1 posted on
06/11/2014 7:48:43 PM PDT by
kingattax
To: kingattax
Remington had basically the same thing 150 years ago except it wasn’t powerful.
2 posted on
06/11/2014 7:51:04 PM PDT by
yarddog
(Romans 8: verses 38 and 39. "For I am persuaded".)
To: kingattax
To: kingattax
Crikey, that thing would be a handful in .45 ACP. I want one.
To: kingattax
For the same price you could have a real gun.
5 posted on
06/11/2014 7:53:43 PM PDT by
E. Pluribus Unum
("The more numerous the laws, the more corrupt the government." --Tacitus)
To: kingattax
I could see it maybe in .380. Anything more powerful would hurt.
7 posted on
06/11/2014 7:56:20 PM PDT by
yarddog
(Romans 8: verses 38 and 39. "For I am persuaded".)
To: kingattax
You can get a lot of 9mm pocket guns not much bigger, but this thing does look cool and may be more ergonomic than many typical derringers.
8 posted on
06/11/2014 8:00:57 PM PDT by
umgud
To: kingattax
Rather have this:
11 posted on
06/11/2014 8:04:47 PM PDT by
SkyDancer
(If you don't read the newspapers you are uninformed. If you do read newspapers you are misinformed)
To: kingattax; mylife; carriage_hill; smokingfrog
Very interesting.
The “GunTalk” ping list may be interested.
13 posted on
06/11/2014 8:06:53 PM PDT by
Clint N. Suhks
( Laughter is the best medicine, unless you have diarrhea.)
To: kingattax; mylife; carriage_hill; smokingfrog
“15-ounce weight”
Nevermind.
15 posted on
06/11/2014 8:09:09 PM PDT by
Clint N. Suhks
( Laughter is the best medicine, unless you have diarrhea.)
To: kingattax
Out of their minds for that price.
9mm or .380 pocket semi autos make more sense and you
can deliver a lot more than 2 shots for close to the same price.
19 posted on
06/11/2014 8:18:44 PM PDT by
The Cajun
(tea party!!!, Sarah Palin, Mark Levin, Ted Cruz, Mike Lee, Louie Gohmert......Nuff said.)
To: kingattax
If you have to have something smaller than, say a Walther PPK, then it might make sense. It doesn’t look like it should be that expensive to make so maybe a similar design could be made which functions well for only a $180 or so.
My Caliber of choice? .32 H&R magnum. Then you can use several different cartridges in it according to how much recoil you could stand.
38 posted on
06/11/2014 8:47:49 PM PDT by
yarddog
(Romans 8: verses 38 and 39. "For I am persuaded".)
To: kingattax
New version will be out in .410 whereas current models are in 9 mm and .45. Because of the slim profile, I have some interest in this gun. Just got a Glock 42 and had some issues in 2% of the firings while breaking it in. Simplicity of this gun also appeals as there is little to go wrong. Hope to have an opportunity to try one in a few weeks.
To: kingattax
Novelty gun. About as big as a .38 snubbie or a .380 or 9mm pocket pistol so why bother?
44 posted on
06/11/2014 9:03:15 PM PDT by
Eagles6
(Valley Forge Redux. If not now, when? If not here, where? ?)
To: kingattax
47 posted on
06/12/2014 3:21:09 AM PDT by
Tainan
(Cogito, ergo conservatus sum -- "The Taliban is inside the building")
To: kingattax
Oh Boy! 27 lbs. of trigger pull. That will drive tacks all day long.(sarc)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson