win their cases or extract settlements from companies unwilling to endure the costs of a prolonged legal battle.

If there's any consolation, it's that these judges will likely have to mend their ways at some point. As the Electronic Frontier Foundation notes, defendants have both the right and precedents to ask for a motion to dismiss. Judges aren't allowed to establish rules that clash with those on the federal level, so these Texas officials are technically breaking the law. The question is whether or not there will be an effective challenge to these Eastern District rules before a large number of companies are asked to defend against patent trolls with their hands tied.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Computers/Internet
KEYWORDS: texas

1 posted on 06/11/2015 6:23:03 PM PDT by Swordmaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Swordmaker
Judges in the East Texas District in Tyler Texas thumb their noses as the Federal appellate decision that eased the ability of defendants in patent infringement suits and created rules requiring them to get permission to file motions before filing said motions, contrary to the appeal decision. — PING!


Patent Troll Ping!

If you want on or off the Mac Ping List, Freepmail me.

2 posted on 06/11/2015 6:26:27 PM PDT by Swordmaker ( This tag line is a Microsoft insult free zone... but if the insults to Mac users continue...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Swordmaker

Judge Gohmert’s Smith county office is in Tyler on the Loop. I was in Tyler back in November, wanted to stop in and just pass onto his staff that there are “Part-Time Texans” back home in Western PA that wish he was their congresscritter.


3 posted on 06/11/2015 6:32:51 PM PDT by Rodamala
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Swordmaker

The Federal Circuit will squash this. Basically, this district is in the cross hairs of every reform law and the Supreme Court. Good luck to them.


4 posted on 06/11/2015 6:39:53 PM PDT by FlipWilson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Swordmaker

Trial lawyers are the top political donors in Texas and the Democrat Party is their party of choice.

Some years ago, a handful of private lawyers in sweet with the Democrats got a billion dollar payout in the states’ tobacco settlement.


5 posted on 06/11/2015 6:42:18 PM PDT by a fool in paradise (Funny how Hollywood's 'No Nukes' crowd has been silent during Obama's Iranian nuclear negotiations.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Swordmaker

Die, patent trolls. They are a criminal organization every bit as much as the mafia. They just have a law degree.


6 posted on 06/11/2015 6:50:49 PM PDT by doug from upland (Obama and the leftists - destroying our country one day at a time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: a fool in paradise

The whole American Bar Association is a Democrat cabal.


7 posted on 06/11/2015 6:59:03 PM PDT by RushIsMyTeddyBear (The White House is now known as "Casa Blanca".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: a fool in paradise

Some years ago, a handful of private lawyers in sweet with the Democrats
got a billion dollar payout in the states’ tobacco settlement.

*************

Try #$3.3 billion to five lawyers.....

http://www.deseretnews.com/article/729113/5-lawyers-agree-to-33-billion-for-work-on-Texas-tobacco-suit.html?pg=all


8 posted on 06/11/2015 7:04:18 PM PDT by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: FlipWilson

Given that Texas Instruments is in the state (for now), this won’t go over well.


9 posted on 06/11/2015 7:44:18 PM PDT by The Antiyuppie ("When small men cast long shadows, then it is very late in the day".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: a fool in paradise

“Some years ago, a handful of private lawyers in sweet with the Democrats got a billion dollar payout in the states’ tobacco settlement.”

That isn’t how that happened. Democrats had nothing to do with it. This group of lawyers took the tobacco case FREE OF CHARGE. If the lawyers had lost, they got nothing. They won, and got those many millions of dollars.


10 posted on 06/11/2015 7:51:53 PM PDT by Marcella (TED CRUZ Prepping can save your life today. Going Galt is freedom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Marcella

They came in near the end, by my recollection, they weren’t the only lawyers on the case, and they were among THE top donors in the state.

Good riddance John O’Quinn.

http://www.tortreform.com/blog/lingering-odor-texas-tobacco-settlement

The Lingering Odor of the Texas Tobacco Settlement

...Buried under the politics of fifteen years, the story is so cold that only a bolt of lightning could bring it back to life. But lest we forget, the national tobacco settlement was and remains—by far—the largest litigation money transfer in the history of plaintiff litigation. It wound up putting billions of dollars in the pockets of hundreds of plaintiff lawyers across the country, only a few of whom did much to earn any of it.

Folklore to the contrary, the tobacco companies did not cough up the billions of dollars paid to the states. Rather, under the sophisticated guidance of tobacco lawyers, bankers, and a core group of shrewd plaintiff lawyers from South Carolina and Mississippi, the litigants arranged to shift the entire cost of the settlement—trillions of dollars over the life of the settlement—not onto the tobacco companies, but onto smokers compelled to pay a de facto tax to the settling tobacco companies through price increases.

At the time, our state’s fourth estate simply swooned at the notion of dubious Sir Galahads—like asbestos litigation lawyers Walter Umphrey and Wayne Reaud of Beaumont—bringing Dragon Big Tobacco to its knees. They showered Sir Walter and the other knights of the Texas Tobacco Five—John Eddie Williams, John O’Quinn and Harold Nix—with praise in every news story.

Very few in the media noticed the questionable odor of the deal or the seemingly inexplicable provisions agreed to by the tobacco companies. For the sake of history, I will review just the high points:...


11 posted on 06/11/2015 8:13:12 PM PDT by a fool in paradise (Funny how Hollywood's 'No Nukes' crowd has been silent during Obama's Iranian nuclear negotiations.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson