The Guardian Slams Funding of Anti-Global Warming Groups

Canada Free Press ^ | 1/2/2014 | Alan Caruba

[rktman]

The Guardian, a London-based daily newspaper, has been a leading advocate of the global warming theory—now called climate change—and its December 20 edition published an article by Susanne Goldenberg, “Conservative groups spend up to $1bn a year to fight action on climate change.”

[rktman]

Evil oil company alert. "If you like your elec bill, you can keep your elec bill."

[Paladin2]

If you like your Expedition Ship packed in ice, you can keep it packed in ice, even in the Summer.

[rktman]

May be under ice soon.

[adorno]

“Conservative groups spend up to $1bn a year to fight action on climate change.”

Not nearly enough.

Conservatives and all others should be spending $100 billion and more to fight the destruction of science by the global warming activists and shysters.

[Viennacon]

Oh, if only the Guardianistas could be stuck on a ship in the arctic.

[Blood of Tyrants]

The unusual summer blizzard in Antarctica is caused by globull warming. It really, really is.

[cripplecreek]

Unfortunately we’re on our own since much of corporate America has figured out how to milk the global warming cow for subsidies and higher rates.

[Vince Ferrer]

Yet they sponsor the idiotic voyage to get trapped in Antartic ice that doesn’t exist, and even send a reporter along on the ship.

[FlingWingFlyer]

“Anti-global warming groups?” I’m not against global warming. Scam artists, con men and hoaxes do piss me off though.

[Vince Ferrer]

Oh, if only the Guardianistas could be stuck on a ship in the arctic

They were, they sent a reporter on that ship.

[Viennacon]

Only 1? Pity.

[InterceptPoint]

May be under ice soon.
++++++
Perhaps you jest. But then again, perhaps not. It is summertime down under. And we are definitely talking down under. Way, way down under.

It seems to me that there is a good possibility that this ship is lost for good. Stuck in the summer facing a harsh winter and then more Ironic Global Cooling the following summer.

Not a favorable outlook.

[SkyDancer]

[Ingtar]

Isn’t the Guardian the paper who prides itself on having their retirement in Green and Global Warming stocks? Bias much?

[cripplecreek]

I’m for it.

[Little Ray]

Anthropogenic Global Warming (now Athropogenic Global Climate Change since that is harder to disprove...) is a tenet of “Gaia Worship.” So of course they’re mad at the infidels.

[oldenuff2no]

They are just upset that people will spend money to fight the globull climate con game that the liberals are finding so profitable. Liberal research depends on grants to survive. Just because there is not proof of anything they are researching does not mean one should give up their income or their job. The only scientific future they have is to prolong this extortion. The fantasy of globull warming is a global cottage industry. There is not one single prediction that has come true or a single climate model that has even been close to historical reality. These scam artists have been caught lying many times. They have even been caught in published emails conspiring to spread absolute lies about their research but they still push on to obtain more grants, other peoples money to maintain this scam.

The best example of the whole of globall warming is locked in the ice in Antarctica. They are frozen in place by ice they said is not there in a place the claimed was open water for miles around all because of their delusional predictions of globull warming. There is no doubt in my mind that they are using that time to invent another "fact" that somehow rationalizes their situation as being more proof of globull warming.

If at first you don't succeed tell a bigger lie. Algore taught them that.

[jeffc]

Respond to their article with a message/email: "Thanks for reminding me to donate another $100 to < name of a conservative anti-AGW group >".

It doesn't have to be true. Just so it sticks in their craw.

[plain talk]

Private funding = bad. Public funding = good. Go figure.

[spawn44]

How dare you not believe the MANIPULATED and CHERRY PICKED data we put forth, how dare you.