Posted on 06/21/2014 10:00:35 AM PDT by Perdogg
Peter Jackson's Middle Earth franchises 'The Hobbit' and 'Lord of the Rings' had for a long time been the cream of the crop for fantasy entertainment, but now there's a new contender for the throne in HBO's 'Game of Thrones'
'Lord of the Rings' is regarded by many as one of the best film trilogies of all time, fantasy genre or otherwise, it's third film smashed Academy award records and to this date holds the record for highest number of Oscar wins, winning in every category it was nominated.
'Game of Thrones' doesn't quite have the same awards success, although it is the most pirated show on television and recently more people have watched 'Game of Thrones' than 'The Sopranos' making it HBO's most popular show of all time.
(Excerpt) Read more at uk.movies.yahoo.com ...
LotR has the ring of authenticity about that GoT will never have. Tolkien modeled his world on medieval society as it actually existed, while Martin’s is just a shallow facsimile populated by soap opera characters. It shows in the silly names he chose for his cities: King’s Landing? Winterfell? Why not just name them “Capital City” and “Northern City” and be done with it.
There’s nothing particularly grown up about wanting to watch fake sex. That’s more adolescent.
That’s a good question. My impression is that Tolkien was just as interested in compiling dictionaries and genealogies and composing poems as he was in a narrative structure ... maybe even more.
LOL!
I always thought that R.R. in his name had to be a direct homage to Tolkien.
GoT is inarguably more realistic in its portrayal of human character than LOTR, but I got tired of the unrelieved anti-heroism.
LOTR is epic or as a poster said, biblical. Somehow, though, that heroic saga quality doesn't convey a more rounded view of life, which GOT in a way does. LOTR seems a bit more one-note. I got a bit tired of the epic-heroic quality, while the hobbit world that might have added variety really didn't work for me -- a little too much English sentimentalism.
Arguably, though that very concentrated or unified Wagnerian character of the stories may mean that LOTR will last longer than GOT, in the same way that generations did feel the need to pass down and record their epics and sagas while they let stories and anecdotes that conveyed other sides of life pass away into oblivion.
I only know the video, though, not the actual books.
Game of thrones is porn. Take out the porn and few would be watching.
GOT is vaguely with the realm of possibility without having the baggage of different mythological creatures as heroes.
Martin was a BIG fan of Jack Vance (probably one of the best of the genre). Jack Vance used food a lot because people are always hungry. Vance could write superb Fantasy and SF.
I have nothing to compare LOTR to ... I have never read or watched, and have no inclination to either read or watch, any portion of GOT.
Agree on all points. I would add only that we can't answer the thread title's question until/unless A Song of Ice and Fire is completed.
"Fellowship" started something wonderful and it was my favorite of the three. I didn't mind the necessary changes to keep the story moving and to add dramatic tension at the end. Ended on a positive, hopeful note.
Game of Thrones, the show, got me to read "A Game of Thrones", the book, which had been on my shelf for a few years, having had won it in a book raffle. Had I read it when it originally came out, I might not have picked up the second book. Lots of good stuff in the book, but there didn't seem to be an ending. Yes, it's a series, but the book still needs an ending, and this one seemed no closer to tying up the storylines. Everything across the Narrow Sea seemed for naught or rather nothing mattered except the last page or so. Yes, events had to happen, and the twists were questionable, but did we need to slog through it all?
I enjoyed Peter Dinklage and have "hated" Charles Dance since I watched "Bleak House". As for the rest... not much to say without spoiling things for curious people reading this thread.
And my reaction was "Winter is coming??? STILL??? That was the first frickin' line of the first frickin' book and it still isn't here yet?????"
Ahem. I, er, stopped reading reviews at that book.
Same with Spartacus as porn.
Lord of the Rings
Game of Thrones
BAH!
Harry Potter for the win!
I have to say absolutely that LOTR is better. I only watched 5 minutes of GoT and had to turn it off when they cut to a scene of two queers just finishing up, still hot and sweaty. Yuck. I do not want to see that stuff.
Have you seen a picture of Martin?
True, but even Tolkien said in the intro that people should not make historical interpretations.
I think LOTR is far superior
I consider Game of Thrones to be porn with a plot
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.