Posted on 08/23/2014 9:41:21 AM PDT by seeker41
General McInerney was just on FoxNews and gave an ominous warning when pressed today. He stated that he had info that we are about to have another 9/11. He stated that next week something was coming (info, publication) that was going to blow things out of the water. He mentioned we should be on DEFCON1 now and then mentioned the MH370 incident. He was adamant and seemed worried! Sorry I could not make out everything he said.
“Does anyone have proof the missing plane did not land in Muzzieland and was re-painted? Does anyone has even a shred of evidence it crashed into the ocean?”
There is no proof of anything about that plane-——not one thing. That’s the point.
.
Lake Superior.
Barrys so excited about the PROGRESS being made by his mooselim buddies...that he cant sit still
he got ants in his pants
and he have to dance
That could work.
“Has it been determined yet where that airplane vanished?”
It vanished somewhere in the Southern Hemisphere of the planet Earth.
so sorry. could not resist. :)
When there is ZERO proof the plane crashed, smart people should assume the plane landed, piloted by a fanatic muzzie.
There is satellite data that proves the plane must have been within a certain broad circular arc on the earth's surface. ISIS territory does not overlap even the northern part of the arc, much less the far southern areas believed (based on secondary evidence) to be MH370's most likely final resting place.
Very interesting comments on this thread. Thank you.
Zullo’s plan B, after all other legal/congress plays hit a dead end?
The military is a bureaucracy. He is advocating for more budget.
There is absolutely nothing we can do to prevent an Islamic attack on the US today - Islamic terrorists are already here. We let them in, and we let them be radicalized right here.
The good general is just using this inevitable series of events (part of which he influenced - by not speaking out sooner) to advocate for more defense budget.
The next islamic attack on the US will be distributed, it will be focused on critical infrastructure and killing people where Americans congregate - including our children at their schools.
Our own government prevents us from taking effective steps to prevent such an event.
The response to a distributed threat must be equally distributed. The military will only waste the money.
How much does that estimated range expand if the plane made a stealth refueling at Diego Garcia? (Rhetorical/hypothetical question)
<< “The next islamic attack on the US will be distributed, it will be focused on critical infrastructure and killing people where Americans congregate - including our children at their schools.”>>
I’ve always wondered why terrorists are so emo, always going for a high body count. If they simultaneously took out the key bridges on our interstate highways and cyber-sabatoged our electric grid, think what a long-term crippling effect it would have on the economy and our ability to respond. (transporting of food, military equipment & supplies, workers who keep the economy going, etc.). Even if the electric grid was repaired rather quickly, bridge repairs would take years.
Thank you for this excellent, informative post and for the timely advice!
“bridge repairs would take years.”
Not if you actually want it done quickly. You’d be surprised how fast things can get done if you subtract government and unions from the task.
Thanks
I suppose the northern arc might have been extended far enough to allow landing at an ISIS-held airfield. But that would contradict Doppler analysis, which indicates the plane actually headed south. Also, if the plane had headed north, it's extremely unlikely that it would have escaped being tracked by at least one of the radars of the various countries there. And, if it had landed in ISIS territory, it's highly likely US intelligence would have seen it, along with the trenches dug to hold the pax.
But any theory involving a stop at Diego Garcia is strictly tin-foil hat stuff, as it would require the active cooperation of the US military. Too many people would know about it, some of whom would be loyal to the United States and not to the Obama Regime.
The best theory I can come up with is that the captain hijacked the plane, locking the copilot out of the cockpit. Then the remaining crew and passengers attempted to break into the cockpit, whereupon the captain attempted to subdue them by decompressing the cabin. Only something went wrong, and he knocked himself out as well. The plane was headed south at the time and flew on autopilot until it ran out of fuel.
Lot's of unanswered questions, the primary one being, What was the captain's plan? Also, there is the possibility a third party did it, and the flight crew are both innocent.
One interesting detail: Apparently, the copilot's cell phone was turned off on departure from Kuala Lumpur, as is normal practice. However, it later checked in with at least one cell tower at some point after the plane deviated from its planned route. That would be consistent with the copilot turning his phone back on in order to issue a mayday, failing to get service, then, in the heat of the struggle, not noticing when his phone actually did get service. Too bad he didn't have a text message to his pilot gf queued.
If that satellite info is so reliable, why it can not pin point where the plane crashed? Why no debris was ever found?
The plane could have landed in any part of muzzieland under control of jihadists. That includes ISIS (Iraq & Syria), Yemen, Afghanistan, Waziristan province in Pakistan, etc.
The satellite was designed to relay messages from airplanes, not to track them. However, Inmarsat engineers were able to deduce the arcs from the time delays observed in the satellite's hourly pings of the airplane's satellite transponder. (The bad guys had turned off the systems that use the transponder, but they forgot to turn off the transponder itself.)
The ping delays determine the plane's the distance from the satellite, which hangs several earth diameters above the Indian Ocean. The arcs are the intersection of a distance-determined imaginary sphere with the earth's surface, further narrowed by how far the plane could have gone, given time and fuel. The north vs south is a somewhat iffier analysis, based on small frequency shifts in the ping replies, which indicate the plane's speed towards or away from the satellite. But the arcs are pretty iron-clad.
Engineering, not whack-jobbery, IOW.
I think you got it. Cheers back at you.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.