Posted on 01/21/2014 3:49:49 PM PST by doug from upland
THE VIDEO THAT HAS GONE VIRAL AND RESULTED IN RESIGNATION OF THE VICE PRINCIPAL
bump
Jamie and her attorney will be on with John & Ken at 5pm Pacific. http://www.kfi640.com
It is too bad she taped it without assistance of law enforcement. With such assistance, it could have been used as evidence in a criminal trial. This call cannot be used as evidence because a phone conversation in California requires both parties to have knowledge that the conversation is being recorded.
>>This call cannot be used as evidence because a phone conversation in California requires both parties to have knowledge that the conversation is being recorded.<<
Even more sad, the victim might be subject to criminal and civil penalties.
When the VP recovers from the shock and gets the “anger” stage this could rebound badly.
That’s a damn shame. Was wondering the same thing. I hope she gets justice. If not, I will bet you the perv will get “the internet treatment”.
I would have liked to have seen a video of the perp when she found out it was recorded and on youtube.
It might not can be used in a criminal court but it has already begun to make this guys life miserable.
Surely some lawyer somewhere needs to pay for some sins by filing a series of frivolous lawsuits against guy to bankrupt him.
Might it be that the statute of limitations has run and,as a result,no prosecution is possible? I'm not a lawyer so I don't know.
Even more sad, the victim might be subject to criminal and civil penalties.
There's not a prosecutor in the land that would touch this case.And as for civil penalties you'd have to get a jury of NAMLA members to award the teacher even a penny.
It’s a woman
No matter. She can still be sued.
I am at work and video is blocked on the computer
doesn’t really matter though. Child predators need to be eliminated, or at least removed from society
http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/displaycode?section=pen&group=00001-01000&file=630-638
“631. (a) Any person who, by means of any machine, instrument, or
contrivance, or in any other manner, intentionally taps, or makes any
unauthorized connection, whether physically, electrically,
acoustically, inductively, or otherwise, with any telegraph or
telephone wire, line, cable, or instrument, including the wire, line,
cable, or instrument of any internal telephonic communication
system, or who willfully and without the consent of all parties to
the communication, or in any unauthorized manner, reads, or attempts
to read, or to learn the contents or meaning of any message, report,
or communication while the same is in transit or passing over any
wire, line, or cable, or is being sent from, or received at any place
within this state; or who uses, or attempts to use, in any manner,
or for any purpose, or to communicate in any way, any information so
obtained, or who aids, agrees with, employs, or conspires with any
person or persons to unlawfully do, or permit, or cause to be done
any of the acts or things mentioned above in this section, is
punishable by a fine not exceeding two thousand five hundred dollars
($2,500), or by imprisonment in the county jail not exceeding one
year, or by imprisonment pursuant to subdivision (h) of Section 1170,
or by both a fine and imprisonment in the county jail or pursuant to
subdivision (h) of Section 1170.”
“32. (a) Every person who, intentionally and without the consent of
all parties to a confidential communication, by means of any
electronic amplifying or recording device, eavesdrops upon or records
the confidential communication, whether the communication is carried
on among the parties in the presence of one another or by means of a
telegraph, telephone, or other device, except a radio, shall be
punished by a fine not exceeding two thousand five hundred dollars
($2,500), or imprisonment in the county jail not exceeding one year,
or in the state prison, or by both that fine and imprisonment. If the
person has previously been convicted of a violation of this section
or Section 631, 632.5, 632.6, 632.7, or 636, the person shall be
punished by a fine not exceeding ten thousand dollars ($10,000), by
imprisonment in the county jail not exceeding one year, or in the
state prison, or by both that fine and imprisonment.”
The prosecutor nay not have a choice and the chances are this would be tried by a judge not in front of a jury.
Stranger things have happened.
She should have contacted an attorney before confronting her abuser and then publicizing it.
That is what is so sad.
>>Might it be that the statute of limitations has run and,as a result,no prosecution is possible?<<
I had to scratch my head — the recording just occurred. No way any statute of limitations has run.
Jamie needs to stop living a life dominated by her Victim archetype. It’s ruining her life... what is done is done. Move on.
That’s all I can really say without inviting a flamefest upon myself.
Transcript and more info
It was a female teacher. A homosexual relationship.
He may end up dead if he does that.
I'm not suggesting that what she did wasn't,strictly speaking,a criminal offense.But seriously...is their a government prosecutor who's slimy enough or stupid enough to go forward with this? And as for discretion,it's my understanding that prosecutors only get into *legal* trouble when they *prosecute* inappropriately.Of course they can get into trouble,job security wise,by *failing* to prosecute.
No,that comment was a response to the suggestion that the *teacher* might be prosecuted.
There’s a reason why most crimes have a statute of limitations.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.