Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Lead Developer Of HPV Vaccines Comes Clean, Warns Parents & Young Girls It’s All A Giant Deadly Scam
FEEL Guide ^ | JULY 16, 2013 | BRENT LAMBERT

Posted on 12/30/2013 1:08:18 PM PST by Pharmboy

Dr. Diane Harper was a leading expert responsible for the Phase II and Phase III safety and effectiveness studies which secured the approval of the human papilloma virus (HPV) vaccines, Gardasil™ and Cervarix™. Dr. Harper also authored many of the published, scholarly papers about the vaccines. She is now the latest in a long string of experts who are pressing the red alert button on the devastating consequences and irrelevancy of these vaccines. Dr. Harper made her surprising confession at the 4th International Converence on Vaccination which took place in Reston, Virginia. Her speech, which was originally intended to promote the benefits of the vaccines, took a 180-degree turn when she chose instead to clean her conscience about the deadly vaccines so she “could sleep at night”. The following is an excerpt from a story by Sarah Cain:

“Dr. Harper explained in her presentation that the cervical cancer risk in the U.S. is already extremely low, and that vaccinations are unlikely to have any effect upon the rate of cervical cancer in the United States. In fact, 70% of all HPV infections resolve themselves without treatment in a year, and the number rises to well over 90% in two years.

(Excerpt) Read more at feelguide.com ...


TOPICS: Health/Medicine; Science; Society
KEYWORDS: billgates; cdc; cervicalcancer; dianeharper; drdianeharper; gardasil; hpv; hpvvaccine; hpvvaccinescam; nwo; perry; rickperry; shameful; vaccine; vaccinehoax
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081 last
To: Marie

“This is a direct quote from the actual interview. Not taken out of context. The whole thing is a cut and paste.”

What is a direct quote? What interview? What is “cut and paste?” I have no idea what you are talking about here.

“How can anyone say that another’s argument is ‘accurate’ but misleading?”

This is the whole point of the Snopes article, or at least half the article....it is not enough to know that someone suffered from a health problem following a vaccine, you need to determine if the health problem was caused by the vaccine. After all, if you look at any large group of people for any reasonable length of time, some of those people are going to have health problems.

“I did read the part about the comparison group. What comparison group? Are we talk about other vaccines? The placebo? No details at all to that statement.”

Did you follow the link that Snopes gave? They are pretty good about things like that. Here it is again...

http://www.cdc.gov/vaccinesafety/Vaccines/HPV/Index.html

And here you will find....

“Adverse events in the HPV vaccinated population were compared to another appropriate population (such as adolescents vaccinated with vaccines other than HPV)...”


81 posted on 01/01/2014 9:01:18 PM PST by JoeDetweiler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson