Posted on 12/22/2014 6:18:34 AM PST by Libloather
**SNIP**
McKee said she’d like to see Cosby sit for a lie-detector test.
She also called it “embarrassing” that Cosby’s wife of 51 years, Camille, released a statement suggesting her husband was the “victim.”
“I knew (Camille). We’d been to dinner, all of us, many times,” McKee said. “This is not a stupid woman. She has her head buried in the sand."
(Excerpt) Read more at nydailynews.com ...
Don’t know how broke he is, but been dead for awhile.
Billy was a busy boy. F him.
I am not a psychologist but because of this type of alleged detail, I am tempted to guess that BC was sexually abused as a kid.
He’s 77 years old. He probably loves retirement.
Nonsense, on two major levels, Cosby was not dragging strangers out of the alleys, so raping when having them over for work, or readings, or social meetings was not unusual, for instance this very thread, they knew each other well, and the other is how you keep clinging to 20 and 40 years.
What about the 2004 rape that he settled out of court on in 2006, or the 2000 police report filed on a 1998 assault, or this latest case claiming rape in 2008?
Chamberlain?
What is your question about him?
Kathy McGee is mentioned on p. 293 of the biography of Sammy Davis Jr, “Gonna Do Great Things” (2003)
So these women are not random. The story notes that McGee missed the criminal statute of limitations for rape.
what about them??? The latest rape you say, 2008.....that's 7 years ago and she just now realizes that she was raped???
Cosby certainly isn't as pure as the driven snow but coincidently none of the women claimed rape at the time of the incident. While some may be legitimate claims of sexual encounters, what percentage were consentual??
Cosby is worth upwards of $400,000,000 and many might just be looking for a buck or two. They all know that the statute of limitations is long since past so what's the point other than seeking some sort of settlement.
Is that how you keep yourself ignorant, by continuing to ignore the facts?
Post 85 made corrections to your post that you must have already known, yet again, you just breeze past them.
Two filed police reports long before the statute of limitations, and how a third one has, Cosby settled with one of the others already.
**”While some may be legitimate claims of sexual encounters, what percentage were consentual??”**
That seems to think that at least one rape took place, would that be the one that Cosby doesn’t deny, and is it true that you think that some of these rapes and sexual assaults took place?
Her story is odd . . . he raped her, and *then* she went ahead and went to a party with him? WTF? That’s just bizarre. I wonder if she was drunk or something already when he raped her (assuming this is true, which may be a big assumption), and so was not thinking independently enough to get away from him afterward.
Just damn!!! Not even Sammy Davis Jr’s girlfriend was off limits to horndog Bill.
she was not Davis's girlfriend, she was his sexual partner when he was in her area...a roadie type...Probably didn't even know her last name.
Willing? How could they be willing if they were knocked out?
I’m sure Cosby could have found plenty of women that were willing, but it doesn’t sound like that’s what he was into. He wanted these women knocked out. For what reason, only he knows.
As far as these women wanting a ticket to a little $$? Please tell me why they would pick Cosby, who had a stellar reputation as a family man and a squeaky clean image? Why would they pick someone that is beloved by so many, making their accusations more difficult to be believed? Surely, they must have known that many people will simply believe him because he is Bill Cosby. Why didn’t they pick someone richer (a billionaire would have more money for them to get their hands onto) or someone with a questionable reputation?
I suppose you think the millions of Holocaust survivors were really piling on when they told their stories of what happened to them. They would be so much more believable if there were just one or two.
I suppose you think the same things about Jerry Sandusky’s accusers. The cases are very similar.
Some of those boys waited years to report what happened. There was literally no physical evidence (DNA, fingerprints, drug tests, video). One of the accusers even wrote glowing letters to Sandusky comparing him to family and even denied the abuse happened originally. Plus, with Penn State’s millions of dollars, you could say these boys were opportunists after $$. And you could say the boys lost their inhibitions being around Sandusky, who was a famous coach, and it couldn’t possibly be rape.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.