Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. music labels sue Pandora over royalties for golden oldies (pre-1972 recordings)
reuters ^ | Apr 18, 2014 | Joseph Ax

Posted on 04/23/2014 5:52:00 AM PDT by a fool in paradise

...The plaintiffs include Vivendi SA's Capitol Records Inc and UMG Recordings Inc, Sony Corp's Sony Music Entertainment, Warner Music Group Corp and ABKCO Music & Records Inc...

...Federal copyright law does not apply to pre-1972 recordings, but the plaintiffs say New York state law provides copyright protection for such recordings...

..."If we are required to obtain licenses for pre-1972 sound recordings to avoid liability and are unable to secure such licenses, then we may have to remove pre-1972 sound recordings from our service, which could harm our ability to attract and retain users," the company said in a regulatory filing in February...

(Excerpt) Read more at in.reuters.com ...


TOPICS: Computers/Internet; Music/Entertainment
KEYWORDS: copyright; copyrightlaw; pandora; streamingmusic
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

1 posted on 04/23/2014 5:52:00 AM PDT by a fool in paradise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: a fool in paradise

Ugh... We will be paying for Pandora before we know it.


2 posted on 04/23/2014 5:59:00 AM PDT by catfish1957 (Face it!!!! The government in DC is full of treasonous bastards)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: a fool in paradise

Hasn’t music that is older than 42 years served the copyright holders long enough?

It seems to me that after a generation has passed, the idea that playing that generation’s music preserves it. Also, how have radio stations been able to legally play music for free over the air waves for the past 90 or so years?

As the article states, sometimes due to deaths and legal issues, certain older copyrights are impossible to get licenses for. So the music, technically, cannot be played for any price.


3 posted on 04/23/2014 6:13:14 AM PDT by Alas Babylon!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alas Babylon!

Sort of like Disney getting extended copyrights on their old stuff.

Every 20 years or so, they pull out a few old items in remastered format, and sell them during a short window of time.

The Disney stuff extends some 70 years (or more).

==

If the old music recordings gain prominence again, look for Cher and Babs to do more Farewell tours.


4 posted on 04/23/2014 6:26:12 AM PDT by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Alas Babylon!
Also, how have radio stations been able to legally play music for free over the air waves for the past 90 or so years?

They do pay royalties for the songs they play.

5 posted on 04/23/2014 6:32:49 AM PDT by Maceman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Alas Babylon!

“Also, how have radio stations been able to legally play music for free over the air waves for the past 90 or so years?”

They haven’t, they have to pay royalties for all the copyrighted songs they play.


6 posted on 04/23/2014 6:35:05 AM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: a fool in paradise

I’ve seen entire albums posted on YouTube as “fair use.” I’d hate to be a professional musician these days.


7 posted on 04/23/2014 6:37:33 AM PDT by St_Thomas_Aquinas ( Isaiah 22:22, Matthew 16:19, Revelation 3:7)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Maceman
They do pay royalties for the songs they play.

There was a time (may still happen) when musicians would actually go from one smalltown radio station to the next and literally beg them to play the artist's recording on-air.

==

I do recall several years ago some of the record companies trying to get retro-royalties from internet radio stations. Many of those internet radio stations just relocated their IPs to foreign countries.


8 posted on 04/23/2014 6:45:44 AM PDT by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy
If the old music recordings gain prominence again, look for Cher and Babs to do more Farewell tours.

NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!

9 posted on 04/23/2014 6:46:57 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: a fool in paradise

So move out of New York State. Like everyone else.
Problem solved.


10 posted on 04/23/2014 6:47:47 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: catfish1957

Geez. There are no radio stations in our market that play pre-1972’s music. Pandora is our only option if we want to hear a variety of music styles. Jazz? Nada. Blues? Nada. Having been born in the 50’s, I’d like to be able to listen to music of my childhood - the 60’s decade. Actually, I like being able to listen to different genres from the 40’s to current. Would artists and labels prefer to go unheard and unbought because they’ve been relegated to irrelevancy in broadcast radio?


11 posted on 04/23/2014 7:03:44 AM PDT by TennesseeGirl (Those who don't know history are doomed to repeat it. - Edmund Burke 1790)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: St_Thomas_Aquinas

Howard Kaylan and Mark Volman of Turtles and Zappa & The Mothers fame were suing Sirius/XM to get royalty $ from their pre 1972 work.
And yes entire albums (Beatles etc) have been posted on youtube, but in some cases they have been taken down.

As a longtime college radio DJ, I have interviewed smaller-scale artists, etc. who have said the occasional song they do (like from a live performance) put on youtube is OK as it helps promote them. A whole album or concert is another matter. On my radio show I’m restricted to playing only 3 songs or so by a certain artist/from that artist’s album. Of course if I have a local performer in the studio and he does 6 or 7 songs live,
and we get his permission for the streaming or even a podcast, that’s fine(we may label it as “single” or “live”)...


