I'm sure that's true. But, Knox's change in alibis, especially her story that her boss (later determined to be innocent) committed the crime, sure make her look guilty.
Have you even bothered to look at Rudy Guede's alibis???
And his DNA is all over the crime scene but not Knox's.
And he has already been convicted of the murder.
How come she didn't point to Rudy as the murderer if she was there with him at the time as prosecutors allege???
I don't find Knox's identification of Patrick Lumumba as the killer to be exceptionally damaging. Knox had been interrogated by the police for 36 hours straight at the point she named Lumumba. I find Knox's story that the identification of Lumumba was coerced by the police believable.
To me, the more damaging story was the initial story that she spent the entire night (for the first time) at her boyfriend's place. That story was disproved by phone and text records and her boyfriend's testimony upon his own interrogation by the police.
Its not that difficult to be in the wrong place at the wrong time, it happened to me once. Until it happens to you/anybody, its hard to convince authorities otherwise.
In my case it worked out, but could have easily gone the other way. Police get it in their head that you are the guy, doesn`t matter what you say.
In my case they just said sign here, had no idea what was written, just needed to get out of there
Now we are talking Italy, completely different ball game
I am whole heart idly convinced of her innocence.
If I was President of The USA, I would today address the press that as long as I was President, Amanda Knox has nothing to worry about, I would also make it known to Italian authorities that I was very unhappy with their 3rd world system