[Uncle Chip]

But, Knox's change in alibis, especially her story that her boss (later determined to be innocent) committed the crime, sure make her look guilty.

Have you even bothered to look at Rudy Guede's alibis???

And his DNA is all over the crime scene but not Knox's.

And he has already been convicted of the murder.

How come she didn't point to Rudy as the murderer if she was there with him at the time as prosecutors allege???

[Tired of Taxes]

Guede was found guilty of the crime.

We don't know if Knox and her boyfriend are innocent or guilty, too. But, as stated above, Knox's changing of her alibi does not make her appear innocent.

How come she didn't point to Rudy as the murderer if she was there with him at the time as prosecutors allege???

Well, IF she's guilty, maybe she didn't want to implicate the real killer because then she'd implicate herself...?

Why are you so sure that she's innocent?