12 posted on 04/23/2014 7:06:06 AM PDT by raccoonradio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: TennesseeGirl

Cambridge/Boston area has WJIB 740 “The Memories Station”, basically a one man operation. They don’t stream. More that a bit of their music is pre 1972.
College stations like the one I’m on nr Boston do feature blues, jazz etc (sorry to hear that you don’t have that option) and we’ll have pre-72 stuff (Muddy Waters, Ray Charles etc)
If you have a smartphone or even your PC try http://www.TuneIn.com which will give you just about every station on the air as well as some streamers.


13 posted on 04/23/2014 7:09:05 AM PDT by raccoonradio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Alas Babylon!

Warner Bros. claims they own the copyright on “Happy Birthday To You” for 100 years (meaning their claim will expire in the 2030s if the laws are not revised once again to extend ownership).

Of course it is clear that “Good Morning To You” (which Happy Birthday’s melody is taken from) is much older than 100 years.

And there are persons who are still alive who lost ownership of their songs decades ago (or were never compensated even when money was owed by thieving labels like Atlantic). If “anyone” could release the songs, the artists could release their own “signature” edition and still make some bank on their work.

100 year copyrights only serve the interests of the few corporations that own the bulk of the material.


14 posted on 04/23/2014 7:14:37 AM PDT by a fool in paradise (The new witchhunt: "Do you NOW, . . . or have you EVER , . . supported traditional marriage?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: a fool in paradise

If the big music plaintiffs in this case will begin paying royalties to the inventors back through history of all the wonderful technology & gadgets which make their music empire spossible, then I might listen to their complaints.

Patents expire after 20 years now. Why do the “artistes” intellectual property rights not do the same?


15 posted on 04/23/2014 7:16:33 AM PDT by BwanaNdege
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Maceman
They do pay royalties for the songs they play.

Originally the Supreme Court decided that they didn't (just as someone making a recording of a song didn't have to pay the publisher of the sheet music).

But the musicians unions were losing out on radio gigs when stations played records. Stations still pay into a fund to give live musicians paying gigs.

16 posted on 04/23/2014 7:17:38 AM PDT by a fool in paradise (The new witchhunt: "Do you NOW, . . . or have you EVER , . . supported traditional marriage?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy
There was a time (may still happen) when musicians would actually go from one smalltown radio station to the next and literally beg them to play the artist's recording on-air.

Joe Strummer is seen doing this in a documentary about him (possibly in NYC) trying to promote his career after the Clash had folded. He couldn't get on the radio, even if he offered to drop by on air.

17 posted on 04/23/2014 7:19:50 AM PDT by a fool in paradise (The new witchhunt: "Do you NOW, . . . or have you EVER , . . supported traditional marriage?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: a fool in paradise

This is how the founding fathers addressed this:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copyright_Act_of_1790


18 posted on 04/23/2014 7:21:17 AM PDT by B Knotts (Just another Tenther)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: raccoonradio; TennesseeGirl
Paul Berlin is still on the radio in Houston (on Saturdays from 6pm-8pm CST) although it'd be better if he had someone in studio to help him cue the CDs.

He does actually DJ (with the patter and details that today's "announcers" or "hosts" don't have). He's in the rock and roll hall of fame (and surprising that he's still in radio) in part because he was booking shows going back to the 1950s.

http://ksevradio.com/programs/paul-berlin

"Hear the music of the 40′s, 50′s and 60′s along with the first hand accounts of the artists, the shows and the people of Houston who love it. Both then and now.

Have a request for Paul Berlin? Scroll down and type the name of the song and the artist in the “reply” box below. Great news! Paul Berlin is back!

After successful surgery and time to recuperate, Paul has returned to the KSEV microphone. Listen to Paul’s statement on the audio player below. We appreciate the many good wishes for Paul. And, thanks for listening to the pre-recorded Paul Berlin shows from the past these last few weekends.

Listen to Paul Berlin right now! Click on the audio player below to hear Paul’s most recent radio shows..."

19 posted on 04/23/2014 7:27:43 AM PDT by a fool in paradise (The new witchhunt: "Do you NOW, . . . or have you EVER , . . supported traditional marriage?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: a fool in paradise
Federal copyright law does not apply to pre-1972 recordings, but the plaintiffs say New York state law provides copyright protection for such recordings.

I think there is something missing from this. Federal copyright is eternal, and certainly covers recordings going back to the 20s. Perhaps there is a different law concerning (re)transmission that they are talking about.

20 posted on 04/23/2014 8:14:51 AM PDT by zeugma (Don't cry because it's over, smile because it happened - Dr. Seuss (I'll see you again someday Hope))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson