The short answer is that congress and the president like “sanctuary cities”.
Por La Raza todo, Fuera de La Raza nada
Equal protection kind of puts the end to punitive actions from the fed. Though I don’t know if anybody actually test cased that back when Carter was so fond of holding highway funds hostage.
The issue isn’t sanctuary cities anymore.
Here in CA we have become a sanctuary state.
And since B.S. (Barry Soetoro) issued his executive order, we have become a sanctuary nation.
They are ringing the dinner bell for millions more illegal aliens to cross the border and replenish the Democrat Party voter base.
quickest way to “defund”
pro 2nd amendment states set up sanctuary cites using the same guidelines as immigration sanctuary cities..
but instead of immigration, apply it to those lawful gun owners, and legal guns not recognized or allowed in anti gun states..LOL
Mayors and other city officials who break the law, in this case by failing to enforce the law, should be prosecuted like any other lawbreaker.
If cities/states can be allowed to make their own immigration policy, some might choose the active enforcement option.
Aiding and Abetting: It is derived from the United States Code (U.S.C.), section two of title 18:
(a) Whoever commits an offense against the United States or aids, abets, counsels, commands, induces or procures its commission, is punishable as a principal.
(b) Whoever willfully causes an act to be done which if directly performed by him or another would be an offense against the United States, is punishable as a principal.