Posted on 11/23/2013 10:49:15 AM PST by Olog-hai
Canadian environmental scientist David Keith wants to change the worlds climate by creating a type of sun filter in the sky to halt global warming. In an interview, he argues the technology is effective and inexpensive, but critics liken it to a nuclear bomb.
When he first devoted himself to the idea more than 20 years ago, it was considered dangerous nonsense. It enraged climate activists, and even Keith received death threats on his answering machine.
Since then, the concept of geoengineering has increasingly won over supporters, and the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) even grappled with the issue in its most recent report.
(Excerpt) Read more at spiegel.de ...
D.C. Watch: More on EPAs new RFS proposal
Senator: Sports Stadiums 'at Risk from...Sea-Level Rise Effects of Climate Change'
Faith-Based IPCC Turns Science into Sin
Ethanol? More like Yuck-anol! Green Policy Turns Brown, Runs In The Red
Google is Flying High and Polluting the Air with Government-Bought Fuel
Brace Yourself: Feds Take Sensible Step on Energy Policy
Thanksgiving: Pass the gravy but ponder its carbon footprint (a satiric reminder).
Global Warming on Free Republic
It's very cold down here in the South. and it's not even Winter yet. I wonder how cold it is up North
there's been no global warming .
global warming is a hoax and a scam. after 30 years of “global warming” shouldn't we have had some actual warming yet? well it's getting colder not warmer. (google solar cycle 25)
the media , government ,scientists and democrats have all been lying for 30 years.
when will people see the media and scientists have been lying all this time?
That the Sun is producing a useful amount of energy now does not imply that its energy output will always remain within tolerable limits. It is at least theoretically possible that the solar output might change in such a way that large-scale artificial methods could be used to enhance the planet's ability to cope. Of course, unless or until leftism is universally recognized as a cancer on humanity, I would expect any governmental effort to solve the problem on a global scale to do more harm than good, but at least theoretically there could be a need to physically fix it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.