For anyone not familiar with this “study”, be aware it’s performed by a male homosexual.
what a shock .
After raising three boys to adulthood, I would LOVE to adopt a little girl. :)
but, does that make me gay, or a homophobe or a racist or something?
I’m so utterly confused these days...
The most scientifically credible studies show that children of heterosexual parents fare better on numerous indicators of personal well-being than children of homosexual parents. Authored by Mark Regnerus, a sociology professor at the University of Texas at Austin, the study was published in the July 2012 issue of Social Science Research.
Regnerus’ findings conflict with studies widely touted by homosexual activists which have claimed that children raised by homosexual parents fare as well or even better than their peers. Many of these studies, Regnerus points out, have relied on small, self-selected samples, parent rather than child reported outcomes, and have exhibited evidence of political bias.
Regnerus drew his data from the New Family Structures Study, a data collection project that drew from a large, random sample of American young adults. This study is one of the few that measures outcomes as reported by the children of homosexuals, rather than relying on an assessment by the homosexual parent.
A large-scale study by Douglas W. Allen, professor of economics at Simon Fraser University, has found that children in same-sex households were only 65 percent as likely to graduate from high school as those living in traditional opposite sex marriage families.
And pray tell, what would the consequences be if the study was found to a complete and total fabrication? Kind of like Michael Mann’s study.
Most likely, the UN would step in, undertake a multi-billion dollar worldwide movement to bolster the false results, allow 2-3 genocides to occur resulting in the deaths of perhaps 5 million people, while arguing they were working for the children. There would be demands for new taxes, restrictions upon heterosexual films, books, websites, new tariffs on all those “oooh, baby” tunes from the fifties, unless they were hippy love tunes from the 60’s, but tariffs would kick in again for 70’s, 80’s, 90’s love songs that apparently implied heterosexualism, and then general relaxation of tariffs on tunes from about 2008 on because Dear Leader was elected then so long as the vocals were waif-like pubescent gals or out-of-tune Cocoa-boy meterosexual types chanting about how worried they are about stuff and things, or, they could be violent Gangsta rap or Nikki Minaj sex tunes coz da YouEnn be down wit dat.
1.4 Personal Relationships
Sexual orientation, preference, gender, or gender identity should have no impact on the government's treatment of individuals, such as in current marriage, child custody, adoption, immigration or military service laws. Government does not have the authority to define, license or restrict personal relationships.
Enza, I didn’t know you wrote for the American Thinker!
Homosexuals won’t even admit that the “gay lifestyle” reduces the lifespan of men by 8-20 years. Now they cherry pick gay couples with children to “prove” that children of gay parents are better off than children of hetero parents.
The Father of Lies has helpers who operate along similar lines.
Not all homosexuals are pedophiles, but a shocking percentage of pedophiles are homosexual.
They’re trying hard to normalize their chosen lifestyle.
Can someone explain the last paragraph to me?
I’m amazed they’re only 16 responses to this so far.