Should have said “Hey, let us show you this pigpen” ....
There is no “right to get married”
Faggot or otherwise.
host the sham affair and make it a day they will regret forever... tell them in advance you do not want their business and they will not be happy with your services and advise them to go where they will feel more wanted
then be rude to the attendees, if catering, make sure anything usually cold is warm and vise verse for things warm, spread manure the day before, etc,etc,etc...
there's no law against bad service specially since they were warned in advance
This sure as hell isn’t America anymore.
Not when things like this happen.
All my life I pledged allegiance to my country, and was willing to put my life on the line for its preservation. When I see situations like this going on, with homo-fascist thugs running both the government and the culture, I’m no longer bound by my former devotions. Not when America continues to embrace such evil and perversion.
The vicious left will destroy anything in their path. They are the social equivalent if terrorists.
The new world order has a new world religion for all. Like using Islam it’s a way of trying to break down christianity.
It’s more than obvious the Giffords were targeted by the “couple” in question. As per the article, the Giffords were perfectly willing to have the reception at their place. They just wouldn’t host the actual “wedding” — in fact, they host only about 12 wedding ceremonies a year. I pray that their financial livlihood isn’t too badly affected by their standing up for their rights!
when those liberals state that they should have homosexual marriage, then it is taking away religious freedom , the very core of why this country was founded.
Still trying to tell those liberals who state it’s not the Govt who should decide will never see that.
They'll spread the word that they will host the events for 'free'; and then take on the comers they want; who will then 'donate' to their cause of choice.
no more taxes, no more official business, just a couple of landowners offering their place up to those they can accommodate.
And I'm not trying to make the victims the criminals, but please consider the following. With all due respect to the Giffords and their parents, their parents evidently did not make sure that their children were taught about constitutionally enumerated rights versus 10th Amendment protected state powers so that their children could defend themselves in such a situation.
Ironically, and undoubtedly as a consequence of institutional indoctrination, pro-gay activist state policymakers are unthinkingly using the PC interpretation of 14A's Equal Protections Clause (EPC) to justify their hate crime against Christians imo. But the problem with hiding behind the EPC to push the gay agenda is the following.
Both John Bingham, the main author of Section 1 of the 14A, and also the Supreme Court, had clarified that 14A did not add any new personal protections to the Constitution. it just strengthens enumerated protections as evidenced by the following excerpts.
“Mr. Speaker, this House may safely follow the example of the makers of the Constitution and the builders of the Republic, by passing laws for enforcing all the privileges and immunities of the United States as guaranteed by the amended Constitution and expressly enumerated in the Constitution [emphasis added].” — Congressional Globe, House of Representatives, 42nd Congress, 1st Session. (See lower half of third column.)
“3. The right of suffrage was not necessarily one of the privileges or immunities of citizenship before the adoption of the Fourteenth Amendment, and that amendment does not add to these privileges and immunities. It simply furnishes additional guaranty for the protection of such as the citizen already had [emphasis added].” —Minor v. Happersett, 1874.
So since the states have never amended the Constitution to expressly protect gay rights, there are no enumerated protections to make 14A work in favor of the gay agenda.
Again, partisan state policymakers are likely unthinkingly expressing hatred for Christians, imo, by wrongly reading gay rights into the EPC.
Good job homos. Your work is done here. Biotches.
The First Amendment should not die.
Can’t some legal entity help these folks fight?
Just what the perverts want.Cultural and economic terrorism under the color of law.
Welcome to the 1964 Civil Rights act in action.
Hope you’re happy, you dyke b****es. Gays are always complaining they’re discriminated against, then they do everything in their power to make normal people HATE them.
Homosexual vindictiveness and hatred on display.
If it were me I would have allowed the gay weddings except that on wedding day I will be far away while my assistant is in charge. I am not going watch this perversion and mockery of marriage.
#2 I will hire five guys with rifles to guard the sheep and other livestock
Eventually even churches will be given similar orders by judges.