Mass Flow Calorimetry System for Scaled up Experiments on Anomalous Heat Evolution

UM system.edu ^ | Kitamura

[Kevmo]

A Mass - Flow - Calorimetry System for Scaled - up Experiments on Anomalous Heat Evolution at Elevated Temperatures #

A. Kitamura
1 , 2 , A. Takahashi 1, 3 , R. Seto 1 , Y. Fujita 1 , A. Taniike 2 and Y. Furuyama 2 1

Technova Inc. ,
Japan ,
kitamuraakira3@gmail.com 2
Kobe University, Japan, 3
Osaka University, Japan We have been studying phenomena of anomalous heat evolution from hydrogen - isotope - load ed nano - composite samples at elevated temperatures as well as at room temperature using a twin absorption system [1 , 2 ] .

Recent experiments have use d Ni - based nano - composite samples ; Pd 1 Ni 7 /ZrO 2 ( “ PNZ ” ), Ni/ZrO 2 ( “ NZ ” ) , Cu 0. 08 1 Ni 0. 36 /ZrO 2 ( “ CNZ ” ) and Cu 0. 21 Ni 0. 21 /ZrO 2 ( “ CNZII ” ). The results of measurements have been presented in the meetings of the 12 th J apan CF - Researc h Society (JCF 12 ) , the 17 th International Conference on Condensed Matter Nuclear Science (ICCF17) and the 13 th J apan CF - Research Society (JCF13), and have been/will be published in [3], [4] and [5], respectively.

These will be summarized , and the time - de pendent data will be re - analyzed in another paper by A. Takahashi in this Conference for speculating heat releasing mechanisms during the several - week - lasted phase of D(H) - loading into the nano - composite samples .

As will be shown there , a lot of interesting , even astonishing, features are involved; b urst - like heat release with a nomalously high values of differential heat of sorption ( η ) reaching ca. 600 eV/ atom - H , large values of i ntegrated heat reach ing ca. 800 eV/atom - Ni from the CNZ sample absorbing H, and abrupt desorption with absorbed energy of 50 - 80 eV/atom - Ni observed almost exclusively in the first 573 - K run for each sample . To confirm the interesting phenomena , repeated measurements with improved signal - to - noise ratio are required .

Since the easiest way for this is to increase the sample amount, we have fabricated a reaction chamber with a ten - times - larger volume than in - being one. Another important improvement is a mass flow calorimetry ap plied to the system using an oil cool ant with a boiling point of 390 deg - C. Moreover, to make residual gas mass spectral analysis in A = 1 - 6 amu r ange , a QMA system is going to be installed in the line of the apparatus. In the presentation we will show the schematics of this new oil - cooling mass - flow calorimetry system for observing anomalous heat evolution in H(D) - gas charging to Ni - based nano - composite samples and for calibration runs using blank alumina sample. [1]

Akira Kitamura, Yuki Miyoshi, Akira Taniike, Akito Takahashi, Reiko Seto and Yushi Fujita ; J. Condensed Matter Nucl. Sci. 4 (2011) 56 - 68. [2] Y. Miyoshi, H. Sakoh, A. Taniike, A. Kitamura, A. Takahashi, R. Seto and Y. Fujita; J . C ondensed M atter N ucl. S ci. 10 (2013) 46 - 62. [ 3 ] Y. Miyoshi, H. Sakoh, A. Taniike, A. Kitamura, A. Takahashi, R. Set o and Y. Fujita; Proc. JCF12 (2012) 1 - 9. [ 4 ] H. Sakoh, Y. Miyoshi, A. Taniike, Y. Furuyama, A. Kitamura, A. Takahashi, R. Seto, Y. Fujita, T. Murota, T. Tahara ; to be published in Proc. ICCF17 . [5] H. Sakoh, Y. Miyoshi, A. Taniike, Y. Furuyama, A. Kitamura , A. Takahashi, R. Seto, Y. Fujita, T. Murota, T. Tahara ; to be published in Proc. J CF1 3

[Wonder Warthog]

"My real guess is that there is no anomalous heat. Just poorly trained scientists pretending to be experimentalists and not knowing how to measure nanoscopic changes in temperature measurement."

