Posted on 07/23/2014 11:37:23 AM PDT by Citizen Zed
Mike Cutler, a 63-year-old grandfather, allegedly killed his cancer cells with homemade cannabis oil, after receiving his second liver cancer diagnosis in five years.
The cancer survivor was first diagnosed with liver cancer in 2009 after he blacked out at work, after which he then received an organ transplant in November of that year. However, last year, his health took a turn for the worst when he found out new cancerous cells were attacking his new organ.
A liver transplant and a second cancer diagnosis later, Cutler decided to buy marijuana from a dealer and make his tablets from the oil to treat his condition. The grandfather admits that after three days of taking one capsule, his severe pain disappeared and eventually began to cough up blood, which he believes contained the dead cancer cells. I cant believe cannabis oil isnt being used regularly as treatment. It is a miracle cure."
(Excerpt) Read more at m.medicaldaily.com ...
I don’t know. I don’t understand the attitude. There is sufficient data to support the claims that cannabis oil works as a cancer treatment.
Couldn’t resist posting. I’m thinking of flagging my own post as objectionable abuse now.
I have no problems with scientists researching the efficacy of Marijuana and it's derivative chemicals for various illnesses, but I am not interested in reading crap from people who start their research with that as their central premise.
Which appears to be most, if not all of them.
Ironically the salicylic acid in willow bark is already buffered by other phytochemicals in the willow bark.
From what i've seen, most of that "research" comes from people with agendas. They start out trying to prove the stuff is beneficial, and by golly all of their tests and experiments reveal that they were right!
Not buying it. It's like the Palestinians reporting on Israel. You already know what they are going to say, and it isn't likely to be the truth.
Yes, the British Journal of Cancer, the NIH, the biology dept. of Complutense University, the British Journal of Pharmacology and Cancer Research UK all have agendas. lol
What have you seen that leads you to this conclusion?
Pic saved to faves. You are GOOD!
“From what i’ve seen, most of that “research” comes from people with agendas. They start out trying to prove the stuff is beneficial
“What have you seen that leads you to this conclusion?
Hmmmmm... What is the big drug makers, Alex?
It isn’t just for killing brain cells anymore.
Some wonder kid out of high school has received a huge grant to work with the cannabis oil as a cancer cure. Supposedly it does work.
You don’t have to buy it. It either works or it doesn’t. The cancer is gone or it isn’t. The alleged agenda is largely irrelevant.
And this is what I mean about pot causing brain damage, the researchers aren't "the British Journal of Cancer", the researchers are N Olea-Herrero, D Vara, S Malagarie-Cazenave, and I Díaz-Laviada.
Lot of Spanish sounding names for a British Journal, don't you think? Where do these people work, and what do they do? Well they would appear to constantly write papers about Marijuana being good for you. They appear to be out of Spain. You know, where smoking that crap is legal, and a lot of people make money off of selling it. Not without problems, of course.
So Cancer cells stop growing when you hit them with pot? I'm suspecting brain cells stop growing too, when you hit them with pot.
But YAH! That drug we like to smoke kills cancer! Far out man! We should totes legalize that sh*t or somethin.
Nice display of some real brain damage there, skippy.
And that's based on research from DiogenesLamp's Suspicions. Never heard of that outfit.
But YAH! That drug we like to smoke kills cancer! Far out man! We should totes legalize that sh*t or somethin.
Straw men arguments are so Alinsky.
Six years of people posting similar articles. At first I thought of them as credible, but the more digging I did, the more it became apparent that this stuff comes from an echo chamber of interconnected people who are looking for beneficial results of pot because they want to use them to justify legalizing pot.
They aren't "researchers" per se, they are specifically POT researchers, which are just like "Gay" researchers or "Global Warming" researchers in their methods and results.
How about "POT researchers try to prove POT is Beneficial."
That is probably closer to the truth.
While we're at it.
"Gay researchers try to prove that "Gay" is Normal!"
"Global Warming Researchers try to Prove Global Warming is true!"
How about, it doesn’t take much to make a drug warrior go bananas! ROTFLOL
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.