And it begins ... bring down FOX.
Don’t we have someone residing in the White House that is doing the same thing with American taxpayer money?
Meh...Something everybody has known since 2002.
That explains some of the move to the left at Fox since 2004
The real scandal is that the Saudi financing and involvement in 9/11 is well known and been covered up.
Scandal-Schmandal! Meanwhile nationally known as a high dollar tax cheat, Rev. Al Sharpton takes delivery of his 32nd three piece Rainbow Sharkskin suit. Al wants to get all dolled up for his News Show.
No wonder Fox news won’t expose Obama as a muslim.
America’s in great danger.
maybe we will see an improvement now in Fox News
at least less ‘fair and balance’ when it comes to reporting on the vast Saudi IslamoNAzi jihadi financing and training network
(including its prominent role in bringing a certain bHusseinO to America and paying for his expensive university tuition and part of his election campaign)
Shortly after the September 11, 2001 terror attacks, Alwaleed offered a $10 million contribution to a 9/11 fund for families and victims. Then-New York City Mayor Rudolph Giuliani rejected the money because Alwaleed had blamed the terror attacks on U.S. Middle East policy.
Bret Baier was searing, scorching tonight. Unchained.
How is this a scandal for Fox News?
This financier who’s accused of financing terror certainly hasn’t been influencing Fox reporting on Islamic Terror.
Is this writer scandalized by the amount of support Obama has provided terrorists around the world or the lack of reporting same by the rest of the MSM?
I believe this is the same investor who just reduced his holdings in the parent of Fox News from 6% to 1%. Readers of Free Republic have known this for years.
Sure he did. He could simply have refused to air them, which is the standard practice on other networks.
The allegations were made by Zacarias Moussaoui, the so-called 20th hijacker of 9/11, and provided in the form of a sworn statement to attorneys for families of 9/11 victims for their lawsuit against Saudi Arabia.
On which two things: 1) Not news. 2) Any statement "sworn to" by Zacarias Moussaoui isn't worth the paper it's printed on. In the instant case he's made this statement, which accidentally happens to be true. It costs him nothing because it was already well known. If he swore to the sky being blue, I'd stick my head out the window.
Kudos to James Rosen, and to Fox News for making a potentially embarrassing admission. I'll be ready to put Fox News into the same box as the alphabet "news organizations" when Bret Baier announces he's taking heavy fire in his studio, or when the Ben Rhodes-David Rhodes-Valerie Jarrett axis admits why Sharyl Attkisson's reporting was suppressed.
Who said waterboarding doesn't work? < /sarc >
No real progress is going to be made against ISIS terror unless we unfriend Saudi Arabia. That should’ve been the message from 911.
Much like the politicians of today, bought and sold for a price
Why no mention of him being the LARGEST shareholder in Citi group? Yes, Citi the bank with the biggest exposure to CDS and waaaay to big to fail?