Has anyone noticed that David Corn doesn't look very human? The word "simian" comes to mind.
What did they expect? O’Reilly’s methodology is punch-in-the-nose bloviation.
One of my clients actually SUBSCRIBES to that rag. I saw it on the coffee table and almost woofed my lunch.
I didn’t think ANYONE actually read that thing.
The only time I ever touched a copy I looked at the adds I the back. Some “artist” was trying to sell oil paintings of Reagan morphed with a chimp for $600. With so little understanding of the market no wonder these people are communists.
Billy O said what he said and he can get as mad and as blustery as he wants, he can go back and pull out everything he’s said and leave it at that as evidence.
I don’t really care, but it seems to me the left is just continuing in the line of trying to compare fallen Democrats’ acts with others who aren’t on their side to lessen the import of what their guy did. For him to bluster and moan about it just tells them they have something going they should keep going. He should just shut up and let them pull out the true words he spoke and leave it at that.
Exactly why they are trying to get attention by attacking O'Reilly.
So Mother Dingbat is demanding the O'Reilly answer their questions? Gee, maybe could have asked questions BEFORE they ran the story.
I'd tell Mother Dingbat to GFT.
Another good thing..., sorry, I can't think of anything else.
Mother Goose and David Cornhole.
What a twerp this clown is...
Zurawick is loathsome.
Bill O Reilly is as dishonest as they come.
We at freerepublic have seen him close up.
The Brian Williams episode is really stinging the left. A lefty associate of mine fired back a week ago with an attack on Fox and the “no go zones” in Paris.
The Williams scandal makes them look so stupid for believing him that even they can see how stupid they look, and that takes a lot for a bunch of dumb narcissists who are blinded by their mist of phony greatness.
I may start watching BOR again. Where’s the popcorn.
There are millions of democrat operatives who are willing to lie for the cause: destroy the enemy on the right.
MJ’s screed is not so much a defense of Brian Williams as it is an echo of Hillary’s “What difference does it make” regarding the credibility of the entire visual-media journalistas.
They all do it. Oh?Really? does it.
Nah, nah, nah. Boo-boo! Neener, neener.
What a bunch of children.
‘Arrested development’ is the most descriptive term regarding the progressive/liberal/dhimmicrats I can think of.
Excuse my falling preposition...
I often watch O'Reilly. Many times I disagree with him. Many times I agree with him.
To me, if O'Reilly's only reporting "sin" occurred way back in 1982 about a war far away Argentina between The British and Argentinians that most Americans cannot remember and had little interest in, then I say this: Compared to liar Brian Williams, O'Reilly is a trustworthy reporter .
The year 1986: If mother Jones wants to go way back to the 1980s to discuss a serious problem that is in the news today, how about going back to 1986. That is the year that Congress passed an immigration bill that supposedly would solve all our illegal immigration problems forever and ever.
We know how terrible that law turned out.
Has anyone noticed that David Corn doesn't look very human? The word "simian" comes to mind.
