Posted on 05/23/2015 7:00:26 PM PDT by Rockitz
From the first sudden, and quite dramatic, appearance of the fanatical Islamic group known as ISIS which was largely unheard of until a year ago, on the world's stage and which promptly replaced the worn out and tired al Qaeda as the world's terrorist bogeyman, we suggested that the "straight to beheading YouTube clip" purpose behind the Saudi Arabia-funded Islamic State was a simple one: use the Jihadists as the vehicle of choice to achieve a political goal: depose of Syria's president Assad, who for years has stood in the way of a critical Qatari natural gas pipeline, one which could dethrone Russia as Europe's dominant - and belligerent - source of energy, reaching an interim climax with the unsuccessful Mediterranean Sea military build up of 2013, which nearly resulted in quasi-world war.
...
But it's one thing to speculate; it's something entirely different to have hard proof.
And while speculation was rife that just like the CIA-funded al Qaeda had been used as a facade by the US to achieve its own geopolitical and national interests over the past two decades, so ISIS was nothing more than al Qaeda 2.0, there was no actual evidence of just this.
That may all have changed now when a declassified secret US government document obtained by the public interest law firm, Judicial Watch, shows that Western governments deliberately allied with al-Qaeda and other Islamist extremist groups to topple Syrian dictator Bashir al-Assad.
....
(Excerpt) Read more at zerohedge.com ...
I agree, the Fast and Furious scandal must make almost any allegation against Obama quite feasible. And an ISIS link is straight out of the same playbook.
This administration, AND ALL THE REPUBLICANS WHO SUPPORT IT, has a lot of blood on its hands.
They are just now figuring this out?
The CIA did not create Bin Laden, the Saudi funded independently Bin Laden with friends in the Pakistani IsI.
BTTT
The lawful, honest and honorably FBI, CIA, DIA, etc... agents are going to have to go after these Benedict Arnolds that are unlawfully operating within our government against the U.S. Constitution and the American people.
Make no mistake... these Benedict Arnolds have committed HIGH TREASON.
This explains the lame a$$ response to Benghazi.
This also explains why EVERYONE KNOWS..... the U.S. is not seriously fighting ISIS.
This explains why ISIS has U.S. weapons. Anyone that has ever served time in the U.S. military knows these weapons need to be maintained. There is NO WAY a rag tag group could do this without some country, Saudi Arabia, funding and training it.
The Administration does not want to take out the Saudi Arabian “Proxy” army. AKA ISIS... formerly known as Al Qaeda.
This article and the links in the article nicely puts it all together.
This also explains why the Fast and Furious happened, IRS gate, the NSA spying, etc....
We the people have been betrayed.
Didn’t say I believed it, said I would not be surprised if it were true.
I also said the hatred ISIS has for Christians plays right into the hands of elitists in this nation.
Am I wrong?
Created for such a purpose? No. But they certainly pumped all those arms to all those fanatics.
Beck had the story on Benghazi the NEXT DAY.
We honestly do not know what is going on over there. Who to trust (none of them) and who to arm ... yet we ARM and TRAIN people who we have no idea of their loyalties, except we can be sure they are not going to be loyal to us.
And nearly everyone is eager to send our men and women in to lay down their lives for this mess?
Beyond sad.
I would not be sorry or surprised to see a US military mutiny if they are asked to go in and fight ... one sect vs another sect over that hot mess .. for what? Just to say we “did something”?
Why should we ask our military to go in and fight people who we have ARMED and TRAINED ?
May as well ask them to don suicide vests.
If asked to do this I hope our military would mutiny before allowing stupid politicians to misuse them in this way.
Also we should not be asking our military to help one side or another get the upper hand in a RELIGIOUS CIVIL WAR that has been going on for over 1000 years.
No, it started in Iraq. It was essentially al-Qaeda in Iraq.
we didn't create isis, we 'aligned' with the other muslim groups.
this isn't news. it was reported more then a year ago that we had joined forces with the islamists.
why is a different problem. this article tries to say it was to unseat a single president.. when, in fact, it has destabilized the entire region, pushing it closer to a caliphate.
i've believed for years, the legacy 0bama has been chasing is to be one of the founding members of the next 0ttoman empire, complete with nukes.
Hilarious.
Nut-job Conspiracy Theory Ping!
To get onto The Nut-job Conspiracy Theory Ping List you must threaten to report me to the Mods if I don't add you to the list...
He's got hiiiiigh hopes. He's got hiiiiiiieeeeyigh hopes. He's got hot apple pie in the sky.......
Nope. Any special character codes force HTML in the entire post.
Mega-props for fixing it.
Name him, ping him...
Wow. So where does the Free Syrian Army fall in? Do they even have anything to do with ISIS?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.