Posted on 12/30/2013 1:08:18 PM PST by Pharmboy
Dr. Diane Harper was a leading expert responsible for the Phase II and Phase III safety and effectiveness studies which secured the approval of the human papilloma virus (HPV) vaccines, Gardasil and Cervarix. Dr. Harper also authored many of the published, scholarly papers about the vaccines. She is now the latest in a long string of experts who are pressing the red alert button on the devastating consequences and irrelevancy of these vaccines. Dr. Harper made her surprising confession at the 4th International Converence on Vaccination which took place in Reston, Virginia. Her speech, which was originally intended to promote the benefits of the vaccines, took a 180-degree turn when she chose instead to clean her conscience about the deadly vaccines so she could sleep at night. The following is an excerpt from a story by Sarah Cain:
Dr. Harper explained in her presentation that the cervical cancer risk in the U.S. is already extremely low, and that vaccinations are unlikely to have any effect upon the rate of cervical cancer in the United States. In fact, 70% of all HPV infections resolve themselves without treatment in a year, and the number rises to well over 90% in two years.
(Excerpt) Read more at feelguide.com ...
Yup. And many of the loudest ones wer for Rudy in the cycle prior to that.
Is it any wonder then why so many of us have turned hardened skeptics, and are reluctant to get our kids ANY vaccine?
A criminal act that should have landed him in jail.
They must be Common Core graduates. They use same “logic” I always rail against.
“Oh I’m a staunch conservative!” And then support the biggest liberals the GOP throws out there EVERY DAMN TIME.
...and expect no one to notice or call them on it. And when someone does, “WE” are the problem, not their ethical flexibility.
And all these expert opinions were supplied by the lobbyists for the manufacturer of the vaccines who also offered to pay big bucks for making their product mandatory. For the right fee I can obtain an expert medical opinion that says anything I want.
Perry did the leftist tyranny thing.
He was convinced by “experts” that it was good, so he decided it should be MANDATED for all.
No individual freedom in that idea.
Follow the crony money.
Well, duh...
Dr. Harper's comments have also been taken far out of context here, which is probably the reason why this report comes from a source like the FEEL Guide.
I don't know what is fact and what is fiction, but in this case, and knowing the large and highly motivated anti-vaccine movement out there, I'd take what's being claimed here with a very large grain of salt.
I see Snopes has already offered their opinion on this story. Forbes also did a story on this. Personally, I'd be more inclined to believe these two sources than something printed in the FEEL Guide, but that's just me....and I haven't even looked for other sources supporting what is being claimed here - although I do find it unusual that such a significant revelation hasn't garnered more publicity from more well-known sources.
A couple to consider:
Have to Pay for Vioxx.
Anything post the 1986 indemnification legislation is suspect.
When I first became a pharmacist the research by Merck was the gold standard in the pharmaceutical industry. They were trusted and with good reason. Their drug trials were first class and without bias. If they published it, it was true to the best of their very high research standards.
Sadly today, Merck is no longer driven by ethical research standards. This is very sad. They are no longer to be trusted.
Michelle Bachmann was correct and dismantled by conservatives for telling the truth. Shame on us for all who were injured by this rotten vaccine.
Y’all do know it is mandated for your chilluns in Obamacare.
Luckily for me, mine are grown.
uh huh, I was insulted many a time for declaring this vaccine a danger from reading about the effects.
We all know what Snopes is, right? It was started and run by a husband and a wife for many years, and it still may be. It is not some verification organization of any sort. Moreover, it has been proven that the husband and wife who run Snopes are leftwing nuts who often lied to protect the Clintons back in the day. In my view, Snopes is completely untrustworthy. Snopes is a scam that ought now to be cited as some source of credibility. They have no credibility.
Show me where they’re wrong.
Snopes is untrustworthy. I don’t ping their site.
Boy, wonder how Rick Perry feels, now?
Hmmm... You know... A douchebag and friends could make a mint applying this principle to consumer products. Oh, wait...
Got you tagged now.
Heartless.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.