Posted on 03/27/2014 10:36:11 AM PDT by Theoria
Matt Knapp thinks that Bigfoot research is a mess right now.
The facts are that in terms of progress, the Bigfoot research community has ultimately made none. We are no closer now to proving these creatures exist than we were 40 years ago, Knapp told Boston.
Knapp blames the setbacks on the digital age, and the amount of misinformation being spread in the form of photos and videos online. That, and the fact that more people seem to be trying to cash in on what they claim are legitimate Bigfoot sightings. Self admittedly, up to this point, we have not had anything worth presenting as real evidence of this creatures existence. If we want scientists to get involved, we have to go by their standards, not our anecdotal ones, he said.
To help filter out the phonies and fakes all trying to make a quick buck on something he believes in, Knapp is asking those vested in Bigfoot research to rely on technology built out of MIT to prove that the truth is out there.
Knapp, who runs a blog called Bigfoot Crossroads, a personal site with updates about all things Sasquatch, recently stumbled upon an invention created by students and researchers in the MIT Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Lab in Cambridge in 2012, called Eulerian Video Magnification.
EVM is essentially a software that allows users to break down videos to reveal things in them that are invisible to the naked eye.
(Excerpt) Read more at bostonmagazine.com ...
I won’t share my blueberry bagels with anybody! ;’)
I remember that topic, Newaygo Co is rural, but not nearly as much as it used to be. I have my doubts about her story, particularly “a family of ten of them”. :’)
I thought ya had to use Jack Links beefjerky.
Compared to what they would eat out in the woods (if they exists), Jack Links beef jerky is a big step up on the evolutionary ladder, LOL.
Thanks Inyo-Mono. If Patterson had just shot the thing, there wouldn’t be any need to examine the film. :’) The camera he used had a FPS adjustment, which of course confounds the analyses (this was pointed out by Krantz).
The late Grover Krantz wanted a type specimen, and suggested that the only way to get one would be to hunt one down from the air, since the wild areas where they’re reported aren’t easy to cover on the ground, plus the critter can pretty much disarticulate a human in a few seconds.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grover_Krantz#Bigfoot_research
You are wicked...
Let’s review the circumstances in play here:
-Bigfoots exist.
-Bigfoots have several abilities which defy convention science.
-The government and industry conspire to keep them a mystery to protect government research and industrial resources.
Ergo, Bigfoots will never ‘exist’ in popular culture even if one lives in your back yard.
Consider what the native Americans have to say about them.
If they can, maybe they'll also solve the mystery of Piltdown Man. After that they can get to work on the Bush National Guard Memos, along with figuring out where those flying saucers came from that Orson Wells was reporting on in 1938.
” Consider what the native Americans have to say about them.”
I give up. What do we have to say about them? :)
I never gave it much thought ‘til I lived in WA.
All I can say is you don’t want to encounter them. And if you do you will never forget it.
Check out some of the reports on BFRO.net.
I’ve only heard them.
I like to think that there is a Bigfoot out there. Have heard stories from reasonable people of tracks, “nests”, etc. A guy I worked with couldn’t make a job once as he had to travel 6 hours one-way to investigate a Bigfoot sighting with some air on a fence. With a University of Washington professor. He was a game warden. Made me think they either have WAY too large a budget, do a GREAT PR job, or they think there is something to it.
The other point some person made was (a skeptic on all of these types of things), what makes the human mind come up with these similar stories, across the globe and across the ages? That is an interesting take on it.
For me? I hope there is a Bigfoot; and I hope none ever are confirmed. Then it will just be the rare North American Ape - and what fun is that!? Plus, it will become the greatest friend the EPA and the envirowackos ever had!. “It does not matter if you have never seen a Bigfoot on your property. See these big trees? And the ferns? That is Bigfoot habitat.”
Their was air on MOST of the fence. A tuft of HAIR was caught on one of the barbs though - where the farmer had seen the creature walk over.
He never did say what the UW guy found with the DNA. First was “They are still doing the testing”, and later became “Yeah - I never heard.”
5.56mm
All kidding aside, there are several undocumented reports of bigfoots on the reservation here in New Mexico. Wood knocking and howling at night. Large dark figures on ridgelines in deserted areas that have no tree cover. Reports of red eyes even. Scratches on a house trailer.
Like you, I haven’t seen one and I don’t want to encounter one either.
How may stories from all over the world over how many hundreds of years are there about dragons, vampires, zombies, ghosts, Martians, and Atlantis?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.