Why guess??? Why not actually study the published data, and know???

[Wonder Warthog]

"I can tell by the arrogant tone of your reply that you are young and conceited and still wet behind the ears. My advice to you: speak respectfully to people senior to you who have more real world experience and have more time here on Free Republic than you have out of the baby carriage."

How about if "I" answer that?? Semi-retired PhD chemist with nuclear background and forty years of hands-on science practice. Note also that I joined FR in 1998.

So I qualify as having both more real-world experience AND time on FR. I suggest that you need to study the topic a bit and find out what the reality is.

Beaudette's book is THE best place to start if you want to find out the reality of LENR.

Yeah, Kevmo is a bit hot-tempered, but given the flack he catches from idiots who think they are comedians, or pseudo-science types who haven't actually studied the subject, it's a bit understandable.

[Kevmo]

I’ve been a freeper far longer than you, short pants. I signed up 2 months after JimRob. You’re none too bright, it would seem.

If you’re a professional mathematician then give us a treatment of the odds that this phenomena could have been the result of measurement error, seein’ as how it’s been replicated more than 14,700 times.

[Kevmo]

No, I’ve only insulted those who deserved it. Mostly you.

asked & answered

——————www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@eskimo.com/msg87491.html-——————

[Kevmo]

Yeah, Kevmo is a bit hot-tempered
***But, but, but... I’m getting better... ;-)

Besides, the freeper didn’t even explain why he thinks it should be removed from FR. Let’s see... Vince Foster conspiracies (ok); chemtrails (ok); UFO Quix fantasies (ok); Iran-contra conspiracy theories (ok) ; Arkancide conspiracy theories (ok); but... a science topic about an anomaly which has proven to be replicated thousands of times AND has the potential to solve our energy crises -— NO WAY DUDE, there’s all this clamoring to remove it from FR. And there’s no discussion of the science behind the claims.

[Kevmo]

And maybe under several user names on different computers,
***It’s interesting to see how far some detractors get wrapped around the axle. So, I spoofed someone else’s 1998 signup date? And created a fake ping list of a couple dozen freepers interested in the topic? You guys crack me up. You give me that much credit to be able to do genius level hacking, but don’t even bother to address the simple science behind these claims.

just so it looks like there are others here who care about this Pseudoscience production.
***Talk about spamming... if this were Pseudoscience, it wouldn’t have been replicated 14000 times, and the $multiBillion company National Instruments wouldn’t have said there’s an anomalous Heat generation in these experiments.

And no, Kevmo, I haven’t read Baudette’s book.
***Of course not. Skeptopaths never read the stuff they’re so critical of. It’s amazing that you admit to such a thing, you might as well cry out as loud as possible that you’re ignorant and proud of it.

asked & answered
-—————www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@eskimo.com/msg87491.html-—————

LOL! I also haven’t read Whitley Strieber’s book about his personal experiences with alien abduction. Perhaps there’s something to that as well....nah.
***If there was, then $multiBillion companies like Toyota, Mitsubishi, and National Instruments would have been generating data and replications surrounding it. Let me check, have they? Nah.

More people got cheaper insurance through Obamacare, than there are believers in desktop fusion.
***And that’s supposed to be scientifically valid? Science by Bandwagon? How’s that Global Warming libtard crap working for you with that approach?

[Kevmo]

At least now he has to put it in chat or the smokey back room.
***I didn’t ‘have’ to put it in the smokey back room, I chose to put it there because it’s obviously heated discussion. That is, until recently when the moderator removed a thread and said not to put it there, to put it into chat/science. AFAIK, there wasn’t a science tag until very recently.

Now I’ll go back to mostly ignoring you.

[Wonder Warthog]

"AFAIK, there wasn’t a science tag until very recently."

You mean there actually is one now??? Wonderful.

[Kevmo]

You mean there actually is one now??? Wonderful.
***About time, huh?