Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

How Google Got States To Legalize Driverless Cars
Associated Press ^ | 5/30/14 | Justin Pritchard

Posted on 05/30/2014 11:13:25 PM PDT by Lmo56

MOUNTAIN VIEW, Calif. (AP) -- About four years ago, the Google team trying to develop cars driven by computers - not people - concluded that sooner than later, the technology would be ready for the masses. There was one big problem: No state had even considered whether driverless cars should be legal.

And yet this week, Google said it wants to give Californians access to a small fleet of prototypes it will make without a steering wheel or pedals.

The plan is possible because, by this time next year, driverless cars will be legal in the tech giant's home state.

(Excerpt) Read more at hosted.ap.org ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy
KEYWORDS: automatedcars; car; cronycapitalism; cronycorporatism; donoevil; doublestandard; driverless; driverlesscars; experimentation; fascism; google; highways; lobbyists; noaccountability; payforplay; payola; publicroads; safetyfirst; scienceexperiment
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-86 next last
To: null and void

And I started a job a few weeks ago so I can’t be as wonderful as often. Should work out just fine


61 posted on 05/31/2014 8:50:54 AM PDT by Nifster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: null and void

Good point, nully. Best of luck with your new job!


62 posted on 05/31/2014 8:59:55 AM PDT by azishot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Nifster

Great! Congratulations!


63 posted on 05/31/2014 9:02:13 AM PDT by null and void (Disarm Hollywood! No Guns for Box Office!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: azishot

Thanks!


64 posted on 05/31/2014 9:02:28 AM PDT by null and void (Disarm Hollywood! No Guns for Box Office!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Lmo56

Yeah right now with the old fashioned bio computers operating them we hose 50000 people a year. Idiots driving drunk, texting, yaking just plain day dreaming and just good old fashioned STUPID. I don’t think Google can actually make it any worse....


65 posted on 05/31/2014 9:09:34 AM PDT by Kozak ("It may be dangerous to be America's enemy, but to be America's friend is fatal" Henry Kissinger)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: null and void

Looked up jimsonweed recently. Even on the hardcore drug user threads, every single person that it’s a really bad idea to even try the stuff. Guaranteed bad trip, apparently. No recreational benefit.


66 posted on 05/31/2014 9:13:14 AM PDT by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Sherman Logan
No accounting for taste, I once knew a young lady who claimed to have taken LSD (some large number I can't quite recall, certainly over 50, maybe hundreds) of times and had a bad trip every single time!

Why? she couldn't help herself, any more than most people can drive by a bad accident without looking...

67 posted on 05/31/2014 9:28:24 AM PDT by null and void (Disarm Hollywood! No Guns for Box Office!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Kozak
I don’t think Google can actually make it any worse....

NEVER underestimate google.

68 posted on 05/31/2014 9:29:24 AM PDT by null and void (Disarm Hollywood! No Guns for Box Office!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: null and void

Mad as a hatter. I missed “mad as a hatter” in the mnemonic...


69 posted on 05/31/2014 9:53:15 AM PDT by null and void (Disarm Hollywood! No Guns for Box Office!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: null and void

I’m so proud of you!


70 posted on 05/31/2014 9:58:57 AM PDT by Shimmer1 (The love that dare not speak its name is now the love that will not shut its *bleeping* mouth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: jsanders2001

A human CAN make a better decision, but they often don’t. How many times do you see people turn into a street without enough opening? Go too fast for conditions? Tailgate? Blow through signs and lights? Not to mention all the non-driving things they do to make themselves bad drivers: drinking, texting, cellphoning. A big part of the problem is that we take driving for granted, when we’re fully engaged and analyzing the situation and using our skills we’re very good drivers. But 99% of the time behind the wheel we aren’t those things, we’re going through the rote motions, thinking about work, or dinner, or the spouse, or just zoning out. How often do you get home from work and realize you don’t remember ANYTHING about the drive home? How engaged do you think you were during that time? Could you have avoided a bad situation? Are you sure you didn’t make a bad situation?

Computers don’t have any of those problems.


71 posted on 05/31/2014 11:44:22 AM PDT by discostu (Seriously, do we no longer do "phrasing"?!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: discostu

Well I’ll let you be the human crash dummy first. Fair enough?...: )


72 posted on 05/31/2014 11:59:58 AM PDT by jsanders2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: jsanders2001

I’m totally on board for it. And generally I’m not an early adopter, but I see so many upsides to this. The biggest is that I’m starting to get a bit old for drives up to Phoenix for concerts, the drive is starting to hurt the next day is getting rough. Gimme a self driving car and the drive is an opportunity to sleep before getting to bed. And even for not cross country, wanna eat at that restaurant across town but oh that drive... oh wait never mind let the car drive sit back and relax. And who wouldn’t rather spend the daily commute reading? I am very much on board for the self driving car.


73 posted on 05/31/2014 12:10:49 PM PDT by discostu (Seriously, do we no longer do "phrasing"?!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: null and void
Jimsonweed tea

Ah, the perfect drink for those who like their atropine, hyoscyamine and scopolamine organic...


74 posted on 05/31/2014 12:44:01 PM PDT by NoCmpromiz (John 14:6 is a non-pluralistic comment.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: A Formerly Proud Canadian
David Letterman should've made more movies while he had the chance.


75 posted on 05/31/2014 2:15:29 PM PDT by a fool in paradise (The new witchhunt: "Do you NOW, . . . or have you EVER , . . supported traditional marriage?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: discostu

> I’m totally on board for it. And generally I’m not an early adopter, but I see so many upsides to this. The biggest is that I’m starting to get a bit old for drives up to Phoenix for concerts, the drive is starting to hurt the next day is getting rough. Gimme a self driving car and the drive is an opportunity to sleep before getting to bed. And even for not cross country, wanna eat at that restaurant across town but oh that drive... oh wait never mind let the car drive sit back and relax. And who wouldn’t rather spend the daily commute reading? I am very much on board for the self driving car.

I am sorry, citizen. I cannot do that. According to IRSlink you still owe $750 in back taxes for 2013 and you only have $770 in your Citcount. It would require $63.22 of gasoline for the trip according SATlink and you taxes must be paid first before you are permitted to do that.

Think I’m kidding? Look at where we are today compared to 2007. It could happen...


76 posted on 05/31/2014 2:15:33 PM PDT by jsanders2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: jsanders2001

Everybody says that about everything. Meanwhile none of the plans for self driving cars have centralized control. so sorry that’s just bad luddite paranoia.


77 posted on 05/31/2014 2:39:11 PM PDT by discostu (Seriously, do we no longer do "phrasing"?!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: discostu

Tell Michael Hastings that...: )


78 posted on 05/31/2014 2:49:47 PM PDT by jsanders2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: jsanders2001

Sorry but the “controlled car” theory for Michael Hasting is the stupidest form of paranoia.


79 posted on 05/31/2014 3:19:12 PM PDT by discostu (Seriously, do we no longer do "phrasing"?!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: discostu

Breitbart, Fuddy and two of Obama’s former gay lovers would disagree...


80 posted on 05/31/2014 5:48:25 PM PDT by jsanders2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-86 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson