Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

How to not handle a young-earth creationist employee: Fired in wake of finding dino soft tissue
Observation Deck ^ | 07/30/2014

Posted on 07/31/2014 2:58:12 PM PDT by SeekAndFind

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last

1 posted on 07/31/2014 2:58:12 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

The Planet Earth knows nothing of Creation


2 posted on 07/31/2014 3:00:14 PM PDT by molson209 (Blank)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Sounds like he were doing his job and the students a service.

Look - I (personally) think young Earth creationism is total BS. But - by bringing up an alternate point of view he were doing something that far more teachers should: teaching the students to examine the evidence and THINK. Not just vomit up whatever textbook the professor happened to write last summer.


3 posted on 07/31/2014 3:09:37 PM PDT by EC1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
That day, Mr. Armitage also appeared at the Rocky Mountain Creation Fellowship's monthly meeting identifying as a Biologist at CSU-Northridge, speaking about how scientific timescales must be wrong.

There's his problem right there. He was a lab tech. Going off and speaking at a conference (any conference, but a YEC conference is going to draw more attention) and holding himself out as a "Biologist at CSU-Northridge" was not a smart career move, to put it mildly.

4 posted on 07/31/2014 3:27:59 PM PDT by Conscience of a Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: molson209

You’ll have to explain what that sentence means.


5 posted on 07/31/2014 4:11:19 PM PDT by Theo (May Christ be exalted above all.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: EC1

Hate to be the grammar nazi but what in Hades is going on with this “he were” business. The past tense of “he is” is “he was”, not “he were”.


6 posted on 07/31/2014 4:28:05 PM PDT by Yardstick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Yardstick

Habit, sorry. I often dictate to the computer rather than typing, since I talk fast and type slow. Using were instead of was is part of the local dialect I grew up with, and I forget to correct it a lot of the time. Can’t catch it with spell check because it’s a valid word.

One of those annoying brain farts we all get from time to time.


7 posted on 07/31/2014 4:32:36 PM PDT by EC1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: molson209

That’s because it’s a chunk of lifeless dirt.


8 posted on 07/31/2014 4:43:40 PM PDT by reasonisfaith ("...because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved." (2 Thessalonians))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: EC1

Roger that. I wondered if spell check might not be involved somehow...

Out of curiosity, what part of the country are you from that used “were” in funny places as part of the dialect?


9 posted on 07/31/2014 4:55:23 PM PDT by Yardstick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: EC1
Are you one of those slow manual typewriter creationists?
We're watching you closely!


10 posted on 07/31/2014 5:04:35 PM PDT by MaxMax (Pay Attention and you'll be pissed off too! FIRE BOEHNER, NOW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Yardstick

I’m English - North Yorkshire WAS where I was raised (nearly slipped!). There are all sorts of odd (or very odd) ways of saying things there, really old and harking back to Old Saxon and Viking, and your mind just accepts them. The stuff you learn as a kid never really goes away.

Have you ate, instead of have you eaten, for example.

I’m pretty scrupulous about using spell check, but if that red line isn’t there, just don’t notice sometimes.


11 posted on 07/31/2014 5:04:37 PM PDT by EC1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: MaxMax

I couldn’t create a typewriter if you gave me a million :)


12 posted on 07/31/2014 5:07:21 PM PDT by EC1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: EC1

Oh, okay, English. Now it’s all making sense. You guys do have see some funky archaic-isms. Sometimes English dialect quirks aren’t so much wrong as just a few centuries out of date.


13 posted on 07/31/2014 5:13:12 PM PDT by Yardstick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Yardstick

Oddly - according to many linguists, which is a really odd job to have, you Americans have a purer form of the original language, say from Shakespeare’s time. Your pronunciation, at least. Except for aluminium - that’s just barbaric the way you butcher an innocent word :)


14 posted on 07/31/2014 5:21:39 PM PDT by EC1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Well...if they had an astronomer who believed the sun revolved around the earth then I'd expect they'd be let go too.

If people want to say he was fired for his religious beliefs then fine. I'd say that if he was spreading young earth creationism in an academic setting then I'd say he was fired because he didn't know his field.

15 posted on 07/31/2014 5:25:10 PM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
I completely reject young earth creationism. It simply isn't consistent with other things that we know from many different fields of science.

Having said that, I'm puzzled by these goings-on. Did he in fact find soft tissue in bones that should have been completely fossilized? That is, tissue that hadn't become fossilized? That's a crucial issue, but it seems to have become lost in the debate over his alleged religious beliefs. If true, it's an important scientific finding, with lots of implications for what we think we know about biology, chemistry, and a lot of other things.

Finally, I'm disturbed that researchers were digging up bones only to break them. Surely there are better ways of getting samples from their interiors than destroying the bones. Doesn't sound like good science to me.

16 posted on 07/31/2014 5:25:36 PM PDT by JoeFromSidney (Book: Resistance to Tyranny. Buy from Amazon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoodleDawg

RE: . I’d say that if he was spreading young earth creationism in an academic setting then I’d say he was fired because he didn’t know his field.

From the article:

” During the interview process he informed the interview panel (two professors and Mr. Krohmer) that he had published positively about young-earth creationism.”

Why did they hire him knowing this?


17 posted on 07/31/2014 5:59:28 PM PDT by SeekAndFind (If at first you don't succeed, put it out for beta test.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: JoeFromSidney

RE: Did he in fact find soft tissue in bones that should have been completely fossilized? That is, tissue that hadn’t become fossilized?

From CBS News Local:

http://losangeles.cbslocal.com/2014/07/24/scientist-alleges-csun-fired-him-for-discovery-of-soft-tissue-on-dinosaur-fossil/

EXCERPT:

While at the Hell Creek Formation excavation site in Montana, researcher Mark Armitage discovered what he believed to be the largest triceratops horn ever unearthed at the site, according to attorney Brad Dacus of Pacific Justice Institute.

Upon examination of the horn under a high-powered microscope back at CSUN, Dacus says Armitage was “fascinated” to find soft tissue on the sample – a discovery Bacus said stunned members of the school’s biology department and even some students“because it indicates that dinosaurs roamed the earth only thousands of years in the past rather than going extinct 60 million years ago.”


18 posted on 07/31/2014 6:01:57 PM PDT by SeekAndFind (If at first you don't succeed, put it out for beta test.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: JoeFromSidney

You can find an abstract of the paper Mark Hollis Armitage wrote here:

http://www.researchgate.net/publication/235646829_Soft_sheets_of_fibrillar_bone_from_a_fossil_of_the_supraorbital_horn_of_the_dinosaur_Triceratops_horridus

TITLE:

Soft sheets of fibrillar bone from a fossil of the supraorbital horn of the dinosaur Triceratops horridus.

Department of Biology, California State University, 18111 Nordhoff Street, Northridge, CA 91330-8303, USA. Electronic address: . Acta histochemica (Impact Factor: 1.61). 02/2013; DOI: 10.1016/j.acthis.2013.01.001


19 posted on 07/31/2014 6:04:51 PM PDT by SeekAndFind (If at first you don't succeed, put it out for beta test.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: EC1

Just for your information,

Here’s an episode of Ian Juby’s show that contains an interview with Mark Armitage:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=abhgreIBKZ0&index=19&list=UU23yiJV4Bkagj5dkH-UyHFA


20 posted on 07/31/2014 6:07:23 PM PDT by SeekAndFind (If at first you don't succeed, put it out for beta test.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson