Posted on 05/28/2014 8:41:34 AM PDT by afraidfortherepublic
Oh no, Kate. Not again. How my heart sank when I saw the Duchess has had yet another embarrassing wardrobe malfunction, this time as she prepared to board a helicopter with her husband, William.
Pictures published yesterday by a German newspaper show Kate during the royal couples recent tour of Australia and New Zealand, when her flimsy Diane von Furstenberg frock was lifted sky-high by a gust from the choppers blades, exposing her bare bottom.
A cheeky passing photographer managed to capture the Duchesss rear in all its glory.
To make matters more humiliating, Kate appears to be wearing a thong that would make even a cheese cutter wince.
First, let me say that it was wrong of the newspaper to publish the pictures. The British press had refused to print them, but the shots had gone to the highest worldwide bidder.
And its terribly sad for Kate that her pert derriere will now be the image that forever marks any recollection of her and Williams triumphant tour.
How mortifying for any woman to be pictured in such an unedifying way.
But I couldnt help but think that surely Kate could have tried a little harder to keep her modesty under wraps? As a relatively seasoned member of the Royal Family, isnt it time she made more of an effort to cover up?
After all, every woman especially a public figure who is constantly photographed knows that a lightweight fly-away dress and the merest threat of a breeze hardly marks the right occasion to wear the skimpiest knickers in your drawer.
Indeed, sadly I feel there is barely a part of the Duchesss body that I havent seen. Its not so long ago that Kate was snapped topless on a French holiday with William.
(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...
And we'll give them the Kartrashians as a bonus.
What is the big deal? Would you prefer seeing Rosie O’donnell? I do have a problem with the paparazi. I wouldn’t care if a cannibal serial killer ate every one of them. Kate is all right in my book.
You are a gentleman and a scholar. That is one high-class hiney, to be sure.
Not according to the picture.
Imagine that it was Moochelle!!
(ha ha - total buzz-kill, guys) :-)
Michael the “prince” should be so proud...gag
Kate, you just plain bad. There ain’t no two ways about it.
So - what effect did the photo have on your appetite?
Kate is a very fit lady. Not many gals at the age of 30-something could be that fit.
I could understand a one time dress/skirt malfunction. But she keeps it up. On official tour, in Canada, flash bottom (first a couple of times & couple of yrs ago), then topless & bottomless photos (ok, that was in private territory) and then, on an official tour of Australia with her bare butt & way up legs flashing! It really isn’t that hard to keep her skirts or dresses down on official tours & engagements. It’s in bad taste, no excuses, and frankly it is appalling.
Found the pic online. Um, no. Wear shorts if you are always in the wind in short skirts. There are cute boy short panties too.
You freeper men will enjoy it.
Until you imagine our First Lady getting caught in an updraft wearing that thong.
I don’t think Katie & her hubby think much about monarchy in Britain. She & her family are much more of a nouveau riche celebrity than ‘traditional’ monarachy, not even eccentric aristocrats or nobility. Willie seems not to care much & he already got enough money too to move on.. I seriously wouldn’t be surprised if UK became a Republic after the Queen dies. Last few decades, the Queen is all that has been keeping the monarchy going in the UK. Rest of them are a mess. Good luck to them.
nothing wrong with that
Don't borrow trouble
It's good to be the king.
You got that right!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.