Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Americans Get Hundreds Of TV Channels, Can Still Only Handle 17
Wall Street Journal ^ | 05/07/2014 | Steven Perlberg

Posted on 05/07/2014 7:42:32 AM PDT by SeekAndFind

It seems every year Americans have more TV channel options than the year prior, but one number has remained consistent — 17.

That’s the average number of channels viewers actually tune in to.

In 2013, the average TV home received 189 channels, up from 129 in 2008, according to a new report from Nielsen. Back in 2008 Americans tuned in to an average of 17.3 channels, as opposed to this year’s 17.5 figure.

Maybe that’s all we channel-surfers can handle.

“This data is significant in that it substantiates the notion that more content does not necessarily equate to more channel consumption,” writes Nielsen. “And that means quality is imperative—for both content creators and advertisers. So the best way to reach consumers in a world with myriad options is to be the best option.”

(Excerpt) Read more at blogs.wsj.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Music/Entertainment; Society; TV/Movies
KEYWORDS: channels; qualitycounts; qualitycountslol; seventeen; tv
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-51 next last

1 posted on 05/07/2014 7:42:32 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

I’ve been happily stuck at zero channels for the past seven years.


2 posted on 05/07/2014 7:43:48 AM PDT by Rio (Proud resident of the State of Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I would love the option to choose to pay for only the few channels I want. I’m really tired of 25 Spanish stations, 136 sports stations, a History channel that seems locked on Ancient Aliens (with the world’s scariest hairdo’d idiot pretending he knows what he is talking about)....etc.


3 posted on 05/07/2014 7:45:10 AM PDT by Da Coyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Guess I am old enough to remember the days when we only had 4 channels, but were lucky to live high enough on a hill to get a couple more from Ohio.

Than that 5th. channel signed-on using something called “UHF” and it was da bomb.


4 posted on 05/07/2014 7:45:58 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

when you have 15 channels of QVC type channels, 15 sports channels, and a dozen left-wing news channels, it only makes it harder to find something worth watching.


5 posted on 05/07/2014 7:45:59 AM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (Haven't you lost enough freedoms? Support an end to the WOD now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

It’s not a matter of not being able to handle more channels, it’s a matter of very few channels are actually worth watching.


6 posted on 05/07/2014 7:46:16 AM PDT by Fresh Wind (The last remnants of the Old Republic have been swept away.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

“Americans Get Hundreds Of TV Channels, Can Still Only Handle 17”

Why over think it? It’s most likely that, out of all those channels, the average viewer only finds 17 or so that are of interest. Likely has nothing to do with being overwhelmed with channels. The variety leads to the number, IMO.


7 posted on 05/07/2014 7:47:18 AM PDT by PubliusMM (RKBA; a matter of fact, not opinion. 01-20-2016; I pray we make it that long.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Da Coyote

That would be great. I wonder how one would set up a satellite company that allows the people to subscribe only to the channels they want to watch.


8 posted on 05/07/2014 7:48:06 AM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (Haven't you lost enough freedoms? Support an end to the WOD now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Da Coyote

9 posted on 05/07/2014 7:49:20 AM PDT by null and void ( They don't think think they are above the law. They think they are the law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog

I remember those days too, in black & white.


10 posted on 05/07/2014 7:51:20 AM PDT by caver (Obama: Home of the Whopper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

What’s a TV channel?


11 posted on 05/07/2014 7:51:57 AM PDT by VanDeKoik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Da Coyote
I would love the option to choose to pay for only the few channels I want.
Ala carte programming will NEVER happen ... and why? "Viewership inequality," i.e., same as socialism.
Without all of us carrying the load, the lesser watched channels like Spanish language, religious, BET, Fear, etc., would disappear.
Can't have that!
12 posted on 05/07/2014 7:55:54 AM PDT by oh8eleven (RVN '67-'68)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

All them and I still end up watching reruns of I Love Lucy. </sarc>


13 posted on 05/07/2014 7:57:28 AM PDT by DonkeyBonker (Hard to paddle against the flow of sewage coming out of the White House.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rio

Mine is Netflix.


14 posted on 05/07/2014 7:58:33 AM PDT by DownInFlames
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: caver

We were the last house on the block to get color.
Just before Christmas 1975.

My dad had eight or nine black-and-white TV sets in the basement that people had given him. With that supply of spare parts and his military electronics training, he thought he’d never have to by another TV in his lifetime.

My mom forced him to buy a color set when us kids kept pestering her parents to come to their house to watch cartoons, the Thanksgiving Day parades, etc. in color.

Did not get cable until 1983 due to arcane political battles over who would get the franchise.


15 posted on 05/07/2014 7:58:56 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
I cut my cable when my bill went over $80. Basic was around $55 and then you had to add another tier to get Fox and ESPN. I have since heard that they have put ESPN on a different tier, so now you have to add another. Then they load taxes onto that. For every tier you add, you get one channel you want and 30 you'll never look at. So I said buh-bye. I watch local and if I want more than that, I go to Netflix, Hulu and Apple TV. Or I just turn it off! The cable companies have ruined their own industry. I don't miss them at all.

They are now doing the same thing to the internet, as my bill, which started out 6 years ago around $45, has now passed $60. So if they keep raising it, eventually I'll dump that as well. I don't think they realize how much business they are going to lose once people have to start paying thousands for "free" healthcare. Something has to give.

16 posted on 05/07/2014 8:00:01 AM PDT by ponygirl (Be Breitbart.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: oh8eleven
Without all of us carrying the load, the lesser watched channels like Spanish language, religious, BET, Fear, etc., would disappear. Can't have that!

I think you mean MSNBC and PBS.

17 posted on 05/07/2014 8:00:19 AM PDT by usurper (Liberals GET OFF MY LAWN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I dropped my cable a few years back. The channels I liked we’re spread out across “packages”. I as tired of paying $100.00+ a month and I only wanted to watch 10-12 depending. Lots of channels stay afloat that are watched hardly at all because they reside in a “package”. Oprah’s network is a prime example of this. Switch to al a carte and watch how quickly her’s and many other worthless channels (or channels with no demand) die.


18 posted on 05/07/2014 8:02:05 AM PDT by Ghost of SVR4 (So many are so hopelessly dependent on the government that they will fight to protect it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

We probably have over 500 channels (including about 200 HD duplicates of SD channels that we get), and there are probably about 25 to 30 channels that we watch with any regularity. It has nothing to do with how much we can handle and is instead a limitation of which channels have any programming that we are interested in watching.

Many times, especially during the lull where there are no good sport events active, we literally have 500+ channels and NOTHING worth watching available.


19 posted on 05/07/2014 8:05:48 AM PDT by VRWCmember
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: usurper
I think you mean MSNBC and PBS.
Actually, I think both would survive ala carte programming - pMSNBC would just get more money from NBC and PBS would just get more from the gubmint.
20 posted on 05/07/2014 8:07:08 AM PDT by oh8eleven (RVN '67-'68)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-51 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson