Zero fiddles while Rome burns.
He should take orders for Genesis cakes, inscribed with artwork and this quote
Genesis 1:27-28 So God created man in his own image, in the image of God he created him; male and female he created them. And God blessed them. And God said to them, “Be fruitful and multiply and fill the earth and subdue it and have dominion over the fish of the sea and over the birds of the heavens and over every living thing that moves on the earth.”
I don’t get why gays don’t patronize gay business, instead they trample around like bulls in a china shop.
It's call freedom.
Why jinx the celebration of their love by bringing in such a hatred for the event? I don't get it.
If this were my business it wouldn’t matter much what the court says. I would NOT bake them the cake. Period. End of discussion. Game over.
Seems like most of this would not be a problem if the federal government would stay out of it. Remembering when they didn’t intervene in this sort of thing,there didn’t seem to be a problem.
Civil Rights legislation, as well intentioned as it may have been, was unconstitutional and set the bad precedent on this sort of thing.
There is simply no Constitutional basis for forcing private citizens to provide services to others.
If Jim the barber only wants to serve red heads or wants to exclude red heads, that should be totally up to him and no one else. He should not be mandated by law to offer his services to everyone.
This is a precursor to “the mark”.
Those with faith in Christ will either have to compromise that faith or be forced out of business.
And the homo-agenda is simply a weapon of the left to accomplish that.
No bias in THIS article. And, I'd argue that this is exactly how it should be. I choose to patronize businesses that choose to serve me.
It ain't hard, but liberal crusaders sure try to make it that way.
Custom cakes are commissioned art pieces. Just as a painter or a sculptor is free to decline a commission, so is a cake artist (or a photographer). I think if the artists (whatever the medium) makes this policy known, their troubles with sex activists will go away.
Gays can easily find cake decorators who will do whatever theme they want, but that is not the goal. The gay thugs who file these lawsuits are bullies who get a kick out of forcing other people to pretend that homosexuals are not perverts. It’s a form of psychological rape, where the attack is all about power over another person, not about the cake.
I do not think kind thoughts about people so evil that they would try to force others to do as they demand, whether it is through physical rape or this sort of government-sponsored abuse of the innocent. In my view, these gay activists are lower than rapists. At least rapists put themselves on the line applying force personally instead of hiding behind a judge’s order enforced with government guns as the sissies behind this lawsuit do. I’m almost indifferent to homosexuals who keep their private lives private, but the predators in this lawsuit disgust me beyond words.
What would happen if a person were to visit a gay owned bakery and try to order a cake that said “Gays are miserable hateful sinners, pity them”? If they refused would they be liable under the same logic as this situation?
“Gay privilege”, it’s the Law.
Of course gay bakers can refuse service to Christians without being sued into oblivion