Go Reuters.
To: Citizen Zed
"Dude, I wasn't aware till I read it in the news."
To: Citizen Zed
0bama’s presidency is too inert to be described as malaise.
3 posted on
06/24/2014 11:09:32 AM PDT by
TigersEye
("No man left behind" means something different to 0bama.)
That’s fine as long as it doesn’t affect his golf game.
4 posted on
06/24/2014 11:12:13 AM PDT by
Rio
(Proud resident of the State of Jefferson)
To: Citizen Zed
Malaise was the term used in 1979 to describe the deep pessimism Americans felt about the way things were going in the country. And the country, on the whole, was in far better condition.
5 posted on
06/24/2014 11:13:30 AM PDT by
ScottinVA
(If it doesn't include border security, it isn't "reform." It's called "amnesty.")
To: Citizen Zed
Stagflation too, although government statistics are being jiggered to cover it up.
6 posted on
06/24/2014 11:14:11 AM PDT by
Steely Tom
(How do you feel about robbing Peter's robot?)
To: Citizen Zed
Malaise Moochell, what is the difference?
7 posted on
06/24/2014 11:15:43 AM PDT by
mountainlion
(Live well for those that did not make it back.)
To: Citizen Zed
I disagree with the assessment that if Obama were eligible to run a third time he would lose. The sheeple would dutifully re-elect him.
9 posted on
06/24/2014 11:19:30 AM PDT by
YourAdHere
(I flip off all Obama bumper stickers.)
To: Citizen Zed
Carter was a impotent flake.
But he wasn't a criminal.
11 posted on
06/24/2014 11:22:29 AM PDT by
skeeter
To: Citizen Zed
This in Reuters? Well it’s a start I guess.
... but there’s still plenty of Obama-ass-kissing from CNN, The New York Times, Washington Post, etc. to more than offset.
When they start criticising, THAT will be news
To: Citizen Zed
Malaise would be an improvement.
15 posted on
06/24/2014 11:30:14 AM PDT by
DManA
To: Citizen Zed
Ain't no "malaise" about it.
Every malevolent action is deliberate.
16 posted on
06/24/2014 11:32:13 AM PDT by
E. Pluribus Unum
("The more numerous the laws, the more corrupt the government." --Tacitus)
To: Citizen Zed
Obama is threatening to make Carter look good in comparison. Even Carter had realized bad economic policy like price controls on petroleum was a bad idea and got laws signed in 1980 that began the phaseout process on petroleum price controls. And once price controls ended, within five years OPEC was under serious threat because the price nosedived from $34/barrel to $12/barrel!
18 posted on
06/24/2014 11:48:14 AM PDT by
RayChuang88
(FairTax: America's economic cure)
To: Citizen Zed
CARTER WAS just a STUPID LIBTARD
OBAMA IS A TRAITOR
19 posted on
06/24/2014 11:52:25 AM PDT by
zzwhale
To: Citizen Zed
That moment began in January of 2009. Period. Full stop. End of story.
To: Citizen Zed
...the president seems hapless and ineffectual.Seems?????
To: Citizen Zed
Bill Schneider backed the Clintons all thru the 90's.
Nothing's changed. Here he is doing it again.
To: Citizen Zed
I like that Reuters gets this is a malaise moment, but in the end they cheer for HITLERY as the solution So, it is a wasted column.
To: Citizen Zed
Carter was not as bad as Obama, not even close. The Iran hostage situation was bad, of course, but Carter didn't do anything that got them killed. The world had not descended into chaos under his presidency. The fuel embargo and inflation changed the US, but it when it was over we still had a middle class.
The US will never recover from Obama.
26 posted on
06/24/2014 1:31:27 PM PDT by
grania
To: Citizen Zed
Gee. Put a hapless community agitator in the White House. What possibly could go wrong?
He is the least qualified President in our history and we are suffering accordingly.
27 posted on
06/24/2014 3:18:19 PM PDT by
Gabrial
(The nightmare will continue as long as the nightmare is in the Whitehouse.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson