Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

ART LAFFER: I Was Wrong About Inflation And The Fed
Business Insider ^ | 01/03/2014 | Rob Wile

Posted on 01/03/2014 10:22:34 AM PST by SeekAndFind

Arthur Laffer is a legend in Washington, having been the leading voice on President Ronald Reagan's hawkish Economic Policy Advisory Board. 

His "Laffer Curve," which argued that there are diminishing returns after a certain point of taxation, was taken as gospel.

If his views are not quite as frequent a presence in public debate, it's largely because Laffer's pet issues, regulation and taxes, took a back seat during the George W. Bush and Barack Obama administrations.  

But Laffer himself still occasionally makes appearances on the public scene.

And in June of 2009, he penned an op-ed warning excessive quantitative easing would inevitably lead to higher inflation and interest rates.

...we haven't ever seen anything like this in the U.S. To date what's happened is potentially far more inflationary than were the monetary policies of the 1970s, when the prime interest rate peaked at 21.5% and inflation peaked in the low double digits ...Gold prices went from $35 per ounce to $850 per ounce, and the dollar collapsed on the foreign exchanges. It wasn't a pretty picture.

Obviously, nothing like that happened.

In an interview with Business Insider from his office in Tennessee, Laffer admitted that he was wrong. The old maxim that dictates increasing the availability of cash through lower interest rates will lead to higher prices, he said, may need to be reexamined. 

"Usually when you find the model this far off, you've probably got something wrong with the model, not that the world has changed," he said. "Inflation does not appear to be monetary base driven," he said. 

He's not totally comfortable with what the Fed is doing, however. "Ask me whether inflation represents longer term problem, I think there's a potential there for excess reserves to create problems."

But it now seems impossible to predict.

(Excerpt) Read more at businessinsider.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Society
KEYWORDS: artlaffer; fed; inflation; laffercurve; tennessee
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-147 last
To: Toddsterpatriot
Try again. Estimated declines in United States manufacturing output in selected sectors (1872–1876)[26] Industry % decline in output Durable goods 30% Iron and steel 45% Construction 30% Overall 10% From the source of your graph. Overall, 10% decline in output.

But GDP per person was way up. Businesses evolve, resources get allocated differently.

And this. In the US, from 1873–1879, 18,000 businesses went bankrupt, including hundreds of banks, and ten states went bankrupt

In a dynamic economy new, more efficient, businesses will replace businesses that refuse to keep up with the times. The bottom line is overall economic activity, and that was way up in the 1873 to 1880 period.

141 posted on 01/09/2014 2:55:28 PM PST by Partisan Gunslinger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

When you offshore your manufacturing base and put 11% of your workers on a FedGov™ stipend it is tough to induce inflation. The way they do easing the money ends up in stocks and NEVER makes it to the”common” man. Why is a 30 yr mort at 3.5% still? In this climate a 30 yr note should only be 2% or less.


142 posted on 01/09/2014 3:02:56 PM PST by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Partisan Gunslinger

200 Years of American Financial Crises

143 posted on 01/10/2014 4:47:02 PM PST by Toddsterpatriot (Science is hard. Harder if you're stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies]

To: central_va
Why is a 30 yr mort at 3.5% still? In this climate a 30 yr note should only be 2% or less.

A 30 year Treasury yields 3.80% and you think a mortgage should yield half that? LOL!

You're funny.

144 posted on 01/10/2014 8:48:01 PM PST by Toddsterpatriot (Science is hard. Harder if you're stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot

Confirms the Great Depression as the grandaddy of them all, by far.


145 posted on 01/11/2014 1:44:34 PM PST by Partisan Gunslinger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies]

To: Partisan Gunslinger

Yes, as Friedman said, the Fed did it.


146 posted on 01/11/2014 2:36:55 PM PST by Toddsterpatriot (Science is hard. Harder if you're stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Professor Hans Werner Sinn, an economist and Fellow of the National Bureau of Economic Research in Cambridge (USA), stated an interesting hypothesis in a recent lecture. According to him, fiat money creation depresses interest rates because savers cannot compete with the printing press as the low-cost provider of capital. (Long lecture 1 hr, 35 min. in German.)

My professors taught that inflation leads to higher interest rates because savers demand a premium to make up for the devalued dollars they will receive at the end of the loan. But this assumes that savers have an alternative market for their money. The current situation shows that this is not always the case. How many investors do we hear complain that there is no place to put their money in today's market.

Interesting.

147 posted on 09/21/2014 12:59:14 PM PDT by T Ruth (Islam shall be defeated.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-147 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson