Democrats turn on Debbie Wasserman Schultz
I'm guessing ole Val is warming up the bus for Ms. Schultz's disastrous mid-terms losses:
Posted on 10/21/2014 4:58:45 AM PDT by Cruz_West_Paul2016
And put yourself in Chris Wallace's position in last Sundays episode of Fox News Sunday. Debbie Wasserman was adamant in regarding the Democrats retaining the senate. Well then, why didn't Chris ask her to name the "Deep Red States" Democrats will win that will keep them in power? or inform her that the Republicans are already going to win at least six seats. States that Romney won handily. Can you imagine if we take the Senate 54 to 46? Then the "Credible Debbie Wasserman" Will Have Some "Esplaining To Do" next time she visits Fox News Sunday.
Maybe Sissy was being a “journalist” by not challenging his guest?
God, anyone would of had a field day with her if they were in his place. This happens too often with Fox hosts. They let their liberal guest make an outlandish statement/accusation, yet don’t challenge them to the extent of making jackasses out of them.
I was amazed that Fox news made her “prediction” a huge headline story for two days as if it was an earth-shattering revelation.
Cause like most “journalists”,
Wallace is up the democrats ass.
Like father like son.
Because he knows that the Republicans are capable of snatching defeat from the jaws of victory.
Perhaps little Debbie knows something extra about the vote counting process.
Her new vixenish hairdo bewitched him and he couldn’t think straight.
If the GOP takes every race in which the Democrat has less than 50% support, that would be +15 seats in the Senate. It’s also unlikely, but we should make a serious challenge and boost last-minute spending in most of those races, if for no other reason than to divide Democrat spending and nationalize the election (and increase liberal panic).
The Dems should keep:
Hawaii (a lost cause),
Rhode Island (another lost cause),
Minnesota (a real shame with diaper-boy Franken continuing to soil FedGov),
New Mexico,
New Jersey (a tease that pretends to be close but has no chance of overcoming the massive liberal vote fraud), and
Massachusetts (again, a lost cause).
We could pick up:
West Virginia (open) - leading by 17%
Arkansas - leading by 5%
Louisiana - leading by 5%
Alaska leading by 4%
South Dakota (open) - 38% support, leading by 10% in a 3-way race, likely to change in the next two weeks.
Colorado - leading by 3%
Iowa (open) - leading by 2%
North Carolina - almost 50-50 chance, trailing by 1%, with Hagan trying hard and getting a lot of outside help.
New Hampshire - less than a 50-50 chance, trailing by 2%, with Shaheen at 45% getting a lot of outside help.
These would take almost a miracle:
Michigan - barely possible, trailing by 9%, but incumbent Peters is at 46% with weak support.
Virginia - unlikely, trailing by 11%, with incumbent Warner at 49%.
Illinois- unlikely, trailing by 12%, with incumbent Durbin at 49%.
Oregon - unlikely, trailing by 13%, with incumbent Merkley at 48% and weak support.
Democrats turn on Debbie Wasserman Schultz
I'm guessing ole Val is warming up the bus for Ms. Schultz's disastrous mid-terms losses:
Considering how this motor mouth woman won't shut up, why give her another opening to spew crap.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.